oiic-formation-discuss

← back

864 messages · 127 threads

# Subject From Date
00000 test Mary McRae 2008-06-02 21:04
00001 New OASIS Discussion List: oiic-formation-discuss Mary McRae 2008-06-02 21:30
00002 OIIC / ODF and OASIS CAM specification David RR Webber \(XML\) 2008-06-03 00:41
00003 Welcome! [email protected] 2008-06-03 15:40
00004 RE: [oiic-formation-discuss] Welcome! David RR Webber \(XML\) 2008-06-03 17:37
00005 Hello from Covington! Patrick Durusau 2008-06-03 17:53
00006 Re: [oiic-formation-discuss] Welcome! Bart Hanssens 2008-06-03 18:12
00007 Re: [oiic-formation-discuss] Welcome! Dave Pawson 2008-06-03 18:14
00008 RE: [oiic-formation-discuss] Hello from Covington! David RR Webber \(XML\) 2008-06-03 19:13
00009 Re: [oiic-formation-discuss] Hello from Covington! Patrick Durusau 2008-06-03 19:19
00010 Re: [oiic-formation-discuss] Welcome! Ian Lynch 2008-06-03 20:23
00011 RE: [oiic-formation-discuss] Welcome! [email protected] 2008-06-04 17:20
00012 Re: [oiic-formation-discuss] Welcome! Dave Pawson 2008-06-04 17:27
00013 RE: [oiic-formation-discuss] Welcome! David RR Webber \(XML\) 2008-06-04 17:56
00014 RE: [oiic-formation-discuss] Welcome! David RR Webber \(XML\) 2008-06-04 18:05
00015 Re: [oiic-formation-discuss] Welcome! Dave Pawson 2008-06-05 06:40
00016 Re: [oiic-formation-discuss] Welcome! [email protected] 2008-06-05 13:59
00017 Re: [oiic-formation-discuss] Welcome! Dave Pawson 2008-06-05 14:13
00018 Re: [oiic-formation-discuss] Welcome! [email protected] 2008-06-05 17:52
00019 RE: [oiic-formation-discuss] Welcome! David RR Webber \(XML\) 2008-06-05 20:39
00020 Re: [oiic-formation-discuss] Welcome! Dave Pawson 2008-06-06 05:56
00021 What are we validating and why? David RR Webber \(XML\) 2008-06-06 17:02
00022 Re: [oiic-formation-discuss] What are we validating and why? Bart Hanssens 2008-06-06 18:07
00023 Re: [oiic-formation-discuss] What are we validating and why? Dave Pawson 2008-06-06 19:00
00024 Re: [oiic-formation-discuss] What are we validating and why? [email protected] 2008-06-06 20:17
00025 RE: [oiic-formation-discuss] What are we validating and why? David RR Webber \(XML\) 2008-06-06 21:21
00026 Re: [oiic-formation-discuss] What are we validating and why? Dave Pawson 2008-06-07 05:56
00027 Re: [oiic-formation-discuss] What are we validating and why? Dave Pawson 2008-06-07 06:01
00028 Draft proposal, or brain dump Dave Pawson 2008-06-07 13:41
00029 RE: [oiic-formation-discuss] What are we validating and why? David RR Webber \(XML\) 2008-06-08 17:39
00030 What is interoperability anyway / really? David RR Webber \(XML\) 2008-06-08 17:57
00031 Re: [oiic-formation-discuss] What is interoperability anyway / really? Shawn 2008-06-08 19:17
00032 Interoperability versus Conformity [email protected] 2008-06-08 19:57
00033 Re: [oiic-formation-discuss] Draft proposal, or brain dump [email protected] 2008-06-08 19:57
00034 Experts needed [email protected] 2008-06-08 19:57
00035 Re: [oiic-formation-discuss] Experts needed Charles-H. Schulz 2008-06-08 21:56
00036 Re: [oiic-formation-discuss] Experts needed Matthew Holloway 2008-06-08 22:03
00037 Re: [oiic-formation-discuss] Experts needed Peter Dolding 2008-06-08 23:49
00038 Re: [oiic-formation-discuss] Experts needed David Gerard 2008-06-08 23:55
00039 Re: [oiic-formation-discuss] Experts needed Peter Dolding 2008-06-09 00:31
00040 RE: [oiic-formation-discuss] Draft proposal, or brain dump David RR Webber \(XML\) 2008-06-09 01:47
00041 RE: [oiic-formation-discuss] Interoperability versus Conformity David RR Webber \(XML\) 2008-06-09 01:56
00042 RE: [oiic-formation-discuss] What is interoperability anyway / really? David RR Webber \(XML\) 2008-06-09 02:04
00043 Re: [oiic-formation-discuss] Experts needed David Gerard 2008-06-09 07:25
00044 Re: [oiic-formation-discuss] Interoperability versus Conformity Dave Pawson 2008-06-09 07:29
00045 Re: [oiic-formation-discuss] What is interoperability anyway / really? Dave Pawson 2008-06-09 07:39
00046 Re: [oiic-formation-discuss] What is interoperability anyway / really? Dave Pawson 2008-06-09 07:48
00047 Interoperability Dave Pawson 2008-06-09 11:56
00048 RE: [oiic-formation-discuss] Draft proposal, or brain dump Mary McRae 2008-06-09 12:34
00049 Re: [oiic-formation-discuss] Draft proposal, or brain dump Dave Pawson 2008-06-09 13:40
00050 RE: [oiic-formation-discuss] Draft proposal, or brain dump Mary McRae 2008-06-09 16:52
00051 Re: [oiic-formation-discuss] Draft proposal, or brain dump Henrik Sundberg 2008-06-09 16:58
00052 Re: [oiic-formation-discuss] Draft proposal, or brain dump David Gerard 2008-06-09 16:58
00053 Re: [oiic-formation-discuss] Draft proposal, or brain dump Sam Johnston 2008-06-09 17:50
00054 RE: [oiic-formation-discuss] Draft proposal, or brain dump Mary McRae 2008-06-09 18:25
00055 Re: [oiic-formation-discuss] Draft proposal, or brain dump Shawn 2008-06-09 18:40
00056 Re: [oiic-formation-discuss] Draft proposal, or brain dump Dave Pawson 2008-06-09 18:47
00057 Re: [oiic-formation-discuss] Draft proposal, or brain dump Bart Hanssens 2008-06-09 18:51
00058 RE: [oiic-formation-discuss] Draft proposal, or brain dump Mary McRae 2008-06-09 18:59
00059 ODF IIC Technical Committee Wiki (Google Apps at odfiic.org) Sam Johnston 2008-06-09 19:02
00060 RE: [oiic-formation-discuss] ODF IIC Technical Committee Wiki (Google Apps at odfiic.org) Mary McRae 2008-06-09 19:46
00061 Re: [oiic-formation-discuss] ODF IIC Technical Committee Wiki (Google Apps at odfiic.org) Sam Johnston 2008-06-09 19:55
00062 Re-focusing on the proposed Charter [email protected] 2008-06-09 20:02
00063 RE: [oiic-formation-discuss] ODF IIC Technical Committee Wiki (Google Apps at odfiic.org) Mary McRae 2008-06-09 20:29
00064 Re: [oiic-formation-discuss] Re-focusing on the proposed Charter Dave Pawson 2008-06-09 20:33
00065 Re: [oiic-formation-discuss] Re-focusing on the proposed Charter Sam Johnston 2008-06-09 21:33
00066 Re: [oiic-formation-discuss] ODF IIC Technical Committee Wiki (Google Apps at odfiic.org) Sam Johnston 2008-06-09 21:50
00067 Re: [oiic-formation-discuss] Interoperability versus Conformity [email protected] 2008-06-09 21:52
00068 Re: [oiic-formation-discuss] Interoperability versus Conformity marbux 2008-06-09 23:25
00069 Related Resources [email protected] 2008-06-10 00:58
00070 Re: [oiic-formation-discuss] Draft proposal, or brain dump [email protected] 2008-06-10 00:58
00071 Re: [oiic-formation-discuss] What is interoperability anyway / really? [email protected] 2008-06-10 00:58
00072 Re: [oiic-formation-discuss] Draft proposal, or brain dump [email protected] 2008-06-10 03:12
00073 Re: [oiic-formation-discuss] Re-focusing on the proposed Charter [email protected] 2008-06-10 03:12
00074 Re: [oiic-formation-discuss] Re-focusing on the proposed Charter [email protected] 2008-06-10 03:12
00075 Re: [oiic-formation-discuss] Interoperability versus Conformity [email protected] 2008-06-10 03:45
00076 Re: [oiic-formation-discuss] Interoperability versus Conformity Stuart A. Yeates 2008-06-10 09:34
00077 (1)(e) Specification of the IPR Mode under which the TC will operate. [email protected] 2008-06-10 16:14
00078 Re: [oiic-formation-discuss] (1)(e) Specification of the IPR Mode under which the TC will operate. Matthew Reingold 2008-06-10 17:04
00079 xml.com article Dave Pawson 2008-06-10 17:29
00080 Re: [oiic-formation-discuss] (1)(e) Specification of the IPR Modeunder which the TC will operate. Shawn 2008-06-10 17:39
00081 Question on references Shawn 2008-06-10 17:49
00082 Re: [oiic-formation-discuss] (1)(e) Specification of the IPR Modeunder which the TC will operate. Bart Hanssens 2008-06-10 17:56
00083 Re: [oiic-formation-discuss] (1)(e) Specification of the IPR Mode under which the TC will operate. Sam Johnston 2008-06-10 18:15
00084 Re: [oiic-formation-discuss] Question on references Bart Hanssens 2008-06-10 19:19
00085 Re: [oiic-formation-discuss] (1)(e) Specification of the IPR Mode underwhich the TC will operate. [email protected] 2008-06-10 23:09
00086 Re: [oiic-formation-discuss] xml.com article [email protected] 2008-06-10 23:09
00087 Re: [oiic-formation-discuss] Question on references [email protected] 2008-06-10 23:09
00088 Re: [oiic-formation-discuss] Interoperability versus Conformity marbux 2008-06-11 07:14
00089 Re: [oiic-formation-discuss] (1)(e) Specification of the IPR Modeunder which the TC will operate. Michael Brauer - Sun Germany - ham02 - Hamburg 2008-06-11 07:51
00090 Re: [oiic-formation-discuss] (1)(e) Specification of the IPR Mode under which the TC will operate. Jerome Davies 2008-06-11 08:37
00091 Re: [oiic-formation-discuss] (1)(e) Specification of the IPR Mode under which the TC will operate. "Dharles-I. Rchulz" 2008-06-11 11:56
00092 Re: [oiic-formation-discuss] Interoperability versus Conformity [email protected] 2008-06-11 13:45
00093 (1)(f) and (1)(g) -- audience and working language [email protected] 2008-06-11 13:45
00094 Re: [oiic-formation-discuss] (1)(f) and (1)(g) -- audience and working language David Gerard 2008-06-11 13:51
00095 Re: [oiic-formation-discuss] Interoperability versus Conformity David Gerard 2008-06-11 13:54
00096 Re: [oiic-formation-discuss] (1)(f) and (1)(g) -- audience and working language Sam Johnston 2008-06-11 13:57
00097 Re: [oiic-formation-discuss] Interoperability versus Conformity Sam Johnston 2008-06-11 14:10
00098 Re: [oiic-formation-discuss] (1)(f) and (1)(g) -- audience and workinglanguage [email protected] 2008-06-11 14:19
00099 Re: [oiic-formation-discuss] (1)(f) and (1)(g) -- audience and working language Sam Johnston 2008-06-11 14:39
00100 ODF Interoperability Presentation [email protected] 2008-06-11 14:42
00101 Re: [oiic-formation-discuss] Interoperability versus Conformity Matthew Reingold 2008-06-11 14:51
00102 Re: [oiic-formation-discuss] Interoperability versus Conformity Jerome Davies 2008-06-11 15:31
00103 Re: [oiic-formation-discuss] Interoperability versus Conformity Matthew Reingold 2008-06-11 15:49
00104 Re: [oiic-formation-discuss] Interoperability versus Conformity Jerome Davies 2008-06-11 16:10
00105 Re: [oiic-formation-discuss] Interoperability versus Conformity Matthew Reingold 2008-06-11 16:16
00106 Re: [oiic-formation-discuss] Interoperability versus Conformity [email protected] 2008-06-11 16:32
00107 Re: [oiic-formation-discuss] ODF Interoperability Presentation Dave Pawson 2008-06-11 17:05
00108 Re: [oiic-formation-discuss] Interoperability versus Conformity Dave Pawson 2008-06-11 17:09
00109 Group effort "QB Rchinagl" 2008-06-11 17:13
00110 Re: [oiic-formation-discuss] Interoperability versus Conformity [email protected] 2008-06-11 17:16
00111 Re: [oiic-formation-discuss] ODF Interoperability Presentation [email protected] 2008-06-11 18:15
00112 Re: [oiic-formation-discuss] Group effort Rhawn 2008-06-11 18:16
00113 Re: [oiic-formation-discuss] ODF Interoperability Presentation Matthew Reingold 2008-06-11 18:19
00114 Re: [oiic-formation-discuss] Interoperability versus Conformity Sam Johnston 2008-06-11 18:31
00115 Re: [oiic-formation-discuss] Interoperability versus Conformity David Gerard 2008-06-11 18:45
