On Monday 11 December 2006 18:10, Bruce D'Arcus wrote:
>
> On Dec 11, 2006, at 12:04 PM, David Faure wrote:
>
> > However the notion of a list-id for a bit more structure sounds
> > nice, and from what I recall,
> > MSWord lists also have the equivalent of a list-id, this is where
> > this idea mostly comes from.
>
> My question about the generic identity issue goes back to the xml:id
> discussion. Do we want to converge the myriad of different equivalent
> attributes (but which XML tools of course do not understand as such)
> towards xml:id? If yes, should we be introducing still new id
> attributes?
Well that's very different ;) xml-id is supposed to be unique, right?
list-id, on the other hand, is about referring to a list from multiple numbered paragraphs,
so it's definitely NOT unique (the same value would be found multiple times in a given
xml document).
--
David Faure, , sponsored by Trolltech to work on KDE,
Konqueror (http://www.konqueror.org), and KOffice (http://www.koffice.org).
