Bruce,
Actually I asked Svante about this and he suggested:
Relax -> compact Relax, followed by:
compact Relax -> Relax^1, followed by:
diff on Relax and Relax^1.
I would add some spot checking on some of the more complex
constructions, say about 5% of the total. Just as a sanity check.
Hope you are having a great day!
Patrick
Bruce D'Arcus wrote:
> Dave Pawson wrote:
>> On 15/08/07, <> wrote:
>>> Question is do we beleive that the Trang conversion is perfect and
>>> will not
>>> introduce any errors?
>> The author of Trang believes this is not true.
>
> An awkward sentence construction: what's the referent "this"?
>
> From the rest of your message, it sound like it is "that conversion is
> not perfect" (e.g. a double-negative), which would mean we can be safe
> assuming it is "perfect"?
>
> Bruce
>
>
--
Patrick Durusau
Chair, V1 - US TAG to JTC 1/SC 34
Acting Convener, JTC 1/SC 34/WG 3 (Topic Maps)
Co-Editor, ISO/IEC 13250-1, 13250-5 (Topic Maps)
Co-Editor, OpenDocument Format (OASIS, ISO/IEC 26300)