00116 Re: [oiic-formation-discuss] (1)(f) and (1)(g) -- audience and working language Sam Johnston 2008-06-11 18:46
00117 Fwd: [oiic-formation-discuss] Group effort David Gerard 2008-06-11 18:52
00118 Re: Fwd: [oiic-formation-discuss] Group effort Shawn 2008-06-11 19:01
00119 Re: [oiic-formation-discuss] Group effort Matthew Reingold 2008-06-11 19:09
00120 Re: [oiic-formation-discuss] Group effort [email protected] 2008-06-11 20:18
00121 Re: [oiic-formation-discuss] (1)(f) and (1)(g) -- audience and working language Matthew Reingold 2008-06-11 20:56
00122 Re: [oiic-formation-discuss] (1)(f) and (1)(g) -- audience and workinglanguage [email protected] 2008-06-11 21:44
00123 Acid Tests (was: Re: [oiic-formation-discuss] Interoperability versusConformity) [email protected] 2008-06-11 21:44
00124 Re: [oiic-formation-discuss] Interoperability versus Conformity [email protected] 2008-06-11 21:45
00125 Re: [oiic-formation-discuss] (1)(f) and (1)(g) -- audience and workinglanguage [email protected] 2008-06-11 21:50
00126 Re: [oiic-formation-discuss] (1)(f) and (1)(g) -- audience and working language Sam Johnston 2008-06-11 22:04
00127 Caution and Disclaimer on Interoperability jose lorenzo 2008-06-11 22:32
00128 Re: [oiic-formation-discuss] (1)(f) and (1)(g) -- audience and working language "Ram Kohnston" 2008-06-11 22:40
00129 Re: [oiic-formation-discuss] ODF Interoperability Presentation [email protected] 2008-06-11 23:40
00130 Re: [oiic-formation-discuss] Interoperability versus Conformity [email protected] 2008-06-11 23:40
00131 Re: [oiic-formation-discuss] Interoperability versus Conformity [email protected] 2008-06-11 23:40
00132 Re: [oiic-formation-discuss] Interoperability versus Conformity [email protected] 2008-06-11 23:40
00133 Re: [oiic-formation-discuss] Caution and Disclaimer on Interoperability [email protected] 2008-06-12 00:19
00134 Re: [oiic-formation-discuss] (1)(f) and (1)(g) -- audience and workinglanguage Shawn 2008-06-12 01:44
00135 Microsoft, Intel now ODF TC members? marbux 2008-06-12 03:36
00136 Re: [oiic-formation-discuss] Caution and Disclaimer on Interoperability jose lorenzo 2008-06-12 04:26
00137 Re: [oiic-formation-discuss] Caution and Disclaimer on Interoperability Stuart A. Yeates 2008-06-12 06:10
00138 Re: [oiic-formation-discuss] Group effort - how we talk. Dave Pawson 2008-06-12 07:00
00139 Re: [oiic-formation-discuss] (1)(f) and (1)(g) -- audience and working language Dave Pawson 2008-06-12 07:02
00140 Re: [oiic-formation-discuss] (1)(f) and (1)(g) -- audience and working language Dave Pawson 2008-06-12 07:11
00141 Re: [oiic-formation-discuss] Caution and Disclaimer on Interoperability Dave Pawson 2008-06-12 07:18
00142 Re: [oiic-formation-discuss] Caution and Disclaimer on Interoperability Dave Pawson 2008-06-12 07:35
00143 Re: [oiic-formation-discuss] (1)(f) and (1)(g) -- audience and workinglanguage Shawn 2008-06-12 08:47
00144 Re: [oiic-formation-discuss] (1)(f) and (1)(g) -- audience and working language David Gerard 2008-06-12 09:10
00145 Re: [oiic-formation-discuss] Group effort - how we talk. Sam Johnston 2008-06-12 09:35
00146 Re: [oiic-formation-discuss] (1)(f) and (1)(g) -- audience and working language Sam Johnston 2008-06-12 09:55
00147 Re: [oiic-formation-discuss] (1)(f) and (1)(g) -- audience and working language Dave Pawson 2008-06-12 10:00
00148 Re: [oiic-formation-discuss] (1)(f) and (1)(g) -- audience and working language Sam Johnston 2008-06-12 10:05
00149 Re: [oiic-formation-discuss] (1)(f) and (1)(g) -- audience and workinglanguage Maximilian Odendahl 2008-06-12 10:11
00150 Re: [oiic-formation-discuss] (1)(f) and (1)(g) -- audience and working language Dave Pawson 2008-06-12 10:23
00151 Re: [oiic-formation-discuss] (1)(f) and (1)(g) -- audience and working language David Gerard 2008-06-12 10:23
00152 Re: [oiic-formation-discuss] Caution and Disclaimer on Interoperability marbux 2008-06-12 11:29
00153 Re: [oiic-formation-discuss] Acid Tests (was: Re: [oiic-formation-discuss] Interoperability versus Conformity) Peter Dolding 2008-06-12 11:49
00154 Re: [oiic-formation-discuss] Caution and Disclaimer on Interoperability Dave Pawson 2008-06-12 12:05
00155 Re: [oiic-formation-discuss] (1)(f) and (1)(g) -- audience and working language Peter Dolding 2008-06-12 12:28
00156 Re: [oiic-formation-discuss] Acid Tests (was: Re: [oiic-formation-discuss] Interoperability versus Conformity) Dave Pawson 2008-06-12 12:34
00157 Re: [oiic-formation-discuss] Acid Tests (was: Re: [oiic-formation-discuss] Interoperability versus Conformity) Luc Bollen 2008-06-12 12:36
00158 Re: [oiic-formation-discuss] (1)(f) and (1)(g) -- audience and working language Dave Pawson 2008-06-12 12:44
00159 Re: [oiic-formation-discuss] Acid Tests (was: Re: [oiic-formation-discuss] Interoperability versus Conformity) Sam Johnston 2008-06-12 12:48
00160 RE: [oiic-formation-discuss] Microsoft, Intel now ODF TC members? Mary McRae 2008-06-12 12:49
00161 Re: [oiic-formation-discuss] Acid Tests (was: Re: [oiic-formation-discuss] Interoperability versus Conformity) Dave Pawson 2008-06-12 12:49
00162 Re: [oiic-formation-discuss] (1)(f) and (1)(g) -- audience and working language David Gerard 2008-06-12 12:50
00163 Re: [oiic-formation-discuss] (1)(f) and (1)(g) -- audience and working language Sam Johnston 2008-06-12 12:53
00164 Re: [oiic-formation-discuss] (1)(f) and (1)(g) -- audience and working language Dave Pawson 2008-06-12 13:00
00165 Re: [oiic-formation-discuss] Group effort - how we talk. Dave Pawson 2008-06-12 13:21
00166 Re: [oiic-formation-discuss] (1)(f) and (1)(g) -- audience and working language Dave Pawson 2008-06-12 13:21
00167 RE: [oiic-formation-discuss] Group effort - how we talk. Mary McRae 2008-06-12 13:21
00168 Re: [oiic-formation-discuss] Acid Tests (was: Re: [oiic-formation-discuss] Interoperability versus Conformity) Luc Bollen 2008-06-12 13:26
00169 Re: [oiic-formation-discuss] Group effort - how we talk. Sam Johnston 2008-06-12 13:28
00170 Re: [oiic-formation-discuss] Group effort - how we talk. David Gerard 2008-06-12 13:28
00171 Re: [oiic-formation-discuss] Acid Tests (was: Re: [oiic-formation-discuss] Interoperability versus Conformity) Dave Pawson 2008-06-12 13:32
00172 Re: [oiic-formation-discuss] (1)(f) and (1)(g) -- audience and working language Sam Johnston 2008-06-12 13:40
00173 RE: [oiic-formation-discuss] Group effort - how we talk. Mary McRae 2008-06-12 13:42
00174 Re: [oiic-formation-discuss] (1)(f) and (1)(g) -- audience and working language Dave Pawson 2008-06-12 13:49
00175 Re: [oiic-formation-discuss] Group effort - how we talk. Dave Pawson 2008-06-12 13:53
00176 Re: [oiic-formation-discuss] (1)(f) and (1)(g) -- audience and workinglanguage [email protected] 2008-06-12 13:53
00177 Re: [oiic-formation-discuss] Microsoft, Intel now ODF TC members? [email protected] 2008-06-12 13:53
00178 Re: [oiic-formation-discuss] Acid Tests (was: Re: [oiic-formation-discuss] Interoperabilityversus Conformity) [email protected] 2008-06-12 13:54
00179 Re: [oiic-formation-discuss] Caution and Disclaimer on Interoperability [email protected] 2008-06-12 13:54
00180 Re: [oiic-formation-discuss] Caution and Disclaimer on Interoperability [email protected] 2008-06-12 13:54
00181 Re: [oiic-formation-discuss] (1)(f) and (1)(g) -- audience and working language David Gerard 2008-06-12 13:59
00182 Re: [oiic-formation-discuss] Caution and Disclaimer on Interoperability marbux 2008-06-12 14:03
00183 Re: [oiic-formation-discuss] Acid Tests (was: Re: [oiic-formation-discuss] Interoperability versus Conformity) Dave Pawson 2008-06-12 14:03
00184 Re: [oiic-formation-discuss] Group effort - how we talk. Sam Johnston 2008-06-12 14:09
00185 Re: [oiic-formation-discuss] Acid Tests (was: Re: [oiic-formation-discuss] Interoperability versus Conformity) David Gerard 2008-06-12 14:12
00186 Re: [oiic-formation-discuss] Acid Tests (was: Re: [oiic-formation-discuss] Interoperability versus Conformity) Sam Johnston 2008-06-12 14:20
00187 Re: [oiic-formation-discuss] Caution and Disclaimer on Interoperability Dave Pawson 2008-06-12 14:31
00188 Pixel Perfection (was: Re: [oiic-formation-discuss] (1)(f) and (1)(g) --audience and working language) [email protected] 2008-06-12 14:33
00189 Re: [oiic-formation-discuss] Acid Tests Dave Pawson 2008-06-12 14:42
00190 Re: [oiic-formation-discuss] Acid Tests David Gerard 2008-06-12 14:48
00191 Re: [oiic-formation-discuss] Pixel Perfection (was: Re: [oiic-formation-discuss] (1)(f) and (1)(g) -- audience and working language) Dave Pawson 2008-06-12 14:57
00192 Re: [oiic-formation-discuss] Acid Tests Sam Johnston 2008-06-12 15:11
00193 Re: [oiic-formation-discuss] Caution and Disclaimer on Interoperability marbux 2008-06-12 15:38
00194 Re: [oiic-formation-discuss] Acid Tests [email protected] 2008-06-12 17:18
00195 Re: [oiic-formation-discuss] Group effort - how we talk. Matthew Reingold 2008-06-12 17:23
00196 Re: [oiic-formation-discuss] Acid Tests Matthew Reingold 2008-06-12 17:42
00197 Re: [oiic-formation-discuss] Microsoft, Intel now ODF TC members? marbux 2008-06-12 17:47
00198 Re: [oiic-formation-discuss] Microsoft, Intel now ODF TC members? marbux 2008-06-12 17:51
00199 Re: [oiic-formation-discuss] Acid Tests Dave Pawson 2008-06-12 17:57
00200 (1)(d) A list of deliverables, with projected completion dates. [email protected] 2008-06-12 18:06
00201 Re: [oiic-formation-discuss] Acid Tests [email protected] 2008-06-12 18:15
00202 Re: [oiic-formation-discuss] (1)(d) A list of deliverables, with projected completion dates. Norbert Bollow 2008-06-12 18:55
00203 RE: [oiic-formation-discuss] Group effort - how we talk. Mary McRae 2008-06-12 19:26
00204 Re: [oiic-formation-discuss] (1)(d) A list of deliverables, withprojected completion dates. Bart Hanssens 2008-06-12 19:46
00205 Re: [oiic-formation-discuss] Acid Tests Shawn 2008-06-12 19:54
00206 Re: [oiic-formation-discuss] (1)(d) A list of deliverables, with projectedcompletion dates. [email protected] 2008-06-12 19:59
00207 Re: [oiic-formation-discuss] (1)(d) A list of deliverables, with projectedcompletion dates. [email protected] 2008-06-12 20:02
00208 Re: [oiic-formation-discuss] Acid Tests jose lorenzo 2008-06-12 21:28
00209 Re: [oiic-formation-discuss] (1)(d) A list of deliverables, with projectedcompletion dates. Norbert Bollow 2008-06-12 21:59
00210 Re: [oiic-formation-discuss] Acid Tests Shawn 2008-06-12 22:00
00211 Re: [oiic-formation-discuss] Acid Tests jose lorenzo 2008-06-12 22:18
00212 Re: [oiic-formation-discuss] Group effort - how we talk. Luc Bollen 2008-06-12 22:28
00213 Re: [oiic-formation-discuss] Acid Tests [email protected] 2008-06-12 22:29
00214 Fwd: [oiic-formation-discuss] Acid Tests Luc Bollen 2008-06-12 22:34
00215 Re: [oiic-formation-discuss] Acid Tests Bart Hanssens 2008-06-12 22:35
00216 Re: [oiic-formation-discuss] Acid Tests Matthew Reingold 2008-06-12 22:39
00217 Re: [oiic-formation-discuss] Group effort - how we talk. Sam Johnston 2008-06-13 00:02
00218 Re: [oiic-formation-discuss] Caution and Disclaimer on Interoperability "Konathan Meffler" 2008-06-13 00:38
