| 00000 |
Groups - CD 02 Rev 3 PDF Format (sca-assembly-1.1-spec-cd02-Rev3.pdf) uploaded |
[email protected]
|
2009-02-02 10:34 |
| 00001 |
Groups - CD 02 Rev 3 Word Format (sca-assembly-1.1-spec-cd02-Rev3.doc) uploaded |
[email protected]
|
2009-02-02 10:38 |
| 00002 |
Groups - SCA Assembly Con Call cancelled |
[email protected]
|
2009-02-02 14:15 |
| 00003 |
Latest Revision of SCA Assembly Specification |
Mike Edwards
|
2009-02-02 14:25 |
| 00004 |
NEW ISSUE: ASM13001 is incomplete. |
Bryan Aupperle
|
2009-02-04 18:07 |
| 00005 |
Some review comments on sca-assembly-1.1-spec-cd02-Rev3.pdf |
D Uamsi
|
2009-02-04 19:57 |
| 00006 |
Re: [sca-assembly] Some review comments on sca-assembly-1.1-spec-cd02-Rev3.pdf |
D Uamsi
|
2009-02-04 20:54 |
| 00007 |
ACTION REQUIRED: Acknowledgements section of Assembly spec |
Mike Edwards
|
2009-02-05 10:23 |
| 00008 |
NEW ISSUE: RFC2119 Corrections to CD02 Rev3 |
Eric Wells
|
2009-02-05 20:43 |
| 00009 |
Groups - CD 02 Rev4 Word Format (sca-assembly-1.1-spec-cd02-Rev4.doc) uploaded |
[email protected]
|
2009-02-06 12:56 |
| 00010 |
Groups - CD 02 Rev4 PDF Format (sca-assembly-1.1-spec-cd02-Rev4.pdf) uploaded |
[email protected]
|
2009-02-06 13:17 |
| 00011 |
Re: [sca-assembly] Issue 106: RFC2119 Corrections to CD02 Rev3 |
Mike Edwards
|
2009-02-06 13:26 |
| 00012 |
[ISSUE 106] RFC2119 Corrections to CD02 Rev3 - Proposal |
Mike Edwards
|
2009-02-06 13:35 |
| 00013 |
Re: [sca-assembly] NEW ISSUE: RFC2119 Corrections to CD02 Rev3 |
Mike Edwards
|
2009-02-06 14:04 |
| 00014 |
RE: [sca-assembly] NEW ISSUE: RFC2119 Corrections to CD02 Rev3 |
Martin Chapman
|
2009-02-06 17:43 |
| 00015 |
Groups - SCA Assembly F2F Meeting modified |
[email protected]
|
2009-02-09 10:53 |
| 00016 |
Groups - SCA Assembly F2F Meeting modified |
[email protected]
|
2009-02-09 10:54 |
| 00017 |
Re: [sca-assembly] NEW ISSUE: Editorial cleanup of normative statetments |
Mike Edwards
|
2009-02-09 11:28 |
| 00018 |
Re: [sca-assembly] NEW ISSUE: ASM13001 is incomplete. |
Mike Edwards
|
2009-02-09 11:32 |
| 00019 |
[URGENT] Assembly TC conf call tomorrow, 10th Feb 2009 |
Mike Edwards
|
2009-02-09 12:12 |
| 00020 |
Groups - CD 02 Rev4 Word Format (sca-assembly-1.1-spec-cd02-Rev4.doc) uploaded |
[email protected]
|
2009-02-09 12:35 |
| 00021 |
Groups - CD 02 Rev4 PDF Format (sca-assembly-1.1-spec-cd02_Issue104.pdf) uploaded |
[email protected]
|
2009-02-09 12:36 |
| 00022 |
Groups - SCA Assembly Con Call modified |
[email protected]
|
2009-02-09 12:41 |
| 00023 |
Groups - CD 02 Rev4 PDF Format (sca-assembly-1.1-spec-cd02-Rev4.pdf) uploaded |
[email protected]
|
2009-02-10 09:39 |
| 00024 |
Groups - CD 02 Rev4 PDF Format (sca-assembly-1.1-spec-cd02-Rev4.pdf) uploaded |
[email protected]
|
2009-02-10 09:40 |
| 00025 |
NEW ISSUE: Assembly - Allow call semantics to be specified in interfaceelement |
