Re: [office] Exchanging RelaxNG XML of the ODF spec to the compactsyntax

From
Bruce D'Arcus <>
Date
2007-08-15T16:55:26+00:00
ID
Thread
Re: [office] Exchanging RelaxNG XML of the ODF spec to the compactsyntax
Dave Pawson wrote:
> On 15/08/07,  <> wrote:
>> Question is do we beleive that the Trang conversion is perfect and will not
>> introduce any errors?
> The author of Trang believes this is not true.

An awkward sentence construction: what's the referent "this"?

 From the rest of your message, it sound like it is "that conversion is 
not perfect" (e.g. a double-negative), which would mean we can be safe 
assuming it is "perfect"?

Bruce