00219 Re: [oiic-formation-discuss] (1)(d) A list of deliverables, with projected completion dates. Sam Johnston 2008-06-13 01:07
00220 Re: [oiic-formation-discuss] Acid Tests "Ram Kohnston" 2008-06-13 01:35
00221 Re: [oiic-formation-discuss] (1)(d) A list of deliverables, with projected completion dates. Dave Pawson 2008-06-13 06:29
00222 Reference implementation. Layout perfect. Dave Pawson 2008-06-13 06:49
00223 Re: [oiic-formation-discuss] (1)(d) A list of deliverables, with projected completion dates. Dave Pawson 2008-06-13 07:00
00224 Re: [oiic-formation-discuss] Acid Tests Luc Bollen 2008-06-13 07:25
00225 Re: [oiic-formation-discuss] Acid Tests Dave Pawson 2008-06-13 07:37
00226 Re: [oiic-formation-discuss] (1)(d) A list of deliverables, with projected completion dates. Dave Pawson 2008-06-13 07:54
00227 Re: [oiic-formation-discuss] Acid Tests Luc Bollen 2008-06-13 07:55
00228 Re: [oiic-formation-discuss] Acid Tests Dave Pawson 2008-06-13 08:09
00229 Re: [oiic-formation-discuss] Acid Tests Luc Bollen 2008-06-13 08:33
00230 Re: [oiic-formation-discuss] (1)(f) and (1)(g) -- audience and working language Peter Dolding 2008-06-13 08:51
00231 Re: [oiic-formation-discuss] (1)(f) and (1)(g) -- audience and working language Dave Pawson 2008-06-13 09:21
00232 Thoughts on interop Simon Calderson 2008-06-13 10:02
00233 Re: [oiic-formation-discuss] (1)(d) A list of deliverables,with projected completion dates. Michael Brauer - Sun Germany - ham02 - Hamburg 2008-06-13 11:39
00234 Re: [oiic-formation-discuss] (1)(f) and (1)(g) -- audience and working language Peter Dolding 2008-06-13 12:27
00235 Re: [oiic-formation-discuss] Thoughts on interop Dave Pawson 2008-06-13 12:29
00236 Re: [oiic-formation-discuss] Reference implementation. Layout perfect. [email protected] 2008-06-13 12:39
00237 Re: [oiic-formation-discuss] (1)(d) A list of deliverables, with projected completion dates. Dave Pawson 2008-06-13 12:44
00238 Re: [oiic-formation-discuss] (1)(f) and (1)(g) -- audience and working language Dave Pawson 2008-06-13 12:57
00239 Re: [oiic-formation-discuss] Thoughts on interop Simon Calderson 2008-06-13 13:02
00240 Re: [oiic-formation-discuss] Reference implementation. Layout perfect. Dave Pawson 2008-06-13 13:07
00241 Re: [oiic-formation-discuss] Thoughts on interop Dave Pawson 2008-06-13 13:12
00242 Re: [oiic-formation-discuss] (1)(d) A list of deliverables,with projected completion dates. Michael Brauer - Sun Germany - ham02 - Hamburg 2008-06-13 13:18
00243 Re: [oiic-formation-discuss] Thoughts on interop Simon Calderson 2008-06-13 13:19
00244 Re: [oiic-formation-discuss] (1)(d) A list of deliverables, with projected completion dates. Dave Pawson 2008-06-13 13:22
00245 Classic test case Dave Pawson 2008-06-13 13:38
00246 Re: [oiic-formation-discuss] Acid Tests Sam Johnston 2008-06-13 14:02
00247 Re: [oiic-formation-discuss] Thoughts on interop [email protected] 2008-06-13 14:30
00248 Re: [oiic-formation-discuss] Classic test case Sam Johnston 2008-06-13 15:01
00249 Re: [oiic-formation-discuss] Thoughts on interop Dave Pawson 2008-06-13 15:07
00250 Re: [oiic-formation-discuss] (1)(d) A list of deliverables, with projectedcompletion dates. [email protected] 2008-06-13 15:23
00251 Re: [oiic-formation-discuss] (1)(d) A list of deliverables, with projectedcompletion dates. [email protected] 2008-06-13 15:23
00252 Re: [oiic-formation-discuss] Classic test case [email protected] 2008-06-13 16:16
00253 Level of detail needed in a TC Charter [email protected] 2008-06-13 16:16
00254 Re: [oiic-formation-discuss] (1)(d) A list of deliverables, with projected completion dates. Dave Pawson 2008-06-13 16:19
00255 Re: [oiic-formation-discuss] Level of detail needed in a TC Charter Dave Pawson 2008-06-13 16:52
00256 Re: [oiic-formation-discuss] (1)(d) A list of deliverables, with projected completion dates. Jerome Davies 2008-06-13 17:35
00257 Re: [oiic-formation-discuss] Level of detail needed in a TC Charter Jerome Davies 2008-06-13 17:39
00258 [Re: [oiic-formation-discuss] Reference implementation. Layout perfect.] Shawn 2008-06-13 17:46
00259 Re: [Re: [oiic-formation-discuss] Reference implementation. Layout perfect.] [email protected] 2008-06-13 18:51
00260 Re: [oiic-formation-discuss] (1)(d) A list of deliverables, with projected completion dates. marbux 2008-06-13 19:36
00261 Re: [oiic-formation-discuss] Classic test case Sam Johnston 2008-06-13 20:39
00262 Re: [oiic-formation-discuss] (1)(d) A list of deliverables, with projectedcompletion dates. [email protected] 2008-06-13 21:12
00263 Re: [oiic-formation-discuss] (1)(d) A list of deliverables, with projectedcompletion dates. [email protected] 2008-06-13 21:12
00264 List growth and new subscribers [email protected] 2008-06-13 21:36
00265 Re: [oiic-formation-discuss] Caution and Disclaimer on Interoperability jose lorenzo 2008-06-13 22:20
00266 Re: [oiic-formation-discuss] (1)(d) A list of deliverables, with projectedcompletion dates. [email protected] 2008-06-13 22:27
00267 Re: [oiic-formation-discuss] Caution and Disclaimer on Interoperability jose lorenzo 2008-06-13 22:30
00268 Re: [oiic-formation-discuss] Caution and Disclaimer on Interoperability [email protected] 2008-06-13 22:49
00269 Re: [oiic-formation-discuss] (1)(d) A list of deliverables, with projected completion dates. Sam Johnston 2008-06-14 01:54
00270 Re: [oiic-formation-discuss] Level of detail needed in a TC Charter Dave Pawson 2008-06-14 07:07
00271 Re: [Re: [oiic-formation-discuss] Reference implementation. Layout perfect.] Dave Pawson 2008-06-14 07:13
00272 Re: [office-accessibility] Re: [oiic-formation-discuss] (1)(d) A list of deliverables, with projected completion dates. Dave Pawson 2008-06-14 07:29
00273 MARBUX POINT OF ORDER, OBJECTION, AND SUGGESTIONS No. 1 marbux 2008-06-14 09:53
00274 Re: [oiic-formation-discuss] MARBUX POINT OF ORDER, OBJECTION, AND SUGGESTIONS No. 1 Simon Calderson 2008-06-14 10:29
00275 Re: [oiic-formation-discuss] Caution and Disclaimer on Interoperability Peter Dolding 2008-06-14 10:43
00276 Re: [oiic-formation-discuss] MARBUX POINT OF ORDER, OBJECTION, ANDSUGGESTIONS No. 1 [email protected] 2008-06-14 11:01
00277 Re: [oiic-formation-discuss] Level of detail needed in a TC Charter [email protected] 2008-06-14 11:01
00278 Re: [oiic-formation-discuss] Level of detail needed in a TC Charter Dave Pawson 2008-06-14 11:27
00279 Re: [Re: [oiic-formation-discuss] Reference implementation. Layout perfect.] Sam Johnston 2008-06-14 11:35
00280 Re: [oiic-formation-discuss] Caution and Disclaimer on Interoperability jose lorenzo 2008-06-14 12:36
00281 "Strictly conforming" is not related to "interoperable" jose lorenzo 2008-06-14 13:37
00282 Re: [oiic-formation-discuss] Level of detail needed in a TC Charter Matthew Reingold 2008-06-14 13:49
00283 Re: [oiic-formation-discuss] Caution and Disclaimer on Interoperability Dave Pawson 2008-06-14 20:23
00284 Re: [oiic-formation-discuss] "Strictly conforming" is not related to "interoperable" Dave Pawson 2008-06-14 20:28
00285 Re: [oiic-formation-discuss] Level of detail needed in a TC Charter Dave Pawson 2008-06-14 20:42
00286 Re: [oiic-formation-discuss] Level of detail needed in a TC Charter marbux 2008-06-14 21:56
00287 Re: [oiic-formation-discuss] "Strictly conforming" is not related to "interoperable" jose lorenzo 2008-06-14 22:31
00288 Re: [oiic-formation-discuss] Level of detail needed in a TC Charter marbux 2008-06-14 22:54
00289 Re: [oiic-formation-discuss] Level of detail needed in a TC Charter marbux 2008-06-14 23:43
00290 Re: [oiic-formation-discuss] Level of detail needed in a TC Charter Shawn 2008-06-15 00:14
00291 Re: [oiic-formation-discuss] MARBUX POINT OF ORDER, OBJECTION, AND SUGGESTIONS No. 1 marbux 2008-06-15 00:18
00292 Re: [oiic-formation-discuss] MARBUX POINT OF ORDER, OBJECTION, AND SUGGESTIONS No. 1 marbux 2008-06-15 01:02
00293 Re: [oiic-formation-discuss] MARBUX POINT OF ORDER, OBJECTION, AND SUGGESTIONS No. 1 marbux 2008-06-15 01:12
00294 Re: [oiic-formation-discuss] Level of detail needed in a TC Charter [email protected] 2008-06-15 01:47
00295 Marbux: Request for more detail Shawn 2008-06-15 02:34
00296 Re: [oiic-formation-discuss] MARBUX POINT OF ORDER, OBJECTION, ANDSUGGESTIONS No. 1 Pamela Jones 2008-06-15 03:38
00297 Re: [oiic-formation-discuss] MARBUX POINT OF ORDER, OBJECTION, AND SUGGESTIONS No. 1 marbux 2008-06-15 03:48
00298 Re: [oiic-formation-discuss] MARBUX POINT OF ORDER, OBJECTION, AND SUGGESTIONS No. 1 Vic 2008-06-15 03:55
00299 Re: [oiic-formation-discuss] MARBUX POINT OF ORDER, OBJECTION, ANDSUGGESTIONS No. 1 Shawn 2008-06-15 04:19
00300 Re: [Re: [oiic-formation-discuss] Reference implementation. Layout perfect.] Dave Pawson 2008-06-15 07:28
00301 Re: [oiic-formation-discuss] MARBUX POINT OF ORDER, OBJECTION, AND SUGGESTIONS No. 1 marbux 2008-06-15 07:43
00302 Re: [oiic-formation-discuss] "Strictly conforming" is not related to "interoperable" Dave Pawson 2008-06-15 07:48
00303 Re: [oiic-formation-discuss] Level of detail needed in a TC Charter Dave Pawson 2008-06-15 08:16
00304 Re: [oiic-formation-discuss] MARBUX POINT OF ORDER, OBJECTION, AND SUGGESTIONS No. 1 marbux 2008-06-15 08:22
00305 Moving forward Simon Calderson 2008-06-15 09:39
00306 Re: [oiic-formation-discuss] MARBUX POINT OF ORDER, OBJECTION, ANDSUGGESTIONS No. 1 Shawn 2008-06-15 09:59
00307 Re: [oiic-formation-discuss] MARBUX POINT OF ORDER, OBJECTION, AND SUGGESTIONS No. 1 David Gerard 2008-06-15 10:53
00308 Re: [oiic-formation-discuss] Caution and Disclaimer on Interoperability David Gerard 2008-06-15 11:14
00309 Re: [oiic-formation-discuss] MARBUX POINT OF ORDER, OBJECTION, AND SUGGESTIONS No. 1 marbux 2008-06-15 12:28
00310 Re: [oiic-formation-discuss] MARBUX POINT OF ORDER, OBJECTION, ANDSUGGESTIONS No. 1 Alan Lord 2008-06-15 14:10
00311 Re: [oiic-formation-discuss] MARBUX POINT OF ORDER, OBJECTION, AND SUGGESTIONS No. 1 Dave Pawson 2008-06-15 15:24
00312 Re: [oiic-formation-discuss] Level of detail needed in a TC Charter marbux 2008-06-15 15:24
00313 Re: [oiic-formation-discuss] MARBUX POINT OF ORDER, OBJECTION, AND SUGGESTIONS No. 1 marbux 2008-06-15 15:30
00314 Re: [oiic-formation-discuss] MARBUX POINT OF ORDER, OBJECTION, AND SUGGESTIONS No. 1 Sam Johnston 2008-06-15 16:54
00315 Re: [oiic-formation-discuss] MARBUX POINT OF ORDER,OBJECTION, AND SUGGESTIONS No. 1 Ted Powell 2008-06-15 19:18
00316 Re: [oiic-formation-discuss] MARBUX POINT OF ORDER, OBJECTION, AND SUGGESTIONS No. 1 Matthew Reingold 2008-06-15 19:40
00317 Re: [oiic-formation-discuss] Level of detail needed in a TC Charter Matthew Reingold 2008-06-15 19:47
00318 ODF Acid Test - Proof of Concept Sam Johnston 2008-06-16 00:34
00319 Re: [oiic-formation-discuss] Marbux: Request for more detail Matthew Reingold 2008-06-16 01:35
00320 Re: [oiic-formation-discuss] Marbux: Request for more detail Matthew Reingold 2008-06-16 01:35
00321 Re: [oiic-formation-discuss] ODF Acid Test - Proof of Concept Matthew Reingold 2008-06-16 01:39
00322 Re: [oiic-formation-discuss] Moving forward Sunny Dubey 2008-06-16 02:38
