Dennis Hamilton scripsit:
> I don't understand the statement that the result is undefined when x and p
> have opposite signs.
It is not undefined in the sense of mathematics, where every pair of
arguments is defined except those where p = 0. It is undefined in
the sense of the OF standard, since different conforming implementations
do different things with it. (It *is* defined in the sense of
the Common Lisp standard.)
> PS: It does not matter whether I believe the statement in the OpenFormula
> text is in error or not. I am not on the ODF TC and not the one to make
> any repairs to the specification (although sometimes my advice is useful
> to the TC).
Fair enough. But you claimed that the text was not in fact in error.
--
John Cowan http://www.ccil.org/~cowan
Be yourself. Especially do not feign a working knowledge of RDF where
no such knowledge exists. Neither be cynical about RELAX NG; for in
the face of all aridity and disenchantment in the world of markup,
James Clark is as perennial as the grass. --DeXiderata, Sean McGrath
