RE: [legalxml-courtfiling] [Fwd: ECF 1.1 spec testing status repo rtfrom King County, Washington]

From
System
Date
2002-09-30T12:36:00+00:00
ID
Thread
RE: [legalxml-courtfiling] [Fwd: ECF 1.1 spec testing status repo rtfrom King County, Washington]
MHonArc v2.5.2 -->

legalxml-courtfiling message

[Date Prev]
 | [Thread Prev]
 | [Thread Next]
 | [Date Next]

--

[Date Index]
 | [Thread Index]
 | [Elist Home]

Subject: RE: [legalxml-courtfiling] [Fwd: ECF 1.1 spec testing status repo	rtfrom King County, Washington]

From: 

To: , 

Date: Mon, 30 Sep 2002 09:34:52 -0700

The problem with ambiguous elements that Catherine discusses in several
places in her report reminds me of the comment by Dr. Leff in his ebXML
liaison report about the rest of the world using a "construction" approach
to element definition instead of our "restriction" approach.  Revising our
standards accordingly to use the construction approach should resolve some
of the existing implementation ambiguities and make the standards more
interoperable.