00323 Re: [oiic-formation-discuss] ODF Acid Test - Proof of Concept Matthew Holloway 2008-06-16 03:09
00324 Re: [oiic-formation-discuss] Marbux: Request for more detail Shawn 2008-06-16 03:27
00325 Reference implementation strikes gold jose lorenzo 2008-06-16 05:29
00326 Re: [oiic-formation-discuss] Marbux: Request for more detail Tom M. 2008-06-16 05:58
00327 Re: [oiic-formation-discuss] Reference implementation strikes gold jose lorenzo 2008-06-16 06:37
00328 Re: [oiic-formation-discuss] Reference implementation strikes gold jose lorenzo 2008-06-16 06:57
00329 Re: [oiic-formation-discuss] (1)(d) A list of deliverables,with projected completion dates. Michael Brauer - Sun Germany - ham02 - Hamburg 2008-06-16 06:58
00330 Re: [oiic-formation-discuss] (1)(d) A list of deliverables, with projected completion dates. Dave Pawson 2008-06-16 07:14
00331 Re: [oiic-formation-discuss] MARBUX POINT OF ORDER, OBJECTION, ANDSUGGESTIONS No. 1 Rob van Son 2008-06-16 07:57
00332 Re: [oiic-formation-discuss] (1)(d) A list of deliverables, withprojected completion dates. Sander Marechal 2008-06-16 08:44
00333 Re: [oiic-formation-discuss] MARBUX POINT OF ORDER, OBJECTION, ANDSUGGESTIONS No. 1 Sander Marechal 2008-06-16 08:44
00334 Re: [oiic-formation-discuss] MARBUX POINT OF ORDER, OBJECTION, ANDSUGGESTIONS No. 1 Sander Marechal 2008-06-16 08:45
00335 Re: [oiic-formation-discuss] Level of detail needed in a TC Charter [email protected] 2008-06-16 09:20
00336 Re: [oiic-formation-discuss] "Strictly conforming" is not related to "interoperable" [email protected] 2008-06-16 09:20
00337 Re: [oiic-formation-discuss] MARBUX POINT OF ORDER, OBJECTION, AND SUGGESTIONS No. 1 Dave Pawson 2008-06-16 09:25
00338 Re: [oiic-formation-discuss] MARBUX POINT OF ORDER, OBJECTION, AND SUGGESTIONS No. 1 Alexander Wright 2008-06-16 09:29
00339 Re: [oiic-formation-discuss] Level of detail needed in a TC Charter Dave Pawson 2008-06-16 09:30
00340 Re: [oiic-formation-discuss] MARBUX POINT OF ORDER, OBJECTION, AND SUGGESTIONS No. 1 marbux 2008-06-16 09:56
00341 Re: [oiic-formation-discuss] MARBUX POINT OF ORDER, OBJECTION, ANDSUGGESTIONS No. 1 Sander Marechal 2008-06-16 10:12
00342 Re: [oiic-formation-discuss] MARBUX POINT OF ORDER, OBJECTION, AND SUGGESTIONS No. 1 Dave Pawson 2008-06-16 10:22
00343 Re: [oiic-formation-discuss] MARBUX POINT OF ORDER, OBJECTION, AND SUGGESTIONS No. 1 marbux 2008-06-16 10:51
00344 Re: [oiic-formation-discuss] (1)(d) A list of deliverables,with projected completion dates. Michael Brauer - Sun Germany - ham02 - Hamburg 2008-06-16 11:11
00345 Re: [oiic-formation-discuss] Level of detail needed in a TC Charter [email protected] 2008-06-16 12:56
00346 Which is definitive odf? Dave Pawson 2008-06-16 14:23
00347 RE: [oiic-formation-discuss] Reference implementation. Layout perfect. Hurley, Garry \(L&I - OIT\) 2008-06-16 14:24
00348 RE: [oiic-formation-discuss] Classic test case Hurley, Garry \(L&I - OIT\) 2008-06-16 15:14
00349 Re: [oiic-formation-discuss] Reference implementation. Layout perfect. Dave Pawson 2008-06-16 15:14
00350 Re: [oiic-formation-discuss] Classic test case Dave Pawson 2008-06-16 15:19
00351 Another comment, and a .gov constraint on interop. Dave Pawson 2008-06-16 15:38
00352 RE: [oiic-formation-discuss] Reference implementation. Layout perfect. Hurley, Garry \(L&I - OIT\) 2008-06-16 15:40
00353 Re: [oiic-formation-discuss] MARBUX POINT OF ORDER, OBJECTION, AND SUGGESTIONS No. 1 marbux 2008-06-16 17:16
00354 Re: [oiic-formation-discuss] Level of detail needed in a TC Charter [email protected] 2008-06-16 17:26
00355 Re: [oiic-formation-discuss] MARBUX POINT OF ORDER, OBJECTION, ANDSUGGESTIONS No. 1 [email protected] 2008-06-16 17:26
00356 Re: [oiic-formation-discuss] Which is definitive odf? [email protected] 2008-06-16 17:26
00357 Interop with other standards [email protected] 2008-06-16 17:26
00358 Re: [oiic-formation-discuss] Level of detail needed in a TC Charter [email protected] 2008-06-16 17:26
00359 Re: [oiic-formation-discuss] Which is definitive odf? Dave Pawson 2008-06-16 17:33
00360 RE: [oiic-formation-discuss] Which is definitive odf? Hurley, Garry \(L&I - OIT\) 2008-06-16 17:51
00361 CDRF [email protected] 2008-06-16 18:11
00362 Re: [oiic-formation-discuss] Another comment, and a .gov constraint oninterop. [email protected] 2008-06-16 18:11
00363 Re: [oiic-formation-discuss] "Strictly conforming" is not related to "interoperable" jose lorenzo 2008-06-16 18:18
00364 Re: [oiic-formation-discuss] "Strictly conforming" is not related to "interoperable" jose lorenzo 2008-06-16 18:19
00365 Re: [oiic-formation-discuss] Which is definitive odf? Sam Johnston 2008-06-16 18:20
00366 Re: [oiic-formation-discuss] "Strictly conforming" is not related to "interoperable" Sam Johnston 2008-06-16 18:25
00367 Re: [oiic-formation-discuss] Which is definitive odf? Dave Pawson 2008-06-16 18:27
00368 Re: [oiic-formation-discuss] "Strictly conforming" is not related to "interoperable" Dave Pawson 2008-06-16 18:34
00369 Proposal for Charter Requirements section, was Which is definitive odf? marbux 2008-06-16 18:35
00370 Re: [oiic-formation-discuss] Which is definitive odf? Sam Johnston 2008-06-16 18:40
00371 Re: [oiic-formation-discuss] "Strictly conforming" is not related to "interoperable" Dave Pawson 2008-06-16 18:59
00372 The conduct of this list Eduardo Gutentag 2008-06-16 19:08
00373 Re: [oiic-formation-discuss] Which is definitive odf? Shawn 2008-06-16 19:26
00374 Re: [oiic-formation-discuss] Which is definitive odf? Sam Johnston 2008-06-16 19:30
00375 Re: [oiic-formation-discuss] Which is definitive odf? Dave Pawson 2008-06-16 19:36
00376 Re: [oiic-formation-discuss] "Strictly conforming" is not related to "interoperable" Sam Johnston 2008-06-16 19:38
00377 Re: [oiic-formation-discuss] Which is definitive odf? Sam Johnston 2008-06-16 19:44
00378 ACID, roundtrip and Odf generation Henrik Sundberg 2008-06-16 20:15
00379 Re: [oiic-formation-discuss] ACID, roundtrip and Odf generation David Gerard 2008-06-16 20:30
00380 RE: [oiic-formation-discuss] Proposal for Charter Requirements section, was Which is definitive odf? Hurley, Garry \(L&I - OIT\) 2008-06-16 20:43
00381 Re: [oiic-formation-discuss] ACID, roundtrip and Odf generation Henrik Sundberg 2008-06-16 21:06
00382 Re: [oiic-formation-discuss] ACID, roundtrip and Odf generation David Gerard 2008-06-16 21:23
00383 CDRF-like wrapper to handle elements via profile whitelists jose lorenzo 2008-06-16 22:05
00384 Re: [oiic-formation-discuss] Which is definitive odf? Dave Pawson 2008-06-17 06:27
00385 Re: [oiic-formation-discuss] Which is definitive odf? Sam Johnston 2008-06-17 06:34
00386 Re: [oiic-formation-discuss] Which is definitive odf? Dave Pawson 2008-06-17 06:47
00387 Re: [oiic-formation-discuss] Which is definitive odf? marbux 2008-06-17 07:33
00388 Re: [oiic-formation-discuss] MARBUX POINT OF ORDER, OBJECTION, ANDSUGGESTIONS No. 1 Sander Marechal 2008-06-17 08:12
00389 Profiles Shawn 2008-06-17 08:54
00390 Re: [oiic-formation-discuss] Profiles Dave Pawson 2008-06-17 09:20
00391 Re: [oiic-formation-discuss] Which is definitive odf? marbux 2008-06-17 09:41
00392 Re: [oiic-formation-discuss] Which is definitive odf? marbux 2008-06-17 09:50
00393 Re: [oiic-formation-discuss] Which is definitive odf? marbux 2008-06-17 10:00
00394 Re: [oiic-formation-discuss] Which is definitive odf? Matthew Holloway 2008-06-17 10:27
00395 Re: [oiic-formation-discuss] Which is definitive odf? [email protected] 2008-06-17 11:07
00396 Re: [oiic-formation-discuss] Profiles Sander Marechal 2008-06-17 12:02
00397 Re: [oiic-formation-discuss] Which is definitive odf? jose lorenzo 2008-06-17 12:25
00398 Re: [oiic-formation-discuss] MARBUX POINT OF ORDER, OBJECTION, AND SUGGESTIONS No. 1 marbux 2008-06-17 13:05
00399 Re: [oiic-formation-discuss] MARBUX POINT OF ORDER, OBJECTION, AND SUGGESTIONS No. 1 Dave Pawson 2008-06-17 13:25
00400 Re: [oiic-formation-discuss] MARBUX POINT OF ORDER, OBJECTION, ANDSUGGESTIONS No. 1 Sander Marechal 2008-06-17 13:40
00401 FW: [oiic-formation-discuss] Level of detail needed in a TC Charter Mary McRae 2008-06-17 14:44
00402 Re: [oiic-formation-discuss] (1)(d) A list of deliverables,with projected completion dates. Michael Brauer - Sun Germany - ham02 - Hamburg 2008-06-17 14:45
00403 Re: [oiic-formation-discuss] (1)(d) A list of deliverables, with projected completion dates. Dave Pawson 2008-06-17 14:57
00404 RE: [oiic-formation-discuss] Which is definitive odf? [email protected] 2008-06-17 15:13
00405 Re: [oiic-formation-discuss] Which is definitive odf? Dave Pawson 2008-06-17 15:26
00406 Re: [oiic-formation-discuss] Which is definitive odf? [email protected] 2008-06-17 16:07
00407 Re: [oiic-formation-discuss] Which is definitive odf? [email protected] 2008-06-17 16:07
00408 Re: [oiic-formation-discuss] Profiles [email protected] 2008-06-17 16:07
00409 Re: [oiic-formation-discuss] Which is definitive odf? [email protected] 2008-06-17 16:07
00410 Re: [oiic-formation-discuss] Profiles Dave Pawson 2008-06-17 16:32
00411 Re: [oiic-formation-discuss] Profiles Shawn 2008-06-17 16:52
00412 Re: [oiic-formation-discuss] Profiles Dave Pawson 2008-06-17 17:10
00413 Re: [oiic-formation-discuss] Which is definitive odf? Sam Johnston 2008-06-17 17:28
00414 Profiles. Attempting a definition. Dave Pawson 2008-06-17 18:27
00415 Re: [oiic-formation-discuss] Profiles. Attempting a definition. Shawn 2008-06-17 18:54
00416 RE: [oiic-formation-discuss] Profiles. Attempting a definition. Hurley, Garry \(L&I - OIT\) 2008-06-17 20:54
00417 TC Charter Gordon MacGinitie 2008-06-17 21:30
00418 Re: [oiic-formation-discuss] Profiles. Attempting a definition. Dave Pawson 2008-06-18 06:59
00419 Re: [oiic-formation-discuss] Profiles. Attempting a definition. Shawn 2008-06-18 08:00
00420 Re: [oiic-formation-discuss] Profiles. Attempting a definition. Dave Pawson 2008-06-18 09:20
00421 RE: [oiic-formation-discuss] Profiles. Attempting a definition. Hurley, Garry \(L&I - OIT\) 2008-06-18 12:56
00422 The importance to users of documents looking the same David Gerard 2008-06-18 14:29
00423 Re: [oiic-formation-discuss] The importance to users of documents looking the same Dave Pawson 2008-06-18 14:33
00424 RE: [oiic-formation-discuss] Profiles. Attempting a definition. jose lorenzo 2008-06-18 14:49
00425 Re: [oiic-formation-discuss] MARBUX POINT OF ORDER, OBJECTION, AND SUGGESTIONS No. 1 marbux 2008-06-18 16:09
00426 Re: [oiic-formation-discuss] Profiles. Attempting a definition. [email protected] 2008-06-18 16:16
00427 Re: [oiic-formation-discuss] The importance to users of documents lookingthe same [email protected] 2008-06-18 16:16
00428 Re: [oiic-formation-discuss] The importance to users of documents looking the same David Gerard 2008-06-18 16:20
00429 Re: [oiic-formation-discuss] The importance to users of documents looking the same Sam Johnston 2008-06-18 16:32
00430 Re: [oiic-formation-discuss] Profiles. Attempting a definition. Dave Pawson 2008-06-18 16:35
00431 Re: [oiic-formation-discuss] The importance to users of documents looking the same Dave Pawson 2008-06-18 16:36