Graham Charters
|
2009-02-10 13:17 |
| 00026 |
Re: [sca-assembly] NEW ISSUE: Assembly - Allow call semantics to bespecified in interface element |
Mike Edwards
|
2009-02-10 14:47 |
| 00027 |
Groups - SCA Assembly Con Call modified |
[email protected]
|
2009-02-10 14:49 |
| 00028 |
Draft Minutes of 2009-02-10 are attached |
Bob Freund
|
2009-02-10 17:01 |
| 00029 |
Re: [sca-assembly] Some review comments on sca-assembly-1.1-spec-cd02-Rev3.pdf |
Mike Edwards
|
2009-02-10 17:18 |
| 00030 |
Re: [sca-assembly] Some review comments on sca-assembly-1.1-spec-cd02-Rev3.pdf |
D Uamsi
|
2009-02-10 17:35 |
| 00031 |
Groups - CD 02 Rev4 Word Format (sca-assembly-1.1-spec-cd02-Rev4.doc) uploaded |
[email protected]
|
2009-02-11 09:57 |
| 00032 |
Groups - CD 02 Rev4 PDF Format (sca-assembly-1.1-spec-cd02-Rev4.pdf) uploaded |
[email protected]
|
2009-02-11 10:08 |
| 00033 |
Re: [sca-assembly] Some review comments on sca-assembly-1.1-spec-cd02-Rev3.pdf |
Mike Edwards
|
2009-02-11 10:29 |
| 00034 |
CD02 Rev4 available now |
Mike Edwards
|
2009-02-11 10:30 |
| 00035 |
Groups - SCA Assembly Con Call modified |
[email protected]
|
2009-02-11 13:03 |
| 00036 |
Groups - SCA Assembly F2F Meeting modified |
[email protected]
|
2009-02-11 13:05 |
| 00037 |
Groups - SCA Assembly F2F Meeting modified |
[email protected]
|
2009-02-11 13:06 |
| 00038 |
Review comments on sca-assembly-1.1-spec-cd02-Rev4.doc (sent out on 6th Feb) |
D Uamsi
|
2009-02-11 15:09 |
| 00039 |
ASSEMBLY-109: Proposed resolution |
Graham Charters
|
2009-02-11 15:48 |
| 00040 |
Re: [sca-assembly] Review comments on sca-assembly-1.1-spec-cd02-Rev4.doc (sentout on 6th Feb) |
D Uamsi
|
2009-02-11 15:54 |
| 00041 |
Fw: ASSEMBLY-109: Proposed resolution |
Graham Charters
|
2009-02-11 16:14 |
| 00042 |
Re: [sca-assembly] Some review comments on sca-assembly-1.1-spec-cd02-Rev3.pdf |
D Uamsi
|
2009-02-11 17:17 |
| 00043 |
NEW ISSUE: Inconsistency arising from ASSEMBLY-16 changes |
Simon Nash
|
2009-02-11 23:08 |
| 00044 |
Re: [sca-assembly] Some review comments on sca-assembly-1.1-spec-cd02-Rev3.pdf |
Mike Edwards
|
2009-02-12 10:55 |
| 00045 |
Re: [sca-assembly] Review comments on sca-assembly-1.1-spec-cd02-Rev4.doc (sentout on 6th Feb) |
Mike Edwards
|
2009-02-12 11:57 |
| 00046 |
Re: [sca-assembly] Review comments on sca-assembly-1.1-spec-cd02-Rev4.doc (sentout on 6th Feb) |
D Uamsi
|
2009-02-12 12:07 |
| 00047 |
NEW ISSUE: Description for @name attribute of component property is notconsistent with that of service and reference |
C Vamsi
|
2009-02-12 13:22 |
| 00048 |
Re: [sca-assembly] Review comments on sca-assembly-1.1-spec-cd02-Rev4.doc (sentout on 6th Feb) |
D Uamsi
|
2009-02-12 13:22 |
| 00049 |
NEW ISSUE: XML for MyValueComposite in "Example Component" section 4.5 haserrors |
