[OASIS Issue Tracker] Created: (OFFICE-2638) 19.511style:rel-height - scale-min definition is unclear

19.511 style:rel-height - scale-min definition is unclear
---------------------------------------------------------

                 Key: OFFICE-2638
                 URL: http://tools.oasis-open.org/issues/browse/OFFICE-2638
             Project: OASIS Open Document Format for Office Applications (OpenDocument) TC
          Issue Type: Bug
    Affects Versions: ODF 1.2 Part 1 CD 5
            Reporter: Patrick Durusau
            Assignee: Patrick Durusau
            Priority: Minor
             Fix For: ODF 1.2 Part 1 CD 5


The value scale-min now reads:

"scale-min: equals the value scale, except that the calculated width or height is a minimum height rather than an absolute one."

The value scale reads:

"scale: the height should be calculated depending on the width, so that the ratio of width and height of the original image or object size is preserved."

I was replacing the "equals" in scale-min when I noticed that "...is a minimum height rather than an absolute one." isn't meaningful.

Nor does it make much sense to say that "...the calculated width or height is a minimum height.." Both width and height are a minimum height? 

Is the purpose to say that the original ratio of the original object size is not preserved? (implementation dependent?)

-- 
This message is automatically generated by JIRA.
-
If you think it was sent incorrectly contact one of the administrators: http://tools.oasis-open.org/issues/secure/Administrators.jspa
-
For more information on JIRA, see: http://www.atlassian.com/software/jira