On Dec 11, 2006, at 12:04 PM, David Faure wrote:
> However the notion of a list-id for a bit more structure sounds
> nice, and from what I recall,
> MSWord lists also have the equivalent of a list-id, this is where
> this idea mostly comes from.
My question about the generic identity issue goes back to the xml:id
discussion. Do we want to converge the myriad of different equivalent
attributes (but which XML tools of course do not understand as such)
towards xml:id? If yes, should we be introducing still new id
attributes?
Just asking ...
Bruce
