On 05/09/09 12:59, Norman Walsh wrote:
> Dave Pawson<> writes:
>
>>> role is a valid attribute on literal and is a common
>>> attribute.
>> So it is a tdg omission then?
>
> Well. At the very least, it's not very clear :-)
>
> http://docbook.org/tdg5/en/html/ch05.html#ch05-classrole
>
> Be seeing you,
> norm
>
OK. Mmm. My problem I guess. I'd always noted odd
'omissions' in tdg, but assumed the content accurate.
Noting it wasn't showing at
http://docbook.org/tdg5/en/html/literal.html
I presumed it not valid.
Is it one of those 'common' 'common' groupings?
Perhaps visible off
http://docbook.org/tdg5/en/html/ref-elements.html#common.attributes
Request that it be shown, if 'doable' please?
TIA
regards
--
Dave Pawson
XSLT XSL-FO FAQ.
http://www.dpawson.co.uk
