Voting, Open Source vs OASIS, and PKI Guidelines. Was. Whither PKI-TC? (was Meeting tomorrow)

At this stage I believe that deciding what to focus 
on is the primary concern.

 

New 
PKI-related Standards

 

In case this group is going to commit themselves to 
standards developments, the outcome of such a 
decision may be that it should not be carried out 
in the realm of PKI-TC but rather in an entirely 
new for that purpose dedicated OASIS TC.  As a member of several standards groups, I note that standards development requires much more member interaction and under 
longer periods than for example 
surveys.  I can't imagine any PKI standards 
development that would not take at least 18 months to complete.  In fact, the average task seems more like a 2-year 
journey.  That's a major commitment, 
requiring that the actual task is of big 
importance for the associated members and that they can actually afford it. I have a 
feeling that there are few such tasks to be found which means that any work would be on a more or less idealistic 
(=private) basis, unless you happen to get EU or government 
funding.

 

Open Source versus 
Standards

 

It appears that Open Source projects are better 
geared for carrying out stuff that does not have 
an immediate monetary return for the 
members.  Recently [yet] another EU-based group launched an 
effort to create a "WebSign" facility for 
e-government usage.  That is, nobody intends 
to make a nickel on the SW itself, but rather 
anticipates that it will enable deployment of new applications.  
By offering a competent and free scheme, this 
group hopes to set a de-facto standard for 
WebSigning.  An OASIS process would add considerable delays and if such a TC does not also involve 
Microsoft, the result would by definition be 
"non-authoritative" since Microsoft have some 
80-90% of the browser market.  Underground work seems like a way ahead at this early stage.  It is worth 
noting that the SAFE (biopharma) signature effort is going in this 
direction as well.

 

That is, PKI standards development is currently at 
a cross-road, spurred by the zero-cost client-model imposed by "Internet-scale" 
PKI deployments.  This is primarily happening in the EU, where PKI is a 
consumer/citizen "movement", rather than an enterprise activity.

 

 

The 
PKI Guidelines

 

Regarding voting I would like the voting members to 
take a decision regarding the development of PKI 
application guidelines.

However, I think that such a voting must be 
preceded by some kind of check, to see how many 
people who would like to contribute to such a 
task.  Since such work has never been performed by any group before, I remain skeptical about the chance of bringing in the people needed to make the 
deliverables authoritative.  I believe that 
without any ties to for example NIST, such an 
effort will simply go nowhere.

 

As it looks right now, surveys like the ones 
carried out by Stephen Wilson, is what we can 
deal with.

 

Anders Rundgren

 

----- Original Message ----- 

From: "Stephen Wilson" <>

To: "Arshad Noor" <>

Cc: "PKI TC" <>

Sent: Sunday, May 21, 2006 07:26

Subject: [pki-tc] re:[pki-tc] Whither PKI-TC? (was 
Meeting tomorrow)

Arshad

Nice summary, thanks very much. 

Regarding the 
suggested change to the voting rules, I would just like to
put a contrary and 
cautious view, particularly in light of how small our
group is.  I think 
we need somehow to enourage long term and consistent
engagement with the 
committee.  There may be risk if it is too easy for
people with 
relatively little commitment to the group to vote on issues as
they see fit, 
perhaps capriciously, thus exercising disproportionate power.
 A great 
deal gets accomplished by live engagement in the meetings.  I
think a 
consistent level of live engagement in meetings should be a
pre-requisite to 
being able to vote.  

Cheers, 

Stephen.

Stephen 
Wilson
Lockstep Consulting Pty Ltd
www.lockstep.com.au
ABN 59 593 754 
482

11 Minnesota Ave
Five Dock NSW 2046
Australia

P +61 
(0)414 488 851

--------------------

About Lockstep 
Lockstep 
was established in early 2004 by noted authentication expert
Stephen Wilson, 
to provide independent specialist advice and analysis on
identity management, 
PKI and smartcards.  Lockstep is also developing
unique new smartcard 
solutions to address privacy and identity theft. 

