| 1 |
Re: [oiic-formation-discuss] My perspective. display perferct? |
88 |
Jun 2008 |
| 2 |
Deliverable: odf-diff? |
44 |
Jun 2008 |
| 3 |
The importance to users of documents looking the same |
42 |
Jun 2008 |
| 4 |
Proposed Use case -- Interoperability in vertical and horizontal ODF markets |
40 |
Jun 2008 |
| 5 |
Which is definitive odf? |
38 |
Jun 2008 |
| 6 |
(1)(f) and (1)(g) -- audience and working language |
29 |
Jun 2008 |
| 7 |
Interoperability versus Conformity |
25 |
Jun 2008 |
| 8 |
MARBUX POINT OF ORDER, OBJECTION, AND SUGGESTIONS No. 1 |
25 |
Jun 2008 |
| 9 |
Summary and Focus? |
25 |
Jun 2008 |
| 10 |
Re: [oiic-formation-discuss] My perspective. Extensions |
25 |
Jun 2008 |
| 11 |
PROPOSAL -- Name change for proposed TC |
23 |
Jun 2008 |
| 12 |
Can we turn on list moderation now? |
23 |
Jun 2008 |
| 13 |
Reason and example arguing for the use of an ODF (or XML) canonical form |
23 |
Jul 2008 |
| 14 |
Re: [oiic-formation-discuss] Acid Tests |
22 |
Jun 2008 |
| 15 |
Level of detail needed in a TC Charter |
22 |
Jun 2008 |
| 16 |
Caution and Disclaimer on Interoperability |
21 |
Jun 2008 |
| 17 |
Profiles: suggested use-cases |
17 |
Jun 2008 |
| 18 |
Draft proposal, or brain dump |
16 |
Jun 2008 |
| 19 |
Informative clauses |
16 |
Jun 2008 |
| 20 |
Code walkthrough |
16 |
Jul 2008 |
| 21 |
Welcome! |
15 |
Jun 2008 |
| 22 |
(1)(d) A list of deliverables, with projected completion dates. |
15 |
Jun 2008 |
| 23 |
Re: [oiic-formation-discuss] MARBUX POINT OF ORDER, OBJECTION, ANDSUGGESTIONS No. 1 |
15 |
Jun 2008 |
| 24 |
TC formation proposal. |
15 |
Jul 2008 |
| 25 |
Re: [oiic-formation-discuss] Group effort - how we talk. |
13 |
Jun 2008 |
| 26 |
Re: [oiic-formation-discuss] Proposed Use case -- Interoperability invertical and horizontal ODF markets |
13 |
Jun 2008 |
| 27 |
Draft Interoperability and Conformance TC formation proposal (0.2) |
13 |
Jul 2008 |
| 28 |
My perspective |
12 |
Jun 2008 |
| 29 |
"Strictly conforming" is not related to "interoperable" |
11 |
Jun 2008 |
| 30 |
Profiles |
11 |
Jun 2008 |
| 31 |
Profiles. Attempting a definition. |
11 |
Jun 2008 |
| 32 |
Feedback to the ODF TC |
11 |
Jun 2008 |
| 33 |
Re: [oiic-formation-discuss] Acid Tests (was: Re: [oiic-formation-discuss] Interoperability versus Conformity) |
10 |
Jun 2008 |
| 34 |
IRC Channel created and registered |
10 |
Jun 2008 |
| 35 |
Thread cutting... |
9 |
Jun 2008 |
| 36 |
Value and danger of extensions |
9 |
Jul 2008 |
| 37 |
What are we validating and why? |
8 |
Jun 2008 |
| 38 |
Experts needed |
8 |
Jun 2008 |
| 39 |
Re: [oiic-formation-discuss] (1)(d) A list of deliverables, with projectedcompletion dates. |
8 |
Jun 2008 |
| 40 |
Moving forward |
8 |
Jun 2008 |
| 41 |
Re: [oiic-formation-discuss] (1)(f) and (1)(g) -- audience and workinglanguage |
7 |
Jun 2008 |
| 42 |
Thoughts on interop |
7 |
Jun 2008 |
| 43 |
Re: [oiic-formation-discuss] The importance to users of documents lookingthe same |
7 |
Jun 2008 |
| 44 |