00432 Re: [oiic-formation-discuss] The importance to users of documents looking the same Dave Pawson 2008-06-18 16:41
00433 Re: [oiic-formation-discuss] MARBUX POINT OF ORDER, OBJECTION, AND SUGGESTIONS No. 1 marbux 2008-06-18 18:17
00434 Implementation vs. result (CDRF, profiles, et al.) Simon Calderson 2008-06-18 18:37
00435 Re: [oiic-formation-discuss] Implementation vs. result (CDRF, profiles, et al.) Dave Pawson 2008-06-18 18:58
00436 PROPOSAL -- Name change for proposed TC marbux 2008-06-18 20:18
00437 Re: [oiic-formation-discuss] The importance to users of documents lookingthe same [email protected] 2008-06-18 21:16
00438 Re: [oiic-formation-discuss] The importance to users of documents lookingthe same [email protected] 2008-06-18 21:16
00439 Re: [oiic-formation-discuss] PROPOSAL -- Name change for proposed TC [email protected] 2008-06-18 21:16
00440 Re: [oiic-formation-discuss] The importance to users of documents looking the same marbux 2008-06-18 21:24
00441 Re: [oiic-formation-discuss] PROPOSAL -- Name change for proposedTC Craig A. Eddy 2008-06-18 21:27
00442 Re: [oiic-formation-discuss] MARBUX POINT OF ORDER, OBJECTION, AND SUGGESTIONS No. 1 jose lorenzo 2008-06-18 21:40
00443 RE: [oiic-formation-discuss] The importance to users of documents looking the same Hurley, Garry \(L&I - OIT\) 2008-06-18 22:04
00444 Moving forward [email protected] 2008-06-18 22:04
00445 Question 2(a) Identification of Similar work robert_weirAus.ibm.com 2008-06-18 22:05
00446 Question (2)(f) Member Section [email protected] 2008-06-18 22:08
00447 Re: [oiic-formation-discuss] PROPOSAL -- Name change for proposed TC marbux 2008-06-18 22:20
00448 Re: [oiic-formation-discuss] PROPOSAL -- Name change for proposed TC jose lorenzo 2008-06-18 22:35
00449 Re: [oiic-formation-discuss] The importance to users of documents looking the same jose lorenzo 2008-06-18 22:52
00450 Re: [oiic-formation-discuss] PROPOSAL -- Name change for proposed TC Sunny Dubey 2008-06-18 23:31
00451 Re: [oiic-formation-discuss] Implementation vs. result (CDRF, profiles, et al.) jose lorenzo 2008-06-18 23:37
00452 Re: [oiic-formation-discuss] Implementation vs. result (CDRF, profiles,et al.) Shawn 2008-06-19 00:15
00453 Re: [oiic-formation-discuss] Question (2)(f) Member Section Sam Johnston 2008-06-19 00:27
00454 Re: [oiic-formation-discuss] Implementation vs. result (CDRF, profiles,et al.) Craig A. Eddy 2008-06-19 00:30
00455 Re: [oiic-formation-discuss] The importance to users of documents looking the same jose lorenzo 2008-06-19 00:47
00456 Re: [oiic-formation-discuss] The importance to users of documents looking the same jose lorenzo 2008-06-19 01:12
00457 Re: [oiic-formation-discuss] (1)(d) A list of deliverables, with projected completion dates. jose lorenzo 2008-06-19 01:43
00458 RE: [oiic-formation-discuss] The importance to users of documents lookingthe same [email protected] 2008-06-19 05:20
00459 Re: [oiic-formation-discuss] PROPOSAL -- Name change for proposed TC marbux 2008-06-19 06:58
00460 Re: [oiic-formation-discuss] Implementation vs. result (CDRF, profiles, et al.) Dave Pawson 2008-06-19 07:13
00461 Re: [oiic-formation-discuss] Implementation vs. result (CDRF, profiles, et al.) Dave Pawson 2008-06-19 07:20
00462 Re: [oiic-formation-discuss] PROPOSAL -- Name change for proposed TC marbux 2008-06-19 08:01
00463 Re: [oiic-formation-discuss] PROPOSAL -- Name change for proposed TC Dave Pawson 2008-06-19 08:31
00464 Re: [oiic-formation-discuss] The importance to users of documents looking the same Peter Dolding 2008-06-19 08:48
00465 Re: [oiic-formation-discuss] PROPOSAL -- Name change for proposed TC Simon Calderson 2008-06-19 08:59
00466 irc Dave Pawson 2008-06-19 09:03
00467 Re: [oiic-formation-discuss] The importance to users of documents looking the same Simon Calderson 2008-06-19 09:09
00468 Re: [oiic-formation-discuss] The importance to users of documents looking the same Dave Pawson 2008-06-19 09:16
00469 Re: [oiic-formation-discuss] PROPOSAL -- Name change for proposed TC Matthew Reingold 2008-06-19 09:21
00470 Re: [oiic-formation-discuss] MARBUX POINT OF ORDER, OBJECTION, ANDSUGGESTIONS No. 1 Sander Marechal 2008-06-19 09:23
00471 Re: [oiic-formation-discuss] PROPOSAL -- Name change for proposed TC marbux 2008-06-19 09:31
00472 Re: [oiic-formation-discuss] The importance to users of documents looking the same Simon Calderson 2008-06-19 09:33
00473 Re: [oiic-formation-discuss] MARBUX POINT OF ORDER, OBJECTION, ANDSUGGESTIONS No. 1 Sander Marechal 2008-06-19 09:37
00474 Re: [oiic-formation-discuss] The importance to users of documents looking the same Dave Pawson 2008-06-19 09:51
00475 Re: [oiic-formation-discuss] PROPOSAL -- Name change for proposed TC David Gerard 2008-06-19 10:03
00476 Re: [oiic-formation-discuss] Profiles. Attempting a definition. Sander Marechal 2008-06-19 10:07
00477 Re: [oiic-formation-discuss] The importance to users of documentslooking the same Sander Marechal 2008-06-19 10:18
00478 Re: [oiic-formation-discuss] PROPOSAL -- Name change for proposedTC Matthew Holloway 2008-06-19 10:31
00479 Re: [oiic-formation-discuss] The importance to users of documents looking the same Peter Dolding 2008-06-19 10:56
00480 Re: [oiic-formation-discuss] The importance to users of documents looking the same Simon Calderson 2008-06-19 11:18
00481 Re: [oiic-formation-discuss] PROPOSAL -- Name change for proposed TC marbux 2008-06-19 11:38
00482 Re: [oiic-formation-discuss] PROPOSAL -- Name change for proposed TC Dave Pawson 2008-06-19 12:44
00483 Re: [oiic-formation-discuss] The importance to users of documentslooking the same Sander Marechal 2008-06-19 12:57
00484 Re: [oiic-formation-discuss] PROPOSAL -- Name change for proposedTC Sander Marechal 2008-06-19 13:03
00485 Re: [oiic-formation-discuss] PROPOSAL -- Name change for proposed TC Simon Calderson 2008-06-19 13:25
00486 Re: [oiic-formation-discuss] PROPOSAL -- Name change for proposed TC marbux 2008-06-19 14:11
00487 Re: [oiic-formation-discuss] PROPOSAL -- Name change for proposedTC Craig A. Eddy 2008-06-19 15:21
00488 Re: [oiic-formation-discuss] Which is definitive odf? [email protected] 2008-06-19 15:49
00489 Re: [oiic-formation-discuss] The importance to users of documents looking the same [email protected] 2008-06-19 15:49
00490 Joining the new TC -- Who is in, who is out? [email protected] 2008-06-19 15:49
00491 Re: [oiic-formation-discuss] PROPOSAL -- Name change for proposedTC Sander Marechal 2008-06-19 15:55
00492 Re: [oiic-formation-discuss] Which is definitive odf? Dave Pawson 2008-06-19 15:59
00493 Re: [oiic-formation-discuss] Joining the new TC -- Who is in, who is out? Dave Pawson 2008-06-19 16:04
00494 Re: [oiic-formation-discuss] PROPOSAL -- Name change for proposed TC [email protected] 2008-06-19 16:09
00495 Re: [oiic-formation-discuss] PROPOSAL -- Name change for proposed TC Jon Tullett 2008-06-19 16:10
00496 Re: [oiic-formation-discuss] Joining the new TC -- Who is in, who is out? Sam Johnston 2008-06-19 16:21
00497 Re: [oiic-formation-discuss] Joining the new TC -- Who is in, who is out? [email protected] 2008-06-19 16:27
00498 Re: [oiic-formation-discuss] Which is definitive odf? [email protected] 2008-06-19 16:27
00499 Re: [oiic-formation-discuss] Joining the new TC -- Who is in, who is out? Dave Pawson 2008-06-19 16:46
00500 Re: [oiic-formation-discuss] Which is definitive odf? Dave Pawson 2008-06-19 16:53
00501 RE: [oiic-formation-discuss] PROPOSAL -- Name change for proposed TC Hurley, Garry \(L&I - OIT\) 2008-06-19 17:39
00502 Re: [oiic-formation-discuss] PROPOSAL -- Name change for proposed TC marbux 2008-06-19 17:46
00503 Re: [oiic-formation-discuss] Which is definitive odf? Dave Pawson 2008-06-19 17:51
00504 Re: [oiic-formation-discuss] The importance to users of documentslooking the same Radoslav Dejanović 2008-06-19 18:35
00505 Re: [oiic-formation-discuss] MARBUX POINT OF ORDER, OBJECTION, ANDSUGGESTIONS No. 1 Radoslav Dejanović 2008-06-19 19:08
00506 RE: [oiic-formation-discuss] The importance to users of documents looking the same Hurley, Garry \(L&I - OIT\) 2008-06-19 19:19
00507 Re: [oiic-formation-discuss] Which is definitive odf? [email protected] 2008-06-19 19:54
00508 RE: [oiic-formation-discuss] Which is definitive odf? Mary McRae 2008-06-19 20:00
00509 Re: [oiic-formation-discuss] Which is definitive odf? [email protected] 2008-06-19 20:26
00510 Summary and Focus? Shawn 2008-06-19 20:29
00511 Re: [oiic-formation-discuss] Summary and Focus? David Gerard 2008-06-19 20:39
00512 Re: [oiic-formation-discuss] Summary and Focus? [email protected] 2008-06-19 21:10
00513 Re: [oiic-formation-discuss] Summary and Focus? jose lorenzo 2008-06-19 21:36
00514 Re: [oiic-formation-discuss] Summary and Focus? jose lorenzo 2008-06-19 21:45
00515 Re: [oiic-formation-discuss] Summary and Focus? Radoslav Dejanović 2008-06-19 22:14
00516 Re: [oiic-formation-discuss] The importance to users of documentslooking the same Sander Marechal 2008-06-19 23:06
00517 Re: [oiic-formation-discuss] The importance to users of documents looking the same David Gerard 2008-06-19 23:15
00518 Re: [oiic-formation-discuss] The importance to users of documentslooking the same Sander Marechal 2008-06-19 23:21
00519 Re: [oiic-formation-discuss] Which is definitive odf? Dave Pawson 2008-06-20 05:25
00520 Re: [oiic-formation-discuss] Summary and Focus? Dave Pawson 2008-06-20 05:40
00521 Re: [oiic-formation-discuss] PROPOSAL -- Name change for proposed TC marbux 2008-06-20 05:47
00522 Re: [oiic-formation-discuss] Summary and Focus? Dave Pawson 2008-06-20 06:03
00523 Re: [oiic-formation-discuss] The importance to users of documents looking the same Dave Pawson 2008-06-20 06:14
00524 Re: [oiic-formation-discuss] Summary and Focus? Dave Pawson 2008-06-20 06:20
00525 Re: [oiic-formation-discuss] The importance to users of documents looking the same David Gerard 2008-06-20 07:15
00526 Re: [oiic-formation-discuss] Summary and Focus? Sander Marechal 2008-06-20 09:19
00527 Re: [oiic-formation-discuss] The importance to users of documents looking the same Dave Pawson 2008-06-20 09:42
00528 Re: [oiic-formation-discuss] The importance to users of documents looking the same marbux 2008-06-20 09:45
00529 Re: [oiic-formation-discuss] Summary and Focus? Sander Marechal 2008-06-20 09:49
00530 Re: [oiic-formation-discuss] The importance to users of documentslooking the same Sander Marechal 2008-06-20 09:54
00531 Re: [oiic-formation-discuss] Summary and Focus? Simon Calderson 2008-06-20 09:58
00532 Re: [oiic-formation-discuss] The importance to users of documents looking the same Dave Pawson 2008-06-20 10:10
00533 Deliverables. Summary. Dave Pawson 2008-06-20 10:18
00534 Re: [oiic-formation-discuss] The importance to users of documents looking the same marbux 2008-06-20 10:43
00535 Re: [oiic-formation-discuss] The importance to users of documents looking the same marbux 2008-06-20 11:05
00536 Re: [oiic-formation-discuss] The importance to users of documents looking the same marbux 2008-06-20 11:42
