Dave Pawson <> writes:
> On 13 January 2012 20:53, Norman Walsh <> wrote:
>> Chet Ensign <> writes:
>>> Indeed there are approved OASIS naming conventions. They are spelled
>>> out in the Naming Directives at:
>>>
>>> http://docs.oasis-open.org/specGuidelines/ndr/namingDirectives-v1.1.html
>>
>> I thought that applied to the naming of specification documents, not
>> ancillary files such as schemas.
>
> One view is that the output of Oasis Docbook TC is the schema?
Sure, but we also produce a specification that points to a number of
ancillary files: RELAX NG schemas (compact and XML), XML Schemas,
Schematron schemas, etc.
I have no problem naming the standards document according to the OASIS
rules, but I'm less sanguine about applying those rules to every
artifact.
Be seeing you,
norm
--
Norman Walsh <> | Man is an intellectual animal, and
http://www.oasis-open.org/docbook/ | therefore an everlasting
Chair, DocBook Technical Committee | contradiction to himself. His
| senses centre in himself, his
| ideas reach to the ends of the
| universe; so that he is torn to
| pieces between the two, without a
| possibility of its ever being
| otherwise.-- Hazlitt