Support the user with diverse ODF provisions |
7 |
Jul 2008 |
| 45 |
Re: [oiic-formation-discuss] Draft Interoperability and Conformance TCformation proposal (0.2) |
7 |
Jul 2008 |
| 46 |
What is interoperability anyway / really? |
6 |
Jun 2008 |
| 47 |
Group effort |
6 |
Jun 2008 |
| 48 |
Reference implementation. Layout perfect. |
6 |
Jun 2008 |
| 49 |
Classic test case |
6 |
Jun 2008 |
| 50 |
Re: [oiic-formation-discuss] PROPOSAL -- Name change for proposedTC |
6 |
Jun 2008 |
| 51 |
Canonicalizations galore |
6 |
Jun 2008 |
| 52 |
List of ODF interop issues that need to be addressed -- Electronic signatures |
6 |
Jun 2008 |
| 53 |
ODF IIC Technical Committee Wiki (Google Apps at odfiic.org) |
5 |
Jun 2008 |
| 54 |
Re-focusing on the proposed Charter |
5 |
Jun 2008 |
| 55 |
(1)(e) Specification of the IPR Mode under which the TC will operate. |
5 |
Jun 2008 |
| 56 |
ODF Interoperability Presentation |
5 |
Jun 2008 |
| 57 |
Microsoft, Intel now ODF TC members? |
5 |
Jun 2008 |
| 58 |
Re: [oiic-formation-discuss] (1)(d) A list of deliverables,with projected completion dates. |
5 |
Jun 2008 |
| 59 |
[Re: [oiic-formation-discuss] Reference implementation. Layout perfect.] |
5 |
Jun 2008 |
| 60 |
Marbux: Request for more detail |
5 |
Jun 2008 |
| 61 |
Joining the new TC -- Who is in, who is out? |
5 |
Jun 2008 |
| 62 |
Re: [oiic-formation-discuss] The importance to users of documentslooking the same |
5 |
Jun 2008 |
| 63 |
Use Cases |
5 |
Jun 2008 |
| 64 |
Sun validation suite |
5 |
Jul 2008 |
| 65 |
Re: [oiic-formation-discuss] Draft Interoperability and ConformanceTC formation proposal (0.2) |
5 |
Jul 2008 |
| 66 |
ACID, roundtrip and Odf generation |
4 |
Jun 2008 |
| 67 |
Re: [oiic-formation-discuss] Implementation vs. result (CDRF, profiles, et al.) |
4 |
Jun 2008 |
| 68 |
OASIS Guidelines to Writing Conformance Clauses |
4 |
Jun 2008 |
| 69 |
Test count |
4 |
Jul 2008 |
| 70 |
A few basic test documents |
4 |
Jul 2008 |
| 71 |
Re: [oiic-formation-discuss] Reason and example arguing for the useof an ODF (or XML) canonical form |
4 |
Jul 2008 |
| 72 |
Draft Interoperability and Conformance TC formation proposal (0.3) |
4 |
Jul 2008 |
| 73 |
Re: draft proposal 0.3 - Establishing the conformance landscape |
4 |
Jul 2008 |
| 74 |
Hello from Covington! |
3 |
Jun 2008 |
| 75 |
Re: [oiic-formation-discuss] (1)(e) Specification of the IPR Modeunder which the TC will operate. |
3 |
Jun 2008 |
| 76 |
Question on references |
3 |
Jun 2008 |
| 77 |
ODF Acid Test - Proof of Concept |
3 |
Jun 2008 |
| 78 |
Reference implementation strikes gold |
3 |
Jun 2008 |
| 79 |
Spreadsheets and the OpenFormula group |
3 |
Jun 2008 |
| 80 |
Test priority |
3 |
Jun 2008 |
| 81 |
Standards and Antitrust |
3 |
Jun 2008 |
| 82 |
Features, abstract features, and precise element semantics to limit lock-in |
3 |
Jun 2008 |
| 83 |
Implementation, Interoperability and Conformance |
3 |
Jun 2008 |
| 84 |
xml.com article |
2 |
Jun 2008 |
| 85 |
