| 00000 |
A use case for the p1622 group: p1622-audit-01: Post-election tabulation auditing |
Neal McBurnett
|
2011-01-11 17:56 |
| 00001 |
Re: [election-services] A use case for the p1622 group:p1622-audit-01: Post-election tabulation auditing |
David Webber
|
2011-01-11 18:12 |
| 00002 |
RE: [election-services] A use case for the p1622 group: p1622-audit-01: Post-election tabulation auditing |
John Borras
|
2011-01-12 08:54 |
| 00003 |
Re: [election-services] A use case for the p1622 group:p1622-audit-01: Post-election tabulation auditing |
David Webber
|
2011-01-12 17:08 |
| 00004 |
RE: [election-services] A use case for the p1622 group: p1622-audit-01: Post-election tabulation auditing |
John Borras
|
2011-01-12 17:23 |
| 00005 |
CiviCRM project on Sourceforge |
David Webber
|
2011-01-17 21:05 |
| 00006 |
Clarifications for EML-310 Voter registration |
David Webber
|
2011-01-21 17:43 |
| 00007 |
Clarifications on EML 410 Ballot |
David Webber
|
2011-01-21 17:57 |
| 00008 |
Clarification on EML 210 candidate |
David Webber
|
2011-01-21 17:59 |
| 00009 |
RE: [election-services] Clarifications on EML 410 Ballot |
John Borras
|
2011-01-24 08:57 |
| 00010 |
RE: [election-services] Clarification on EML 210 candidate |
John Borras
|
2011-01-24 08:59 |
| 00011 |
Re: [election-services] Clarification on EML 210 candidate |
David Webber
|
2011-01-25 16:52 |
