Hi Thomas,
Thomas Zander wrote:
> On Monday 16 April 2007 09:44, Florian Reuter wrote:
>> Oliver is not very precise here. A better statement would be
>> <revised>
>> Thus, the same XML fragment will be interpreted differently in ODF 1.1
>> and ODF 1.2 with Proposal Two when Olivers' understand of ODF1.1 lists
>> is used. </revised>
>> However exactly this case is not specified by ODF1.1. Its also worth
>> mentioning that Olivers' understanding of ODF1.1 lists contradicts e.g.
>> with OOo's understanding of ODF1.1 lists.
>
> For a fact I know that what your proposal states means the way that
> KOffice does lists is completely wrong. In other words; your proposal
> would make documents created in koffice fail to comply.
>
> And may I say that I if someone employed by Sun and working on lists
> states that the current way of using lists is X and you are stating that
> to not be true. Then without looking at the tiny details; I'm certainly
> inclined to believe the technician that works on the code.
>
> Anyway; I read the both proposals and the comparison;
> my comparison would be really really simple:
>
> Propsal by Florian changes behavior incompatible with existing
> behavior, proposal by me/Oliver writes down the existing behavior and
> expands on that.
>
> Is there anything more that is relevant?
Please stick to the road map posted by our TC chair - see
http://www.oasis-open.org/archives/office/200703/msg00362.html, which
has been accepted by the TC - see
http://www.oasis-open.org/archives/office/200704/msg00005.html
Regards, Oliver.
