On Wednesday 13 June 2007 13:07:27 Eike Rathke wrote:
> > Making the value an attribute will, IMHO, make it consistent with the
> > current filter-condition semantics, although in practice it would not
> > matter too much one way or the other.
> >
> > What do others think of this?
>
> I'm completely unbiased. Thinking that a bit further though: do we need
> a <filter-set-item> element at all? Wouldn't a table:set-item attribute
> do as well? As in
>
> <filter-condition table:field-number=1 table:operator="="
> table:value="John Doe" table:set-item="John Doe"
> table:set-item="Jane Doe"/>
>
> I may be completely wrong on this of course.
AFAIK this is not possible, you can't have more than one attribute of the
same name.
--
Thomas Zander