00537 Deliverable: odf-diff? Sander Marechal 2008-06-20 11:56
00538 Re: [oiic-formation-discuss] The importance to users of documents looking the same Simon Calderson 2008-06-20 12:04
00539 Re: [oiic-formation-discuss] Deliverable: odf-diff? Dave Pawson 2008-06-20 12:14
00540 Re: [oiic-formation-discuss] The importance to users of documents looking the same marbux 2008-06-20 12:16
00541 Re: [oiic-formation-discuss] The importance to users of documents looking the same marbux 2008-06-20 12:45
00542 ODF compatibility, alt. CDRF standards (was: The importance to users of documents looking the same) Simon Calderson 2008-06-20 12:54
00543 Re: [oiic-formation-discuss] The importance to users of documents lookingthe same [email protected] 2008-06-20 13:01
00544 RE: [oiic-formation-discuss] The importance to users of documents looking the same Hurley, Garry \(L&I - OIT\) 2008-06-20 13:21
00545 Re: [oiic-formation-discuss] The importance to users of documentslooking the same Craig A. Eddy 2008-06-20 13:28
00546 Re: [oiic-formation-discuss] The importance to users of documents looking the same marbux 2008-06-20 13:55
00547 Re: [oiic-formation-discuss] Deliverable: odf-diff? Sander Marechal 2008-06-20 14:07
00548 Re: [oiic-formation-discuss] Deliverable: odf-diff? Dave Pawson 2008-06-20 14:30
00549 RE: [oiic-formation-discuss] Summary and Focus? Hurley, Garry \(L&I - OIT\) 2008-06-20 14:30
00550 Re: [oiic-formation-discuss] The importance to users of documentslooking the same Sander Marechal 2008-06-20 14:31
00551 Re: [oiic-formation-discuss] Summary and Focus? Dave Pawson 2008-06-20 14:48
00552 Re: [oiic-formation-discuss] The importance to users of documents looking the same Dave Pawson 2008-06-20 14:54
00553 Re: [oiic-formation-discuss] Which is definitive odf? [email protected] 2008-06-20 14:54
00554 Re: [oiic-formation-discuss] Summary and Focus? [email protected] 2008-06-20 14:54
00555 Re: [oiic-formation-discuss] Which is definitive odf? Dave Pawson 2008-06-20 15:07
00556 Re: [oiic-formation-discuss] Deliverable: odf-diff? Sander Marechal 2008-06-20 15:24
00557 Re: [oiic-formation-discuss] The importance to users of documentslooking the same Sander Marechal 2008-06-20 16:01
00558 Re: [oiic-formation-discuss] The importance to users of documents looking the same Dave Pawson 2008-06-20 16:10
00559 Re: [oiic-formation-discuss] Summary and Focus? David Gerard 2008-06-20 18:03
00560 Re: [oiic-formation-discuss] The importance to users of documents looking the same marbux 2008-06-20 18:04
00561 RE: [oiic-formation-discuss] Summary and Focus? Hurley, Garry \(L&I - OIT\) 2008-06-20 18:40
00562 RE: [oiic-formation-discuss] The importance to users of documents looking the same Hurley, Garry \(L&I - OIT\) 2008-06-20 18:49
00563 Re: [oiic-formation-discuss] Summary and Focus? [email protected] 2008-06-20 18:59
00564 Re: [oiic-formation-discuss] The importance to users of documents lookingthe same [email protected] 2008-06-20 18:59
00565 Re: [oiic-formation-discuss] Summary and Focus? [email protected] 2008-06-20 18:59
00566 Re: [oiic-formation-discuss] Deliverable: odf-diff? [email protected] 2008-06-20 18:59
00567 RE: [oiic-formation-discuss] Deliverable: odf-diff? Hurley, Garry \(L&I - OIT\) 2008-06-20 19:11
00568 RE: [oiic-formation-discuss] Deliverable: odf-diff? Hurley, Garry \(L&I - OIT\) 2008-06-20 19:13
00569 Re: [oiic-formation-discuss] The importance to users of documents looking the same marbux 2008-06-20 19:19
00570 Re: [oiic-formation-discuss] PROPOSAL -- Name change for proposed TC marbux 2008-06-20 19:41
00571 Thread cutting... Hurley, Garry \(L&I - OIT\) 2008-06-20 19:51
00572 Re: [oiic-formation-discuss] Thread cutting... Craig A. Eddy 2008-06-20 20:02
00573 Re: [oiic-formation-discuss] Thread cutting... Craig A. Eddy 2008-06-20 20:13
00574 Profiles -- How much to detail in the charter? [email protected] 2008-06-20 20:20
00575 Re: [oiic-formation-discuss] The importance to users of documents lookingthe same [email protected] 2008-06-20 20:20
00576 Re: [oiic-formation-discuss] Summary and Focus? [email protected] 2008-06-20 20:20
00577 Re: [oiic-formation-discuss] PROPOSAL -- Name change for proposed TC [email protected] 2008-06-20 20:36
00578 Re: [oiic-formation-discuss] Thread cutting... [email protected] 2008-06-20 20:37
00579 Re: [oiic-formation-discuss] PROPOSAL -- Name change for proposedTC Roy Schestowitz 2008-06-20 20:37
00580 Re: [oiic-formation-discuss] Deliverable: odf-diff? Radoslav Dejanović 2008-06-20 20:54
00581 Re: [oiic-formation-discuss] Deliverable: odf-diff? marbux 2008-06-21 00:30
00582 Re: [oiic-formation-discuss] Summary and Focus? jose lorenzo 2008-06-21 02:08
00583 Re: [oiic-formation-discuss] Summary and Focus? jose lorenzo 2008-06-21 02:29
00584 IRC Channel created and registered Jonathan Marsden 2008-06-21 05:12
00585 Re: [oiic-formation-discuss] Deliverable: odf-diff? Dave Pawson 2008-06-21 07:22
00586 Re: [oiic-formation-discuss] Summary and Focus? Dave Pawson 2008-06-21 07:24
00587 Re: [oiic-formation-discuss] The importance to users of documents looking the same marbux 2008-06-21 09:06
00588 Bedtime reading. Dave Pawson 2008-06-21 09:06
00589 Re: [oiic-formation-discuss] IRC Channel created and registered Sam Johnston 2008-06-21 09:30
00590 Spreadsheets and the OpenFormula group Dave Pawson 2008-06-21 09:31
00591 Re: [oiic-formation-discuss] The importance to users of documents looking the same Peter Dolding 2008-06-21 11:00
00592 Re: [oiic-formation-discuss] Deliverable: odf-diff? Sander Marechal 2008-06-21 11:01
00593 Re: [oiic-formation-discuss] Deliverable: odf-diff? Sander Marechal 2008-06-21 11:07
00594 Re: [oiic-formation-discuss] Deliverable: odf-diff? Sander Marechal 2008-06-21 11:11
00595 Re: [oiic-formation-discuss] Summary and Focus? Sander Marechal 2008-06-21 11:14
00596 Re: [oiic-formation-discuss] Deliverable: odf-diff? Dave Pawson 2008-06-21 11:27
00597 Re: [oiic-formation-discuss] Profiles -- How much to detail in thecharter? Sander Marechal 2008-06-21 11:31
00598 Re: [oiic-formation-discuss] The importance to users of documents looking the same Sunny Dubey 2008-06-21 11:36
00599 Re: [oiic-formation-discuss] Thread cutting... Sander Marechal 2008-06-21 11:36
00600 Re: [oiic-formation-discuss] Deliverable: odf-diff? Dave Pawson 2008-06-21 11:45
00601 Re: [oiic-formation-discuss] The importance to users of documents looking the same marbux 2008-06-21 12:53
00602 Re: [oiic-formation-discuss] Thread cutting... Matthew Reingold 2008-06-21 13:27
00603 Re: [oiic-formation-discuss] Spreadsheets and the OpenFormula group Mary McRae 2008-06-21 17:24
00604 The 80K pound gorilla .. let's keep the baby jose lorenzo 2008-06-21 18:14
00605 Re: [oiic-formation-discuss] Thread cutting... jose lorenzo 2008-06-21 18:20
00606 Re: [oiic-formation-discuss] Summary and Focus? jose lorenzo 2008-06-21 19:18
00607 Re: [oiic-formation-discuss] Thread cutting... Shawn 2008-06-21 19:32
00608 Re: [oiic-formation-discuss] Deliverable: odf-diff? Sander Marechal 2008-06-21 20:25
00609 Profiles: suggested use-cases Sander Marechal 2008-06-21 21:29
00610 IRC Channel created and registered Craig A. Eddy 2008-06-21 21:40
00611 Re: [oiic-formation-discuss] Thread cutting... Gordon MacGinitie 2008-06-21 21:44
00612 Re: [oiic-formation-discuss] Deliverable: odf-diff? Dave Pawson 2008-06-22 06:56
00613 Re: [oiic-formation-discuss] Profiles: suggested use-cases Dave Pawson 2008-06-22 07:08
00614 Open formula group, and getting ahead of ourselves? Dave Pawson 2008-06-22 08:31
00615 Re: [oiic-formation-discuss] Deliverable: odf-diff? Sander Marechal 2008-06-22 09:52
00616 Re: [oiic-formation-discuss] IRC Channel created and registered Sander Marechal 2008-06-22 09:59
00617 Re: [oiic-formation-discuss] Deliverable: odf-diff? Dave Pawson 2008-06-22 10:14
00618 Re: [oiic-formation-discuss] Profiles: suggested use-cases Sander Marechal 2008-06-22 10:17
00619 Re: [oiic-formation-discuss] Profiles: suggested use-cases Dave Pawson 2008-06-22 11:12
00620 Feedback to the ODF TC Dave Pawson 2008-06-22 11:57
00621 Re: [oiic-formation-discuss] Profiles: suggested use-cases marbux 2008-06-22 14:02
00622 Re: [oiic-formation-discuss] Profiles: suggested use-cases marbux 2008-06-22 14:09
00623 Re: [oiic-formation-discuss] Profiles: suggested use-cases Dave Pawson 2008-06-22 14:14
00624 Re: [oiic-formation-discuss] Deliverable: odf-diff? marbux 2008-06-22 14:55
00625 Re: [oiic-formation-discuss] Deliverable: odf-diff? Dave Pawson 2008-06-22 15:09
00626 Re: [oiic-formation-discuss] IRC Channel created and registered marbux 2008-06-22 15:24
00627 Re: [oiic-formation-discuss] IRC Channel created and registered Dave Pawson 2008-06-22 15:36
00628 Re: [oiic-formation-discuss] Deliverable: odf-diff? marbux 2008-06-22 17:02
00629 Re: [oiic-formation-discuss] Deliverable: odf-diff? Dave Pawson 2008-06-22 17:13
00630 Re: [oiic-formation-discuss] Profiles: suggested use-cases marbux 2008-06-22 18:53
00631 Re: [oiic-formation-discuss] Feedback to the ODF TC jose lorenzo 2008-06-22 20:57
00632 Re: [oiic-formation-discuss] Deliverable: odf-diff? Sander Marechal 2008-06-22 21:10
00633 Re: [oiic-formation-discuss] Profiles: suggested use-cases Sander Marechal 2008-06-22 21:21
00634 Re: [oiic-formation-discuss] Profiles: suggested use-cases Sander Marechal 2008-06-22 21:24
00635 Re: [oiic-formation-discuss] Profiles: suggested use-cases David Gerard 2008-06-22 22:10
00636 Re: [oiic-formation-discuss] Deliverable: odf-diff? Shawn 2008-06-23 02:24
00637 Re: [oiic-formation-discuss] IRC Channel created and registered Matthew Reingold 2008-06-23 05:22
00638 Re: [oiic-formation-discuss] Feedback to the ODF TC Dave Pawson 2008-06-23 07:12
00639 Re: [oiic-formation-discuss] #oiic IRC Channel now being logged andarchived Jonathan Marsden 2008-06-23 07:12
00640 Re: [oiic-formation-discuss] Deliverable: odf-diff? Dave Pawson 2008-06-23 07:29
00641 Text archive creator script available Jonathan Marsden 2008-06-23 07:31
00642 Re: [oiic-formation-discuss] #oiic IRC Channel now being logged andarchived Roy Schestowitz 2008-06-23 08:16
00643 Re: [oiic-formation-discuss] IRC Channel created and registered Roy Schestowitz 2008-06-23 08:18
00644 Re: [oiic-formation-discuss] IRC Channel created and registered Radoslav Dejanović 2008-06-23 09:34
00645 Re: [oiic-formation-discuss] Deliverable: odf-diff? Radoslav Dejanović 2008-06-23 09:41
00646 Re: [oiic-formation-discuss] Deliverable: odf-diff? Dave Pawson 2008-06-23 10:10
00647 Informative clauses Dave Pawson 2008-06-23 10:18
00648 Test priority Dave Pawson 2008-06-23 10:27
00649 Re: [oiic-formation-discuss] Informative clauses Radoslav Dejanović 2008-06-23 11:13
00650 Re: [oiic-formation-discuss] Joining the new TC -- Who is in,who is out? Michael Brauer - Sun Germany - ham02 - Hamburg 2008-06-23 11:35
00651 Re: [oiic-formation-discuss] Informative clauses Dave Pawson 2008-06-23 11:37
00652 Re: [oiic-formation-discuss] Informative clauses Radoslav Dejanović 2008-06-23 12:05
00653 Use Cases [email protected] 2008-06-23 12:23
