I think it would be useful to specify somewhere (I am not digging out a spec
and looking, so forgive me) that the XML for ODF conforms to [xml-names]
(assuming that the specification doesn't contradict that) as a normative
condition.
I don't think that modifying the particular clause will accomplish what Dave
is noticing (although one could still make that change), because the
statement is about the Table 1 namespace prefixes and not about where ":"
can occur.
- Dennis
-----Original Message-----
http://lists.oasis-open.org/archives/office-comment/200806/msg00069.html
From:
Sent: Monday, June 30, 2008 10:03
To:
Subject: Re: [office-comment] Proposed resolution to public comment #10
"Dave Pawson" <> wrote on 06/30/2008 11:13:33 AM:
[ ... ]
> > "Table 1 lists the namespace prefixes this specification uses when
> > referring to elements and attributes in the various ODF namespaces.
> > Conforming ODF documents may substitute other namespace prefixes,
bound to
> > the listed namespace URN's, in accordance with the Namespaces in XML
> > specification [xml-names]."
>
> Perhaps add a requirement for namespace well-formed as per
> http://www.w3.org/TR/xml-names/#Conformance
>
I'm thinking that the phrase "in accordance with the Namespaces in XML
specification..." would cover that. Would stating it as "in conformance
with..." be clearer?
-Rob
