RE: [legalxml-courtfiling] CourtFiling Action Item - New Orleans

MHonArc v2.5.0b2 -->
















legalxml-courtfiling message






[Date Prev]
 | [Thread Prev]
 | [Thread Next]
 | [Date Next]

--

[Date Index]
 | [Thread Index]
 | [List Home]








Subject: RE: [legalxml-courtfiling] CourtFiling Action Item - New Orleans




From: "Cabral, James E." <>
To: "John Ruegg" <>,<>
Date: Tue, 8 Jun 2004 11:44:29 -0700






Title: CourtFiling Action Item - New Orleans



John Ruegg's Court Filing FAQ looks to me like a great 
start at defining the ebXML messaging profile for Court Filing Blue.  Thank 
you especially for providing the references to the relevant sections of the 
other specifications.  By leveraging these other specifications for common 
components like messaging and security, we can hopefully focus the work of the 
committee on the aspects specific to court filing.  
 
What's the next step here?  We will need a process to 
review and approve messaging and security profiles but we probably wait until 
we've defined the core specification in more detail.
Jim Cabral 
 



From: John Ruegg 
[mailto:]
Sent: Friday, May 21, 2004 4:21 
PM
To: 
Subject: 
[legalxml-courtfiling] CourtFiling Action Item - New 
Orleans



Please find attached a document which maps Court 
Filing Blue discussion items to existing Open Standards.  This draft is for 
TC review and comment as input to Court Filing Blue standards for LegalXML 
Message Packaging, Message/Payload Authentication, Confidentiality and 
non-repudiation.
<<CFBlueRequirementsFAQ.doc>> 












[Date Prev]
 | [Thread Prev]
 | [Thread Next]
 | [Date Next]

--

[Date Index]
 | [Thread Index]
 | [List Home]