Greetings!
I started to respond to some of the post on the comments on the *draft*
response to N1078 but decided that I shouldn't single any particular
comment out for this response.
I am not real sure what was unclear that this was a *draft* response
that treated the substance of the comments.
Instead, apparently there is a lot of concern over format (same or
different), cover sheets, etc. All matters that are easy enough to
correct *once we agree on substantive answers.* That was why I filed
such a rough copy with the JIRA links so that the *substance* of the
suggested responses could be evaluated.
But that would require reading the draft response earlier than the
morning of the meeting where it would be discussed. And having comments
that address the *substance* of those proposed responses. I don't doubt
some of them may be *wrong.* It wasn't my intent for any of them to be
wrong but I don't doubt that some of them may be. That is where I really
need help from the TC in reviewing the substance of the responses.
I should have time in the morning to review some of the format "issues"
in the morning but suspect it will be tomorrow evening before I can file
another version of the document.
Hope everyone is having a great day!
Patrick
--
Patrick Durusau
Chair, V1 - US TAG to JTC 1/SC 34
Convener, JTC 1/SC 34/WG 3 (Topic Maps)
Editor, OpenDocument Format TC (OASIS), Project Editor ISO/IEC 26300
Co-Editor, ISO/IEC 13250-1, 13250-5 (Topic Maps)