D Uamsi
|
2009-02-12 13:32 |
| 00050 |
Re: [sca-assembly] Review comments on sca-assembly-1.1-spec-cd02-Rev4.doc (sentout on 6th Feb) |
Mike Edwards
|
2009-02-12 13:35 |
| 00051 |
Re: [sca-assembly] ASSEMBLY-109: Proposed resolution |
Simon Nash
|
2009-02-12 13:36 |
| 00052 |
NEW ISSUE: Error in example under section 3.3 Example Implementation |
D Uamsi
|
2009-02-12 13:55 |
| 00053 |
Re: [sca-assembly] Review comments on sca-assembly-1.1-spec-cd02-Rev4.doc (sentout on 6th Feb) |
D Uamsi
|
2009-02-12 14:05 |
| 00054 |
NEW ISSUE: Extension Model should have a normative statement on thenamespace for new interface, implementation and binding types |
D Uamsi
|
2009-02-12 14:22 |
| 00055 |
Re: [sca-assembly] Review comments on sca-assembly-1.1-spec-cd02-Rev4.doc (sentout on 6th Feb) |
D Uamsi
|
2009-02-12 14:27 |
| 00056 |
Re: [sca-assembly] ACTION REQUIRED: Acknowledgements section of Assemblyspec |
D Uamsi
|
2009-02-12 14:49 |
| 00057 |
Re: [sca-assembly] Review comments on sca-assembly-1.1-spec-cd02-Rev4.doc (sentout on 6th Feb) |
Mike Edwards
|
2009-02-12 14:52 |
| 00058 |
Re: [sca-assembly] Review comments on sca-assembly-1.1-spec-cd02-Rev4.doc (sentout on 6th Feb) |
D Uamsi
|
2009-02-12 14:57 |
| 00059 |
RE: [sca-assembly] ACTION REQUIRED: Acknowledgements section of Assembly spec |
"[ary [cQae"
|
2009-02-12 15:20 |
| 00060 |
Re: [sca-assembly] NEW ISSUE: Inconsistency arising from ASSEMBLY-16changes |
Mike Edwards
|
2009-02-16 10:49 |
| 00061 |
Re: [sca-assembly] NEW ISSUE: Description for @name attribute of componentproperty is not consistent with that of service and reference |
Mike Edwards
|
2009-02-16 10:56 |
| 00062 |
Re: [sca-assembly] NEW ISSUE: XML for MyValueComposite in "ExampleComponent" section 4.5 has errors |
Mike Edwards
|
2009-02-16 11:00 |
| 00063 |
Re: [sca-assembly] NEW ISSUE: Error in example under section 3.3 ExampleImplementation |
Mike Edwards
|
2009-02-16 11:04 |
| 00064 |
Re: [sca-assembly] NEW ISSUE: Extension Model should have a normativestatement on the namespace for new interface, implementation and bindingtypes |
Mike Edwards
|
2009-02-16 11:07 |
| 00065 |
Groups - CD02 Rev5 Word Format (sca-assembly-1.1-spec-cd02-Rev5.doc) uploaded |
[email protected]
|
2009-02-16 12:00 |
| 00066 |
Groups - CD02 Rev5 PDF Format (sca-assembly-1.1-spec-cd02-Rev5.pdf) uploaded |
[email protected]
|
2009-02-16 12:01 |
| 00067 |
[ISSUE 107] Editorial cleanup of normative statements - Proposal |
Mike Edwards
|
2009-02-16 12:05 |
| 00068 |
Groups - CD02 Rev4+Issue34 Word format (sca-assembly-1.1-spec-cd02-Rev4_Issue34.doc) uploaded |
[email protected]
|
2009-02-16 14:41 |
| 00069 |
Groups - CD2 Rev4+Issue34 PDF format (sca-assembly-1.1-spec-cd02-Rev4_Issue34.pdf) uploaded |
[email protected]
|
2009-02-16 14:45 |
| 00070 |
[ISSUE 34] Define Error Handling - Updated Proposal |
