Dave Pawson <> writes:
> On 04/09/09 17:28, Dick Hamilton wrote:
>> Dave,
>>
>> role is a valid attribute on literal and is a common
>> attribute.
>
>> Since role is user-defined, creating separate names for
>> each element lets customizers define the contents of
>> role independently for different elements.
>>
>> So, it's a common attribute by virtue of being common,
>> but is defined separate from db.common.attributes so
>> that it can be customized.
>
> So it is a tdg omission then?
Well. At the very least, it's not very clear :-)
http://docbook.org/tdg5/en/html/ch05.html#ch05-classrole
Be seeing you,
norm
--
Norman Walsh <> | Men are more like the times they live
http://nwalsh.com/ | in than they are like their
| fathers.--Ali Ibn-abi-talib