Proposal for Charter Requirements section, was Which is definitive odf? |
2 |
Jun 2008 |
| 86 |
Question (2)(f) Member Section |
2 |
Jun 2008 |
| 87 |
Re: [oiic-formation-discuss] Implementation vs. result (CDRF, profiles,et al.) |
2 |
Jun 2008 |
| 88 |
Re: [oiic-formation-discuss] The importance to users of documentslooking the same |
2 |
Jun 2008 |
| 89 |
Re: [oiic-formation-discuss] The importance to users of documentslooking the same |
2 |
Jun 2008 |
| 90 |
Re: [oiic-formation-discuss] #oiic IRC Channel now being logged andarchived |
2 |
Jun 2008 |
| 91 |
OASIS Test Assertions Guidelines (TAG) TC |
2 |
Jun 2008 |
| 92 |
Re: [oiic-formation-discuss] OASIS Guidelines to Writing ConformanceClauses |
2 |
Jun 2008 |
| 93 |
Summary of some "profiles" usage and ideas |
2 |
Jun 2008 |
| 94 |
Re: [oiic-formation-discuss] List of ODF interop issues that need to beaddressed -- Electronic signatures |
2 |
Jun 2008 |
| 95 |
The basic skeleton of an architecture for profiles |
2 |
Jun 2008 |
| 96 |
Purpose of List |
2 |
Jun 2008 |
| 97 |
Hijacked? |
2 |
Jun 2008 |
| 98 |
Profile of ODF + PDF |
2 |
Jun 2008 |
| 99 |
ODF version in the charter,was Re: [oiic-formation-discuss] My perspective. display perferct? |
2 |
Jul 2008 |
| 100 |
Re: [oiic-formation-discuss] ODF version in the charter, was Re:[oiic-formation-discuss] My perspective. display perferct? |
2 |
Jul 2008 |
| 101 |
Re: [oiic-formation-discuss] ODF version in the charter, was Re: [oiic-formation-discuss] My perspective. display perferct? |
2 |
Jul 2008 |
| 102 |
Re: draft proposal 0.3 - Deliverables |
2 |
Jul 2008 |
| 103 |
More about test case metadata |
2 |
Jul 2008 |
| 104 |
test |
1 |
Jun 2008 |
| 105 |
New OASIS Discussion List: oiic-formation-discuss |
1 |
Jun 2008 |
| 106 |
OIIC / ODF and OASIS CAM specification |
1 |
Jun 2008 |
| 107 |
Interoperability |
1 |
Jun 2008 |
| 108 |
Related Resources |
1 |
Jun 2008 |
| 109 |
Re: [oiic-formation-discuss] (1)(e) Specification of the IPR Mode underwhich the TC will operate. |
1 |
Jun 2008 |
| 110 |
Acid Tests (was: Re: [oiic-formation-discuss] Interoperability versusConformity) |
1 |
Jun 2008 |
| 111 |
Re: [oiic-formation-discuss] Acid Tests (was: Re: [oiic-formation-discuss] Interoperabilityversus Conformity) |
1 |
Jun 2008 |
| 112 |
Pixel Perfection (was: Re: [oiic-formation-discuss] (1)(f) and (1)(g) --audience and working language) |
1 |
Jun 2008 |
| 113 |
Re: [oiic-formation-discuss] Pixel Perfection (was: Re: [oiic-formation-discuss] (1)(f) and (1)(g) -- audience and working language) |
1 |
Jun 2008 |
| 114 |
Re: [oiic-formation-discuss] (1)(d) A list of deliverables, withprojected completion dates. |
1 |
Jun 2008 |
| 115 |
Re: [oiic-formation-discuss] (1)(d) A list of deliverables, with projected completion dates. |
1 |
Jun 2008 |
| 116 |
List growth and new subscribers |
1 |
Jun 2008 |
| 117 |
Re: [oiic-formation-discuss] MARBUX POINT OF ORDER, OBJECTION, AND SUGGESTIONS No. 1 |
1 |
Jun 2008 |
| 118 |