00654 Re: [oiic-formation-discuss] Spreadsheets and the OpenFormula group [email protected] 2008-06-23 12:23
00655 OASIS Test Assertions Guidelines (TAG) TC [email protected] 2008-06-23 12:23
00656 Standards and Antitrust [email protected] 2008-06-23 12:23
00657 Re: [oiic-formation-discuss] Informative clauses Dave Pawson 2008-06-23 12:28
00658 Re: [oiic-formation-discuss] Deliverable: odf-diff? Dave Pawson 2008-06-23 12:30
00659 Re: [oiic-formation-discuss] Use Cases Dave Pawson 2008-06-23 12:33
00660 Re: [oiic-formation-discuss] Standards and Antitrust [email protected] 2008-06-23 12:58
00661 Re: [oiic-formation-discuss] Open formula group, and getting ahead ofourselves? [email protected] 2008-06-23 14:00
00662 Re: [oiic-formation-discuss] Profiles: suggested use-cases [email protected] 2008-06-23 14:00
00663 Re: [oiic-formation-discuss] Deliverable: odf-diff? [email protected] 2008-06-23 14:00
00664 Re: [oiic-formation-discuss] Deliverable: odf-diff? [email protected] 2008-06-23 14:00
00665 Re: [oiic-formation-discuss] Feedback to the ODF TC [email protected] 2008-06-23 14:00
00666 OASIS Guidelines to Writing Conformance Clauses [email protected] 2008-06-23 14:00
00667 Re: [oiic-formation-discuss] Deliverable: odf-diff? Dave Pawson 2008-06-23 14:14
00668 Re: [oiic-formation-discuss] Feedback to the ODF TC Dave Pawson 2008-06-23 14:17
00669 Re: [oiic-formation-discuss] OASIS Guidelines to Writing Conformance Clauses Dave Pawson 2008-06-23 14:22
00670 Re: [oiic-formation-discuss] Standards and Antitrust jose lorenzo 2008-06-23 15:14
00671 Re: [oiic-formation-discuss] Informative clauses [email protected] 2008-06-23 15:48
00672 Re: [oiic-formation-discuss] Deliverable: odf-diff? robert_weirAus.ibm.com 2008-06-23 15:48
00673 Re: [oiic-formation-discuss] Informative clauses Dave Pawson 2008-06-23 15:59
00674 Re: [oiic-formation-discuss] Deliverable: odf-diff? Dave Pawson 2008-06-23 16:04
00675 Re: [oiic-formation-discuss] Feedback to the ODF TC [email protected] 2008-06-23 17:21
00676 Re: [oiic-formation-discuss] OASIS Guidelines to Writing ConformanceClauses [email protected] 2008-06-23 17:21
00677 Re: [oiic-formation-discuss] Test priority [email protected] 2008-06-23 17:21
00678 Re: [oiic-formation-discuss] Informative clauses robert_weirAus.ibm.com 2008-06-23 17:21
00679 Re: [oiic-formation-discuss] Deliverable: odf-diff? [email protected] 2008-06-23 17:21
00680 Re: [oiic-formation-discuss] Feedback to the ODF TC Dave Pawson 2008-06-23 17:25
00681 Re: [oiic-formation-discuss] Informative clauses [email protected] 2008-06-23 17:47
00682 Re: [oiic-formation-discuss] Deliverable: odf-diff? [email protected] 2008-06-23 17:47
00683 Re: [oiic-formation-discuss] Test priority Dave Pawson 2008-06-23 17:59
00684 Re: [oiic-formation-discuss] Feedback to the ODF TC [email protected] 2008-06-23 18:03
00685 Re: [oiic-formation-discuss] Informative clauses Dave Pawson 2008-06-23 18:07
00686 Re: [oiic-formation-discuss] Feedback to the ODF TC jose lorenzo 2008-06-23 18:23
00687 Re: [oiic-formation-discuss] Informative clauses [email protected] 2008-06-23 18:27
00688 Re: [oiic-formation-discuss] Feedback to the ODF TC [email protected] 2008-06-23 18:36
00689 Re: [oiic-formation-discuss] OASIS Guidelines to Writing Conformance Clauses jose lorenzo 2008-06-23 18:39
00690 Re: [oiic-formation-discuss] OASIS Guidelines to Writing Conformance Clauses jose lorenzo 2008-06-23 19:42
00691 Re: [oiic-formation-discuss] Deliverable: odf-diff? Radoslav Dejanović 2008-06-23 20:38
00692 Re: [oiic-formation-discuss] OASIS Guidelines to Writing ConformanceClauses [email protected] 2008-06-23 21:08
00693 Re: [oiic-formation-discuss] Deliverable: odf-diff? Sander Marechal 2008-06-23 21:16
00694 Re: [oiic-formation-discuss] Use Cases Sander Marechal 2008-06-23 21:32
00695 Re: [oiic-formation-discuss] #oiic IRC Channel now being logged and archived Sander Marechal 2008-06-23 21:34
00696 Re: [oiic-formation-discuss] Feedback to the ODF TC Sander Marechal 2008-06-23 21:51
00697 Re: [oiic-formation-discuss] Informative clauses Sander Marechal 2008-06-23 22:01
00698 Re: [oiic-formation-discuss] Informative clauses [email protected] 2008-06-23 23:13
00699 Re: [oiic-formation-discuss] Deliverable: odf-diff? [email protected] 2008-06-23 23:55
00700 Re: [oiic-formation-discuss] OASIS Test Assertions Guidelines (TAG) TC Michael Shaw 2008-06-24 00:08
00701 Re: [oiic-formation-discuss] Deliverable: odf-diff? jose lorenzo 2008-06-24 01:00
00702 Re: [oiic-formation-discuss] Deliverable: odf-diff? jose lorenzo 2008-06-24 01:22
00703 Features, abstract features, and precise element semantics to limit lock-in jose lorenzo 2008-06-24 03:43
00704 Re: [oiic-formation-discuss] Features, abstract features, and precise element semantics to limit lock-in jose lorenzo 2008-06-24 04:12
00705 Summary of some "profiles" usage and ideas jose lorenzo 2008-06-24 05:00
00706 Re: [oiic-formation-discuss] Summary of some "profiles" usage and ideas jose lorenzo 2008-06-24 05:38
00707 Re: [oiic-formation-discuss] Informative clauses Michael Brauer - Sun Germany - ham02 - Hamburg 2008-06-24 06:37
00708 Re: [oiic-formation-discuss] Use Cases Michael Brauer - Sun Germany - ham02 - Hamburg 2008-06-24 06:45
00709 Re: [oiic-formation-discuss] Deliverable: odf-diff? Dave Pawson 2008-06-24 07:08
00710 Re: [oiic-formation-discuss] Features, abstract features, and precise element semantics to limit lock-in Dave Pawson 2008-06-24 07:39
00711 Re: [oiic-formation-discuss] Informative clauses Dave Pawson 2008-06-24 08:11
00712 Re: [oiic-formation-discuss] Use Cases Dave Pawson 2008-06-24 08:17
00713 Re: [oiic-formation-discuss] Informative clauses [email protected] 2008-06-24 11:59
00714 Canonicalizations galore jose lorenzo 2008-06-24 16:32
00715 Re: [oiic-formation-discuss] Canonicalizations galore Dave Pawson 2008-06-24 17:36
00716 Re: [oiic-formation-discuss] Canonicalizations galore [email protected] 2008-06-24 17:41
00717 Re: [oiic-formation-discuss] Canonicalizations galore jose lorenzo 2008-06-24 18:41
00718 Re: [oiic-formation-discuss] Canonicalizations galore jose lorenzo 2008-06-24 18:57
00719 Re: [oiic-formation-discuss] Canonicalizations galore jose lorenzo 2008-06-24 19:14
00720 List of ODF interop issues that need to be addressed -- Electronic signatures marbux 2008-06-25 00:39
00721 Re: List of ODF interop issues that need to be addressed -- Electronic signatures marbux 2008-06-25 00:55
00722 Re: [oiic-formation-discuss] List of ODF interop issues that need to be addressed -- Electronic signatures Sam Johnston 2008-06-25 10:06
00723 Re: [oiic-formation-discuss] List of ODF interop issues that need to beaddressed -- Electronic signatures [email protected] 2008-06-25 12:48
00724 Re: [oiic-formation-discuss] List of ODF interop issues that needto be addressed -- Electronic signatures Radoslav Dejanović 2008-06-25 13:53
00725 Canonical mappings.. let's start! jose lorenzo 2008-06-25 17:48
00726 Proposed Use case -- Interoperability in vertical and horizontal ODF markets marbux 2008-06-26 10:55
00727 RE: [oiic-formation-discuss] Deliverable: odf-diff? Hurley, Garry \(L&I - OIT\) 2008-06-26 12:31
00728 Re: [oiic-formation-discuss] Proposed Use case -- Interoperability in vertical and horizontal ODF markets Peter Dolding 2008-06-26 12:42
00729 RE: [oiic-formation-discuss] IRC Channel created and registered Hurley, Garry \(L&I - OIT\) 2008-06-26 12:49
00730 Re: [oiic-formation-discuss] Proposed Use case -- Interoperability invertical and horizontal ODF markets [email protected] 2008-06-26 13:29
00731 Re: [oiic-formation-discuss] Proposed Use case -- Interoperability in vertical and horizontal ODF markets Dave Pawson 2008-06-26 14:03
00732 Re: [oiic-formation-discuss] Proposed Use case -- Interoperability in vertical and horizontal ODF markets Simon Calderson 2008-06-26 14:55
00733 Re: [oiic-formation-discuss] Proposed Use case -- Interoperability in vertical and horizontal ODF markets Dave Pawson 2008-06-26 14:58
00734 Re: [oiic-formation-discuss] Proposed Use case -- Interoperability invertical and horizontal ODF markets [email protected] 2008-06-26 15:44
00735 Re: [oiic-formation-discuss] Proposed Use case -- Interoperability in vertical and horizontal ODF markets Peter Dolding 2008-06-26 23:22
00736 Re: [oiic-formation-discuss] Proposed Use case -- Interoperability in vertical and horizontal ODF markets marbux 2008-06-27 08:05
00737 Re: [oiic-formation-discuss] Proposed Use case -- Interoperability invertical and horizontal ODF markets [email protected] 2008-06-27 08:49
00738 Re: [oiic-formation-discuss] Proposed Use case -- Interoperability in vertical and horizontal ODF markets Peter Dolding 2008-06-27 10:34
00739 Re: [oiic-formation-discuss] Proposed Use case -- Interoperability invertical and horizontal ODF markets [email protected] 2008-06-27 12:09
00740 Re: [oiic-formation-discuss] Proposed Use case -- Interoperability in vertical and horizontal ODF markets Dave Pawson 2008-06-27 14:39
00741 Re: [oiic-formation-discuss] Proposed Use case -- Interoperability invertical and horizontal ODF markets [email protected] 2008-06-27 15:24
00742 Re: [oiic-formation-discuss] Proposed Use case -- Interoperability in vertical and horizontal ODF markets marbux 2008-06-27 16:15
00743 Re: [oiic-formation-discuss] Proposed Use case -- Interoperability invertical and horizontal ODF markets [email protected] 2008-06-27 17:09
00744 Re: [oiic-formation-discuss] Proposed Use case -- Interoperability in vertical and horizontal ODF markets marbux 2008-06-27 20:35
00745 Re: [oiic-formation-discuss] Proposed Use case -- Interoperability in vertical and horizontal ODF markets Simon Calderson 2008-06-27 21:42
00746 The basic skeleton of an architecture for profiles jose lorenzo 2008-06-28 00:19
00747 The basic skeleton of an architecture for profiles jose lorenzo 2008-06-28 00:19
00748 Purpose of List Mary McRae 2008-06-28 00:31
00749 Re: [oiic-formation-discuss] Purpose of List Craig A. Eddy 2008-06-28 00:49
00750 Re: [oiic-formation-discuss] Proposed Use case -- Interoperability in vertical and horizontal ODF markets Peter Dolding 2008-06-28 03:29
00751 Re: [oiic-formation-discuss] Proposed Use case -- Interoperability in vertical and horizontal ODF markets marbux 2008-06-28 09:48
00752 Re: [oiic-formation-discuss] Proposed Use case -- Interoperability in vertical and horizontal ODF markets Simon Calderson 2008-06-28 10:04
00753 Re: [oiic-formation-discuss] Proposed Use case -- Interoperability invertical and horizontal ODF markets [email protected] 2008-06-28 10:16
00754 Re: [oiic-formation-discuss] Proposed Use case -- Interoperability invertical and horizontal ODF markets [email protected] 2008-06-28 10:28
00755 Re: [oiic-formation-discuss] Proposed Use case -- Interoperability in vertical and horizontal ODF markets marbux 2008-06-28 10:54
00756 Re: [oiic-formation-discuss] Proposed Use case -- Interoperability in vertical and horizontal ODF markets Dave Pawson 2008-06-28 11:11
00757 Re: [oiic-formation-discuss] Proposed Use case -- Interoperability in vertical and horizontal ODF markets marbux 2008-06-28 11:42
