RE: T2 PLEASE READ - Suggested Change - add "From" Service and Actionto the header

William

Using RefToMessageId only solves part of the problem. Specifically it does
not solve the following ...
1. How does the recipient of a message know what to put in the Service and
Action for the message they return in the absence of a CPA (this is from the
Bank Payment example)
2. To use RefToMessageId, the sender of a message, where a reply is
expected, would have no option but to save the data from the EVERY message
even though the message was sent with deliverySemantics of BestEffort. This
should not be necessary. How can it be avoided?
3. If you are using PartyId, Service and Action to route a message, how do
you know which MSH at the Party should receive the message when Service and
Action have fixed values (as in an error message)? With the current spec, a
Party could only have one MSH ... even if it were IBM.

As stated before we need solutions to ALL the problems unless you think the
above are not problems.

Regards

David