"Dave Pawson" <> wrote on 06/30/2008 11:13:33 AM:
> 2008/6/30 Dennis E. Hamilton <>:
> > +1 [;<). - Dennis
> >
> > -----Original Message-----
> >
http://lists.oasis-open.org/archives/office-comment/200806/msg00065.html
> > From: [mailto:]
> > Sent: Sunday, June 29, 2008 12:40
> > To: ;
> > Subject: [office-comment] Proposed resolution to public comment #10
> >
> >
> > I proposed that this be replaced by:
> >
> > "Table 1 lists the namespace prefixes this specification uses when
> > referring to elements and attributes in the various ODF namespaces.
> > Conforming ODF documents may substitute other namespace prefixes,
bound to
> > the listed namespace URN's, in accordance with the Namespaces in XML
> > specification [xml-names]."
>
>
>
>
> Perhaps add a requirement for namespace well-formed as per
> http://www.w3.org/TR/xml-names/#Conformance
>
I'm thinking that the phrase "in accordance with the Namespaces in XML
specification..." would cover that. Would stating it as "in conformance
with..." be clearer?
-Rob