Re: [oiic-formation-discuss] MARBUX POINT OF ORDER,OBJECTION, AND SUGGESTIONS No. 1 |
1 |
Jun 2008 |
| 119 |
Re: [oiic-formation-discuss] (1)(d) A list of deliverables, withprojected completion dates. |
1 |
Jun 2008 |
| 120 |
Another comment, and a .gov constraint on interop. |
1 |
Jun 2008 |
| 121 |
Interop with other standards |
1 |
Jun 2008 |
| 122 |
CDRF |
1 |
Jun 2008 |
| 123 |
Re: [oiic-formation-discuss] Another comment, and a .gov constraint oninterop. |
1 |
Jun 2008 |
| 124 |
The conduct of this list |
1 |
Jun 2008 |
| 125 |
CDRF-like wrapper to handle elements via profile whitelists |
1 |
Jun 2008 |
| 126 |
TC Charter |
1 |
Jun 2008 |
| 127 |
Implementation vs. result (CDRF, profiles, et al.) |
1 |
Jun 2008 |
| 128 |
Question 2(a) Identification of Similar work |
1 |
Jun 2008 |
| 129 |
irc |
1 |
Jun 2008 |
| 130 |
Deliverables. Summary. |
1 |
Jun 2008 |
| 131 |
ODF compatibility, alt. CDRF standards (was: The importance to users of documents looking the same) |
1 |
Jun 2008 |
| 132 |
RE: [oiic-formation-discuss] The importance to users of documents looking the same |
1 |
Jun 2008 |
| 133 |
Profiles -- How much to detail in the charter? |
1 |
Jun 2008 |
| 134 |
Bedtime reading. |
1 |
Jun 2008 |
| 135 |
Re: [oiic-formation-discuss] Profiles -- How much to detail in thecharter? |
1 |
Jun 2008 |
| 136 |
The 80K pound gorilla .. let's keep the baby |
1 |
Jun 2008 |
| 137 |
Open formula group, and getting ahead of ourselves? |
1 |
Jun 2008 |
| 138 |
Text archive creator script available |
1 |
Jun 2008 |
| 139 |
Re: [oiic-formation-discuss] Joining the new TC -- Who is in,who is out? |
1 |
Jun 2008 |
| 140 |
Re: [oiic-formation-discuss] Open formula group, and getting ahead ofourselves? |
1 |
Jun 2008 |
| 141 |
Re: [oiic-formation-discuss] #oiic IRC Channel now being logged and archived |
1 |
Jun 2008 |
| 142 |
Re: [oiic-formation-discuss] List of ODF interop issues that needto be addressed -- Electronic signatures |
1 |
Jun 2008 |
| 143 |
Canonical mappings.. let's start! |
1 |
Jun 2008 |
| 144 |
Re: [oiic-formation-discuss] Implementation, Interoperability andConformance |
1 |
Jun 2008 |
| 145 |
OASIS Mailing List Policy and User Unsubscribed from the List |
1 |
Jun 2008 |
| 146 |
RE: [oiic-formation-discuss] My perspective (purpose ofTCs?) |
1 |
Jun 2008 |
| 147 |
Re: [oiic-formation-discuss] ODF version in the charter, was Re: [oiic-formation-discuss] Myperspective. display perferct? |
1 |
Jul 2008 |
| 148 |
Re: [oiic-formation-discuss] Reason and example arguing for the use of anODF (or XML) canonical form |
1 |
Jul 2008 |
| 149 |
42 days gone |
1 |
Jul 2008 |
| 150 |
IRC Log |
1 |
Jul 2008 |
| 151 |
Re: [oiic-formation-discuss] TC formation proposal: Central registry |
1 |
Jul 2008 |
| 152 |
Deliverables. charter version 1.1 |
1 |
Jul 2008 |
| 153 |
Re: [oiic-formation-discuss] Draft Interoperability and Conformance TCformation proposal (0.3) |
1 |
Jul 2008 |
| 154 |
Closure of Discussion List |
1 |
Sep 2008 |
