← Prev in month ← Prev in thread
Next in thread → Next in month →

DOCBOOK: Re: New name for Element name?

From
Karl EICHWALDER <>
Date
2000-02-05T13:30:03+00:00
ID
Thread
DOCBOOK: Re: New name for Element name?
Steve Greenland <> writes:

|   > I would rather use <p> than <para> when editing... Also, having
|   > <s1> <s2>... intead of
|   > <sect1>... etc.

|   Seriously, this is a long-term maintenance nightmare.

As usual: it depends.

Such a Architectural Form might be very userfriendly and therefor worth
the maintenance.

Please, read more about Architectural Forms and Architectural Processing
in David Megginson's book "Structuring XML Documents" -- the paper is
thick and the title is a litte bit mis-leading: fortunately, it's more
about SGML (from the title page: "Covers XML and full SGML").  But the
contents are great!

[I've no connection with David nor with Prentice Hall; I'm just a happy
reader of this book.]

-- 
work :                           |
     : http://www.suse.de/~ke/             |          ------    ,__o
home :                    |         ------   _-\_<,
     : http://www.franken.de/users/gnu/ke/ |        ------   (*)/'(*)
← Prev in month ← Prev in thread
Next in thread → Next in month →