Hi Dave,
On 09/02/09 10:45, Dave Pawson wrote:
> 2009/9/2 Michael Brauer - Sun Germany - ham02 - Hamburg
> <>:
>
>> Yes, this is a valid point. In addition, there may be situations where
>> any of the algorithms defined by the W3C or any set of algorithms we may
>> define ourselves does not include an algorithm that is mandated by a
>> particular organization or government that wishes to use ODF. So, also
>> from that perspective, it seems to be reasonable to me that, if we allow
>> additional algorithms, that we are not again restricting them to a
>> particular set.
>
> I.e. not defining a standard.
If you look at
http://www.w3.org/TR/xmlenc-core/#sec-Algorithms
would you say that http://www.w3.org/TR/xmlenc-core is also not defining
a standard, or where is the difference between that and what I have
proposed for ODF?
Michael
>
>
>> Regarding implementation defined IRIs, we have already a requirement
>> that conforming implementations have to document the implementation
>> defined values they are using. This includes the IRIs that denote
>> algorithms.
>
> Which may be just as hard as not using a standard, e.g.
> if there are security aspects to disclosing the algorithm?
>
>
>
>>> 3) Do we allow implementation-defined algorithms beyond those which we
>>> have assigned identifiers to?
>> I would recommend that for the reasons mentioned above.
>
> Another nail in the ODF coffin Michael?
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
--
Michael Brauer, Technical Architect Software Engineering
StarOffice/OpenOffice.org
Sun Microsystems GmbH Nagelsweg 55
D-20097 Hamburg, Germany
http://sun.com/staroffice +49 40 23646 500
http://blogs.sun.com/GullFOSS
Sitz der Gesellschaft: Sun Microsystems GmbH, Sonnenallee 1,
D-85551 Kirchheim-Heimstetten
Amtsgericht Muenchen: HRB 161028
Geschaeftsfuehrer: Thomas Schroeder, Wolfgang Engels, Wolf Frenkel
Vorsitzender des Aufsichtsrates: Martin Haering
