Next in thread → Next in month →

RE: [saml-dev] Possible errata: no definition of Statement in the glossary

From
Scott Cantor <>
Date
2008-09-11T15:27:56+00:00
ID
01cc01c91423$179177b0$46b46710$@
Thread
RE: [saml-dev] Possible errata: no definition of Statement in the glossary
> The word 'Statement' is used extensively in the specs, but there is no
> mention in the Glossary, either as a Term or in the context of relevant
> Terms (eg. Assertion). It might be desirable to include 'Statement' as a
> Term, and place it into context in the definition of other relevant
> Terms.

I'm falling behind on errata items, but I'll add a PE the next time I edit
the document. I don't have any text to suggest, so I'll just record the
issue unless somebody else comes up with a proposed change.

-- Scott
Next in thread → Next in month →