00758 Re: [oiic-formation-discuss] Proposed Use case -- Interoperability in vertical and horizontal ODF markets Peter Dolding 2008-06-28 12:19
00759 Re: [oiic-formation-discuss] Proposed Use case -- Interoperability invertical and horizontal ODF markets [email protected] 2008-06-28 13:39
00760 Re: [oiic-formation-discuss] Proposed Use case -- Interoperability in vertical and horizontal ODF markets Simon Calderson 2008-06-28 13:45
00761 Implementation, Interoperability and Conformance Craig A. Eddy 2008-06-28 16:20
00762 Re: [oiic-formation-discuss] Implementation, Interoperability and Conformance Dave Pawson 2008-06-28 16:55
00763 Re: [oiic-formation-discuss] Implementation, Interoperability andConformance Craig A. Eddy 2008-06-28 17:20
00764 Re: [oiic-formation-discuss] Implementation, Interoperability and Conformance Dave Pawson 2008-06-28 17:27
00765 Re: [oiic-formation-discuss] Proposed Use case -- Interoperability in vertical and horizontal ODF markets marbux 2008-06-28 17:53
00766 Re: [oiic-formation-discuss] Proposed Use case -- Interoperability in vertical and horizontal ODF markets marbux 2008-06-28 18:08
00767 Re: [oiic-formation-discuss] Proposed Use case -- Interoperability in vertical and horizontal ODF markets Thomas Zander 2008-06-28 18:23
00768 Re: [oiic-formation-discuss] Proposed Use case -- Interoperability invertical and horizontal ODF markets [email protected] 2008-06-28 19:45
00769 Re: [oiic-formation-discuss] Proposed Use case -- Interoperability in vertical and horizontal ODF markets marbux 2008-06-28 19:59
00770 Re: [oiic-formation-discuss] Proposed Use case -- Interoperability in vertical and horizontal ODF markets Dave Pawson 2008-06-28 20:40
00771 Re: [oiic-formation-discuss] Proposed Use case -- Interoperability in vertical and horizontal ODF markets marbux 2008-06-28 20:42
00772 Re: [oiic-formation-discuss] Proposed Use case -- Interoperability in vertical and horizontal ODF markets Simon Calderson 2008-06-28 21:04
00773 Can we turn on list moderation now? [email protected] 2008-06-28 21:37
00774 Re: [oiic-formation-discuss] Can we turn on list moderation now? Craig A. Eddy 2008-06-28 21:41
00775 Hijacked? Shawn 2008-06-28 21:46
00776 Re: [oiic-formation-discuss] Hijacked? Craig A. Eddy 2008-06-28 21:52
00777 Re: [oiic-formation-discuss] Can we turn on list moderation now? Ben Baston 2008-06-28 21:54
00778 Re: [oiic-formation-discuss] Can we turn on list moderation now? David Gerard 2008-06-28 23:38
00779 Re: [oiic-formation-discuss] Can we turn on list moderation now? Michael Shaw 2008-06-28 23:50
00780 Re: [oiic-formation-discuss] Can we turn on list moderation now? Sunny Dubey 2008-06-28 23:54
00781 Re: [oiic-formation-discuss] Can we turn on list moderation now? Sam Johnston 2008-06-29 00:00
00782 Re: [oiic-formation-discuss] Can we turn on list moderation now? Alan Lord 2008-06-29 00:11
00783 Re: [oiic-formation-discuss] Can we turn on list moderation now? Matthew Holloway 2008-06-29 01:00
00784 Re: [oiic-formation-discuss] Can we turn on list moderation now? Matthew Reingold 2008-06-29 01:57
00785 Re: [oiic-formation-discuss] Can we turn on list moderation now? Shawn 2008-06-29 03:44
00786 Re: [oiic-formation-discuss] Proposed Use case -- Interoperability invertical and horizontal ODF markets [email protected] 2008-06-29 06:05
00787 Re: [oiic-formation-discuss] Can we turn on list moderation now? [email protected] 2008-06-29 06:27
00788 Re: [oiic-formation-discuss] Can we turn on list moderation now? Shawn 2008-06-29 07:55
00789 Re: [oiic-formation-discuss] Proposed Use case -- Interoperability in vertical and horizontal ODF markets Peter Dolding 2008-06-29 08:15
00790 Re: [oiic-formation-discuss] Can we turn on list moderation now? Alexander Wright 2008-06-29 09:12
00791 Re: [oiic-formation-discuss] Can we turn on list moderation now? Radoslav Dejanović 2008-06-29 10:53
00792 Re: [oiic-formation-discuss] Can we turn on list moderation now? dario balozzi 2008-06-29 14:34
00793 Re: [oiic-formation-discuss] Can we turn on list moderation now? jose lorenzo 2008-06-29 19:04
00794 My perspective Thomas Zander 2008-06-29 21:34
00795 Re: [oiic-formation-discuss] My perspective Gordon MacGinitie 2008-06-29 22:26
00796 Re: [oiic-formation-discuss] Profiles: suggested use-cases marbux 2008-06-30 00:08
00797 Re: [oiic-formation-discuss] Profiles: suggested use-cases Peter Dolding 2008-06-30 01:28
00798 Re: [oiic-formation-discuss] Profiles: suggested use-cases marbux 2008-06-30 02:15
00799 Re: [oiic-formation-discuss] Proposed Use case -- Interoperability in vertical and horizontal ODF markets marbux 2008-06-30 02:41
00800 Re: [oiic-formation-discuss] Profiles: suggested use-cases [email protected] 2008-06-30 06:44
00801 Re: [oiic-formation-discuss] Proposed Use case -- Interoperability invertical and horizontal ODF markets [email protected] 2008-06-30 06:51
00802 Re: [oiic-formation-discuss] Can we turn on list moderation now? Pamela Jones 2008-06-30 06:52
00803 Re: [oiic-formation-discuss] My perspective. display perferct? Dave Pawson 2008-06-30 07:14
00804 Re: [oiic-formation-discuss] My perspective. Extensions Dave Pawson 2008-06-30 07:20
00805 Re: [oiic-formation-discuss] My perspective. Extensions Peter Dolding 2008-06-30 08:03
00806 Re: [oiic-formation-discuss] My perspective. Extensions Dave Pawson 2008-06-30 08:15
00807 Re: [oiic-formation-discuss] My perspective. Extensions Shomas Yander 2008-06-30 08:15
00808 Re: [oiic-formation-discuss] My perspective. Extensions Shomas Yander 2008-06-30 08:23
00809 Re: [oiic-formation-discuss] My perspective. display perferct? Shomas Yander 2008-06-30 08:48
00810 Re: [oiic-formation-discuss] My perspective. display perferct? Dave Pawson 2008-06-30 09:26
00811 Re: [oiic-formation-discuss] My perspective. display perferct? Thomas Zander 2008-06-30 10:20
00812 Re: [oiic-formation-discuss] My perspective. display perferct? Dave Pawson 2008-06-30 10:44
00813 Re: [oiic-formation-discuss] My perspective. display perferct? Alexander Wright 2008-06-30 10:59
00814 Re: [oiic-formation-discuss] My perspective. display perferct? Dave Pawson 2008-06-30 11:02
00815 Re: [oiic-formation-discuss] My perspective. display perferct? Peter Dolding 2008-06-30 11:04
00816 Re: [oiic-formation-discuss] My perspective. Extensions Peter Dolding 2008-06-30 11:26
00817 Re: [oiic-formation-discuss] My perspective. display perferct? Shomas Yander 2008-06-30 11:27
00818 Re: [oiic-formation-discuss] My perspective. display perferct? Thomas Zander 2008-06-30 11:27
00819 Re: [oiic-formation-discuss] My perspective. display perferct? Peter Dolding 2008-06-30 11:43
00820 Re: [oiic-formation-discuss] My perspective. display perferct? Matthew Holloway 2008-06-30 12:10
00821 Re: [oiic-formation-discuss] Proposed Use case -- Interoperability in vertical and horizontal ODF markets marbux 2008-06-30 12:23
00822 Re: [oiic-formation-discuss] My perspective. display perferct? David Gerard 2008-06-30 12:24
00823 Re: [oiic-formation-discuss] Proposed Use case -- Interoperability in vertical and horizontal ODF markets Peter Dolding 2008-06-30 12:36
00824 Re: [oiic-formation-discuss] My perspective [email protected] 2008-06-30 12:53
00825 Re: [oiic-formation-discuss] My perspective. display perferct? [email protected] 2008-06-30 13:13
00826 Re: [oiic-formation-discuss] My perspective. display perferct? Craig A. Eddy 2008-06-30 13:16
00827 Re: [oiic-formation-discuss] My perspective Dave Pawson 2008-06-30 13:34
00828 Re: [oiic-formation-discuss] Can we turn on list moderation now? "Dharles-I. Rchulz" 2008-06-30 13:44
00829 Re: [oiic-formation-discuss] My perspective. Extensions Gordon MacGinitie 2008-06-30 14:01
00830 Re: [oiic-formation-discuss] My perspective. display perferct? David Gerard 2008-06-30 14:56
00831 Re: [oiic-formation-discuss] Proposed Use case -- Interoperability in vertical and horizontal ODF markets marbux 2008-06-30 15:14
00832 Re: [oiic-formation-discuss] Profiles: suggested use-cases [email protected] 2008-06-30 15:19
00833 Re: [oiic-formation-discuss] My perspective. display perferct? [email protected] 2008-06-30 15:19
00834 Re: [oiic-formation-discuss] Proposed Use case -- Interoperability in vertical and horizontal ODF markets jose lorenzo 2008-06-30 15:30
00835 Re: [oiic-formation-discuss] My perspective. display perferct? David Gerard 2008-06-30 15:31
00836 Re: [oiic-formation-discuss] My perspective. display perferct? [email protected] 2008-06-30 15:47
00837 Re: [oiic-formation-discuss] My perspective [email protected] 2008-06-30 16:00
00838 Re: [oiic-formation-discuss] My perspective. display perferct? Sam Johnston 2008-06-30 16:08
00839 Re: [oiic-formation-discuss] Proposed Use case -- Interoperability invertical and horizontal ODF markets [email protected] 2008-06-30 16:25
00840 Re: [oiic-formation-discuss] Proposed Use case -- Interoperability in vertical and horizontal ODF markets marbux 2008-06-30 16:27
00841 Re: [oiic-formation-discuss] Proposed Use case -- Interoperability in vertical and horizontal ODF markets Alexander Wright 2008-06-30 18:08
00842 Re: [oiic-formation-discuss] My perspective. display perferct? Radoslav Dejanović 2008-06-30 20:41
00843 Re: [oiic-formation-discuss] My perspective. display perferct? Alexander Wright 2008-06-30 20:45
00844 Re: [oiic-formation-discuss] My perspective. display perferct? Radoslav Dejanović 2008-06-30 20:49
00845 Re: [oiic-formation-discuss] My perspective. display perferct? Thomas Zander 2008-06-30 21:00
00846 Re: [oiic-formation-discuss] My perspective. Extensions Radoslav Dejanović 2008-06-30 21:02
00847 Profile of ODF + PDF [email protected] 2008-06-30 21:13
00848 Re: [oiic-formation-discuss] My perspective Thomas Zander 2008-06-30 21:13
00849 Re: [oiic-formation-discuss] My perspective Thomas Zander 2008-06-30 21:27
00850 Re: [oiic-formation-discuss] My perspective. Extensions "Cen Caston" 2008-06-30 21:51
00851 Re: [oiic-formation-discuss] My perspective Peter Dolding 2008-06-30 21:56
00852 Re: [oiic-formation-discuss] My perspective. Extensions Craig A. Eddy 2008-06-30 22:09
00853 Re: [oiic-formation-discuss] My perspective Craig A. Eddy 2008-06-30 22:20
00854 Re: [oiic-formation-discuss] My perspective. Extensions Ben Baston 2008-06-30 22:57
00855 Re: [oiic-formation-discuss] My perspective. Extensions David Gerard 2008-06-30 22:59
00856 OASIS Mailing List Policy and User Unsubscribed from the List Mary McRae 2008-06-30 23:02
00857 Re: [oiic-formation-discuss] My perspective. display perferct? Sam Johnston 2008-06-30 23:07
00858 Re: [oiic-formation-discuss] My perspective. display perferct? Art Petrzelka 2008-07-01 00:14
00859 Re: [oiic-formation-discuss] My perspective. Extensions robert_weirAus.ibm.com 2008-07-01 01:51
00860 Re: [oiic-formation-discuss] My perspective [email protected] 2008-07-01 01:51
00861 Re: [oiic-formation-discuss] My perspective [email protected] 2008-07-01 02:05
00862 Moving forward [email protected] 2008-07-01 02:24
00863 RE: [oiic-formation-discuss] My perspective (purpose ofTCs?) David RR Webber \(XML\) 2008-07-01 02:41