> I've heard 
some great feedback from the forum - over e-mail and
> in the meeting - 
and I'm going to try to summarize what I heard.
> Please correct me if 
I've misinterpreted/missed anything:
> 
> * Our charter is very 
broad and could encompass creating
>    technical standards 
for the use of PKI, if appropriate;
> 
> * We ned to consider 
changing the rule that "punishes" voting
>    members if 
they don't attend 2 consecutive meetings;
> 
> * We need to create a 
better perception of PKI, relative to
>    other security 
technologies;
> 
> * We need to sharpen our message about PKI and 
the benefits it
>    brings to business;
> 
> * 
We need to continue addressing the concerns raised in the 
PKI
>    survey from 3 years ago - especially cost, user 
interfaces and
>    technical understanding;
> 

> * Application guidelines are missing for integrating PKI, 
thus
>    leading to non-standard implementations; the 
absence of
>    "universal, open source, cross-platform 
API(s)" creates the
>    biggest hurdles for use of PKI 
outside IA&A.
> 
> I may have missed some other messages, so 
please send them to
> this list so we can add them to this 
summary.
> 
> I see these statements falling into 3 
categories:
> 
> 1) Administrative - (rule change about missing 
meetings), which
>     we can change based on a vote, 
I imagine;
> 
> 2) Communications - better articulation of our 
message towards
>     creating a more favorable 
perception of PKI; and
> 
> 3) Application guidelines - the lack 
thereof.
> 
> I'd like to get some feedback to this initial 
summarization.  If
> the TC believes that this summary is on target, 
I'd like us to
> think of project propsals to address these statements, as 
a next
> step.
> 
> Thank you.
> 
> Arshad 
Noor
> StrongAuth, Inc.
> 
> 
> Arshad Noor 
wrote:
> > Friends,
> > 
> > Since tomorrow is the 
first meeting that I will be conducting
> > as the new chair, I wanted 
to take the opportunity for us to
> > have a discussion around the TC's 
future.  Since I'm not sure
> > everyone is on the Member Section 
alias (I'm not - and I'm not
> > sure why), I'm sending you a message 
that I sent there last
> > week to help spur some discussion tomorrow 
on this subject.
> > 
> > Whether you're a regular participant 
to the TC meetings or
> > not, I'd like to invite you to attend this 
session tomorrow
> > to provide some input on the two topics outlined 
below.
> > 
> > If you cannot join us due to other 
commitments, please send
> > us your feedback on this list, so we can 
incorporate it into
> > our discussion.
> > 
> > As 
the internet gets more dangerous and awareness increases
> > amongst 
software developers/architects, I strongly believe
> > that the use of 
public-key cryptograpy is on the threshold
> > of a new dawn.  I'm 
hoping that you can join us in taking
> > advantage of this new 
awareness, and in helping shape the
> > way the technology can help 
your company or you, personally.
> > 
> > The topics I'd like 
to discuss tomorrow are:
> > 
> > 1) As a technical committee, 
what technology standards do we
> >    establish given 
that PKIX establishes international technical
> >    
standards for PKI, and W3C has established XMLSignature,
> 
>    XMLEncryption and XKMS as standards?  What value do 
we
> >    add to the field of PKI to justify our 
existence?
> > 
> > 2) The TC conducted a survey 2-3 years ago 
that highlighted
> >    why people were not using 
PKI.  Yet, many countries around
> >    the world, 
the US Federal Government, the cable/satellite
> >    
industry, the DRM world all use PKI in one form or another.
> 
>    What is the real reason that the general business
> 
>    applications/IT developers shun PKI?  (Being an 
applications
> >    developer myself, I have some 
notions on this that I'd like
> >    to discuss in the 
TC, but I want to hear from everybody else
> >    
first).
> > 
> > We may not have enough time to cover this 
discussion tomorrow,
> > but I hope to begin it over e-mail, and 
continue on the phone
> > and e-mail.  Ann Terwilliger has kindly 
arranged for a toll-free
> > number (in the US) for this meeting.  
It is:
> > 
> > Date/Time:     MAY, 17 
2006 at 9:00 AM America/Los_Angeles
> > 
Length:        60
> > Meeting 
ID:    3661
> > Phone Number:    
877-847-2001 (USA & Canada) or 650-432-0111
> > 
> > I 
hope to hear from you.  Thank you.
> > 
> > Arshad 
Noor
> > StrongAuth, 
Inc.

---------------------------------------------------------------------
To 
unsubscribe from this mail list, you must leave the OASIS TC that
generates 
this mail.  You may a link to this group and all your TCs in 
OASIS
at:
https://www.oasis-open.org/apps/org/workgroup/portal/my_workgroups.php