Yes, I meant URN. And we must comply with the OASIS rules.
Cheers,
Rex
At 5:09 PM -0400 8/21/07, Alessandro Triglia wrote:
>
>
>> -----Original Message-----
>> From: Ham, Gary A [mailto:]
>> Sent: Tuesday, August 21, 2007 16:50
>> To:
>> Subject: RE: [emergency-msg] Re: My comment on the geo-oasis
>> namespace URI
>>
>> Sorry that I could not make the meeting today. Hassles all
>> around. Still, I 100% concur with Alessandro's comment. All
>> references should be in URI format.
>
>
>Do you mean "URN"?
>
>I really don't have a strong preference for URN vs. URL (in principle), but
>I think it would be good to adopt a consistent convention within the TC.
>
>My point is that the URI (whether it's a URN or a URL) should comply with
>the OASIS rules. Those rules allow the use of either URLs or URNs, but the
>URL in question does not comply with those rules.
>
>Alessandro
>
>
>>
>> Respectfully,
>>
>> Gary Ham
>>
>> www.grandpaham.com
>>
--
Rex Brooks
President, CEO
Starbourne Communications Design
GeoAddress: 1361-A Addison
Berkeley, CA 94702
Tel: 510-898-0670
