Dear TC members,
sorry, but I directly have to clarify the following statement:
Florian Reuter wrote:
> Hi all,
>
...
>
> Wrt. Continuation of lists:
> <quote>
> Thus, the same XML fragment will be interpreted differently in ODF 1.1 and ODF 1.2 with Proposal Two.
> </quote>
> Oliver is not very precise here. A better statement would be
> <revised>
> Thus, the same XML fragment will be interpreted differently in ODF 1.1 and ODF 1.2 with Proposal Two when Olivers' understand of ODF1.1 lists is used.
> </revised>
> However exactly this case is not specified by ODF1.1. Its also worth mentioning that Olivers' understanding of ODF1.1 lists contradicts e.g. with OOo's understanding of ODF1.1 lists.
>
It's not my understanding, it's what the ODF specification specifies.
OpenOffice.org implements this part of the ODF specification not
correct. This defect has to be corrected. It's not a valid understanding
of the this part of the ODF specification.
...
Regards, Oliver.
