RE: [ebxml-msg] Have you implemented Version 2.0 ?

From
Ralph Berwanger <>
Date
2002-03-01T20:56:10+00:00
ID
Thread
RE: [ebxml-msg] Have you implemented Version 2.0 ?
Title: RE: [ebxml-msg] Have you implemented Version 2.0 ?

Lisa,

    Before we start beating on Drummond Group we should be 
careful to understand what they were offering.  They were not certifying that vendor products were 
'compliant' with the specification.  They were offering a service to ensure 
interoperability between products of various vendors.  This may seem like 
hair-splitting (and for those who know me you understand how difficult that is), 
but it is the simple truth.  Vendors were not forced to engage in the 
testing, they voluntarily participated.  There was NO other venue and at 
least this method provided a somewhat impartial third-party validation of 
facts assumed by the vendors.  

 

    I agree that it would be improper to take intellectual 
property 'donated' by various organizations and sell it for gain.  Like you 
and the rest of those on the listserv, we spend significant resources assisting 
with standards work.  It is intended to produce an open consensus-based 
standard, not to advance the interest of any individual company.  I think 
we are sharing the same soap box.  However, in fairness to the Drummond 
Group, that is not what has happened.  They took the specification and 
produced a test plan which allowed the participants in the test to exchange 
messages and to systematically exercise their solutions to ensure that they 
worked with similiar products from other vendors.  In the end, those that 
participated can affirm that their products can interoperate.  They might 
even say that their products are compliant, but not based on the results of the 
test.  That was not the purpose of the test.  For the record, 
I do not totally agree with the statements that David has made below, 
but I cannot fault Drummond Group for their actions.

 

    Regarding compliance testing, a very different process 
is needed.  I exchanged messages with Prakash yesterday on this 
topic.  I am hoping that the OASIS IIC TC can move this forward.  I am 
prepared to assist anyway necessary to help this work progress.  I think we may need to bring 
additional resources to the table to assist the IIC.  Additionally, there other efforts, like the B2B 
Testbed, being proposed by OAG and NIST that can provide additional support to 
this area.  

 

 

Ralph 
Berwanger
Ambassador to 
Standards
bTrade,Inc

---------------------------------------

  
-----Original Message-----
From: David Fischer 
  [mailto:]
Sent: Friday, March 01, 2002 2:05 
  PM
To: Seaburg, Lisa; 
  
Subject: RE: [ebxml-msg] Have you 
  implemented Version 2.0 ?

  
DGI has donated thousands of hours to ebXML over the last two 
  years.  We are represented on five committees (two as editors and one as 
  v1.0 Chair) all non-reimbursed.  The interoperability test ran 
  about four months with daily conference calls and constant work on 
  our part.  We are providing this service for very little more than cost 
  recovery.

  
 

  
DGI is not taking advantage.  Why is this any different than 
  someone implementing the spec and selling their product, thus taking advantage 
  of hundreds of hours of volunteer work?  No one actually volunteers for 
  ebXML.  Everyone has a business reason to be here.

  
 

  
Regards,

  
 

  
David Fischer

  
Drummond Group.

  
    
-----Original Message-----
From: Seaburg, Lisa 
    [mailto:]
Sent: Friday, March 01, 2002 
    1:04 PM
To: 
Subject: RE: 
    [ebxml-msg] Have you implemented Version 2.0 ?

    
Excuse me, but if this is true, the fee is $35,000!  
    Then the Drummond group is blatantly taking advantage of the hundreds of 
    volunteer hours put in by all the people involved.  I would like to get 
    on my soapbox about this, but I won't today.  I will wait and see what 
    other comments come from this email thread.

    
Lisa 

    
-----Original Message----- 
From: 
    Duane Nickull [mailto:] 
    
Sent: Friday, March 01, 2002 7:58 AM 
To: Patrick Yee 
Cc: Cliff Collins; 
     
Subject: Re: 
    [ebxml-msg] Have you implemented Version 2.0 ? 

    
The stated charge is a bit steep at $35,000 a pop. 
    

    
Duane 

    
Patrick Yee wrote: 
> 
    
> Excuse me, I want to ask a side track 
    question. 
> What is the charge to have the 
    messaging implementation to be tested by the 
> 
    Drummond Group? Thanks. 
> 
> Regards, 
> -Patrick 
> -- 
> Patrick Yee 
> System Architect 
> Center for 
    E-Commerce Infrastructure Development (CECID) 
> 
    Dept. of Computer Science and Information Systems 
> The University of Hong Kong 
> Tel: 
    (852) 22415674 
> Fax: (852) 25474611 
    
> 
> ----- Original Message 
    ----- 
> From: "Cliff Collins" 
    <> 
> To: 
    <>; <> 
    
> Sent: Friday, March 01, 2002 2:06 AM 
> Subject: RE: [ebxml-msg] Have you implemented Version 2.0 
    ? 
> 
> > Sybase has 
    implemented Version 2.0 of the specification.  Our 
> > product is also part of the interoperability test 
    that 
> > is being run by the Drummond 
    Group. 
> > 
> > 
    Cliff 
> > 
> > 
    > -----Original Message----- 
> > > From: 
     [mailto:] 
    
> > > Sent: Thursday, February 28, 2002 9:47 
    AM 
> > > To: 
     
> > > 
    Subject: [ebxml-msg] Have you implemented Version 2.0 ? 
> > > 
> > > 
    
> > > Implementers 
> 
    > > 
> > > As I only have a couple of 
    outstanding non returned ballots the 
> > > 
    specification looks likely to pass I need confirmation that the 
    
> > > specification has been implemented and does 
    work as we have specified 
> for 
> > > the submission process.  I would like this to be 
    open so please post an 
> > > e-mail to the 
    list confirming you have successfully implemented 
> > > Version 2.0 
> > > of 
    the message services.  This is NOT a product announcement only 
    that 
> you 
> > > 
    have implemented and tested it internally.  If you do not want 
    this 
> public 
> > 
    > please e-mail me direct and only the number of implantation will be 
    made 
> > > public. 
> > > 
> > > Ian 
    Jones 
> > > Chair OASIS ebXML Messaging 
    Services TC 
> > > 
> > > Tel:  +44 (0)29 2072 4063 
> > > Fax: +44 (0)29 2072 4137 
> 
    > > Email:  
> > 
    > 
> > > 
> 
    > > 
    ---------------------------------------------------------------- 
    
> > > To subscribe or unsubscribe from this elist 
    use the subscription 
> > > manager: <http://lists.oasis-open.org/ob/adm.pl> 
> > > 
> > 
> > 
> > 
    ---------------------------------------------------------------- 
    
> > To subscribe or unsubscribe from this elist use 
    the subscription 
> > manager: <http://lists.oasis-open.org/ob/adm.pl> 
> 
> 
    ---------------------------------------------------------------- 
    
> To subscribe or unsubscribe from this elist use the 
    subscription 
> manager: <http://lists.oasis-open.org/ob/adm.pl> 

    
-- 
CTO, XML Global 
    Technologies 
**************************** 
    
Transformation - http://www.xmlglobal.com/prod/foundation/ 
ebXML Central - http://www.xmlglobal.com/prod/central/ 

    
---------------------------------------------------------------- 
    
To subscribe or unsubscribe from this elist use the 
    subscription 
manager: <http://lists.oasis-open.org/ob/adm.pl>