Re: [office] Re: encryption

From
Michael Brauer - Sun Germany - ham02 - Hamburg <>
Date
2009-09-02T09:33:30+00:00
ID
Thread
Re: [office] Re: encryption
Hi Bob,

On 08/31/09 16:45, Bob Jolliffe wrote:
> In addition - I don't know the answer to this, but in the interest of 
> uniformity, is there also an IRI which can used to indicate blowfish?  
> Then we are clear the value of the attribute is an IRI.

I don't think there is an IRI defined for blowfish, but it seems to be a 
good idea to define one. To provide backward compatibility we anyway 
would have to support the old non-IRI values, but we may deprecate them 
later if we define an IRI now.

Thank you for your feedback.

Michael
> 
> 2009/8/31 Bob Jolliffe < 
> <mailto:>>
> 
>     what I was trying to say on the call is that we now have 3 options
>     for each algorithm, including a catchall "implementation defined"
>     IRI.  I would prefer to see this last option allowed but not
>     recommended.
> 
>     Regards
>     Bob
> 
> 


-- 
Michael Brauer, Technical Architect Software Engineering
StarOffice/OpenOffice.org
Sun Microsystems GmbH             Nagelsweg 55
D-20097 Hamburg, Germany          
http://sun.com/staroffice         +49 40 23646 500
http://blogs.sun.com/GullFOSS

Sitz der Gesellschaft: Sun Microsystems GmbH, Sonnenallee 1,
	   D-85551 Kirchheim-Heimstetten
Amtsgericht Muenchen: HRB 161028
Geschaeftsfuehrer: Thomas Schroeder, Wolfgang Engels, Wolf Frenkel
Vorsitzender des Aufsichtsrates: Martin Haering