On Tuesday 12 June 2007 16:56:40 Kohei Yoshida wrote:
> The original motivation for proposing this format:
>
> <filter-set-item table:value="John Doe"/>
>
> instead of the other format:
>
> <filter-set-item>John Doe</filter-set-item>
>
> is to make it in line with the 'table:value' attribute of the current
> table:filter-condition element, which is formatted like this:
>
> <filter-condition table:field-number=1 table:operator="="
> table:value="Doe"/>
I understand the logic, but I am under the impression that the moving of
the attribute to become a node will make the suggestion of mine to be
very common and obvious.
In other words; if its all the same to you, I think we should go for the
<filter-set-item>John Doe</filter-set-item>
form.
ps. I'm totally uninformed about the actual feature you are extending. So
it would be great to get someone else to comment on that.
--
Thomas Zander
