RE: [emergency-msg] Re: My comment on the geo-oasis namespace URI

From
Alessandro Triglia <>
Date
2007-08-21T21:10:30+00:00
ID
006901c7e437$9555f080$8901a8c0@aldebaran
Thread
RE: [emergency-msg] Re: My comment on the geo-oasis namespace URI
> -----Original Message-----
> From: Ham, Gary A [mailto:] 
> Sent: Tuesday, August 21, 2007 16:50
> To: 
> Subject: RE: [emergency-msg] Re: My comment on the geo-oasis 
> namespace URI
> 
> Sorry that I could not make the meeting today.  Hassles all 
> around. Still, I 100% concur with Alessandro's comment. All 
> references should be in URI format. 


Do you mean "URN"?

I really don't have a strong preference for URN vs. URL (in principle), but
I think it would be good to adopt a consistent convention within the TC.  

My point is that the URI (whether it's a URN or a URL) should comply with
the OASIS rules.  Those rules allow the use of either URLs or URNs, but the
URL in question does not comply with those rules.

Alessandro


>  
> Respectfully,
>  
> Gary Ham
>  
> www.grandpaham.com
>