[OASIS Issue Tracker] Commented: (OFFICE-2638) 19.511style:rel-height - scale-min definition is unclear

[ http://tools.oasis-open.org/issues/browse/OFFICE-2638?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=18695#action_18695 ] 

Patrick Durusau commented on OFFICE-2638:
-----------------------------------------

This also comes up in style:rel-width for <draw:frame> (19.512.2) 

And again for style:rel-height at 20.329

And 20.330.1


> 19.511 style:rel-height - scale-min definition is unclear
> ---------------------------------------------------------
>
>                 Key: OFFICE-2638
>                 URL: http://tools.oasis-open.org/issues/browse/OFFICE-2638
>             Project: OASIS Open Document Format for Office Applications (OpenDocument) TC
>          Issue Type: Bug
>    Affects Versions: ODF 1.2 Part 1 CD 5
>            Reporter: Patrick Durusau
>            Assignee: Patrick Durusau
>            Priority: Minor
>             Fix For: ODF 1.2 Part 1 CD 5
>
>
> The value scale-min now reads:
> "scale-min: equals the value scale, except that the calculated width or height is a minimum height rather than an absolute one."
> The value scale reads:
> "scale: the height should be calculated depending on the width, so that the ratio of width and height of the original image or object size is preserved."
> I was replacing the "equals" in scale-min when I noticed that "...is a minimum height rather than an absolute one." isn't meaningful.
> Nor does it make much sense to say that "...the calculated width or height is a minimum height.." Both width and height are a minimum height? 
> Is the purpose to say that the original ratio of the original object size is not preserved? (implementation dependent?)

-- 
This message is automatically generated by JIRA.
-
If you think it was sent incorrectly contact one of the administrators: http://tools.oasis-open.org/issues/secure/Administrators.jspa
-
For more information on JIRA, see: http://www.atlassian.com/software/jira