Mike Edwards
|
2009-02-16 14:47 |
| 00071 |
ISSUE 108: ASM13001 is Incomplete |
Bryan Aupperle
|
2009-02-16 14:57 |
| 00072 |
Groups - SCA Assembly Con Call modified |
[email protected]
|
2009-02-16 15:00 |
| 00073 |
Re: [sca-assembly] ISSUE 108: ASM13001 is Incomplete |
Mike Edwards
|
2009-02-16 15:13 |
| 00074 |
Version Control Commit by mike_edwards |
[email protected]
|
2009-02-17 11:14 |
| 00075 |
SCA XSDs and XML successfully committed to OASIS SVN repository |
Mike Edwards
|
2009-02-17 12:25 |
| 00076 |
Version Control Commit by mike_edwards |
[email protected]
|
2009-02-17 14:23 |
| 00077 |
Re: [sca-assembly] [ISSUE 107] Editorial cleanup of normative statements -Proposal |
David Booz
|
2009-02-17 14:27 |
| 00078 |
Review comments of sca-assembly-1.1-spec-cd02-Rev5.doc |
D Uamsi
|
2009-02-17 15:04 |
| 00079 |
Re: [sca-assembly] [ISSUE 107] Editorial cleanup of normative statements -Proposal |
Mike Edwards
|
2009-02-17 15:13 |
| 00080 |
Version Control Commit by mike_edwards |
[email protected]
|
2009-02-17 15:24 |
| 00081 |
Version Control Commit by baupperle |
[email protected]
|
2009-02-18 19:21 |
| 00082 |
Draft Minutes from 2009-02-17 are attached |
Bob Freund
|
2009-02-18 20:04 |
| 00083 |
LSC Recommendation: Removing the complexity of merging derived component types with sidefiles |
Jeff Mischkinsky
|
2009-02-19 18:57 |
| 00084 |
Re: [sca-assembly] ACTION REQUIRED: Acknowledgements section of Assemblyspec |
Anish Karmarkar
|
2009-02-20 00:00 |
| 00085 |
RE: [sca-assembly] ACTION REQUIRED: Acknowledgements section of Assembly spec |
Mary McRae
|
2009-02-20 00:06 |
| 00086 |
What's the use case for @requires and @policySets on the SCA properties? |
Raymond Feng
|
2009-02-20 06:41 |
| 00087 |
Re: [sca-assembly] What's the use case for @requires and @policySetson the SCA properties? |
ashok malhotra
|
2009-02-20 13:48 |
| 00088 |
RE: [sca-assembly] ACTION REQUIRED: Acknowledgements section of Assembly spec |
Martin Chapman
|
2009-02-20 15:20 |
| 00089 |
[NEW ISSUE] Remove @requires and @policySets from SCA property elements |
Raymond Feng
|
2009-02-20 16:57 |
| 00090 |
Version Control Commit by booz |
[email protected]
|
2009-02-21 13:46 |
| 00091 |
Groups - SCA Assembly Con Call modified |
[email protected]
|
2009-02-24 10:07 |
| 00092 |
Groups - SCA Assembly minutes 2009-02-10.html uploaded |
[email protected]
|
2009-02-24 10:09 |
| 00093 |
Groups - SCA Assembly Con Call modified |
[email protected]
|
2009-02-24 10:11 |
| 00094 |
Groups - SCA Assembly Con Call modified |
[email protected]
|
2009-02-24 10:46 |
| 00095 |
Groups - Issue 107 Proposal Rev2 - Word (sca-assembly-1.1-spec-cd02-Rev4+Issue107.doc) uploaded |
[email protected]
|
2009-02-24 11:26 |
| 00096 |
Groups - Issue 107 Proposal Rev2 - Word (sca-assembly-1.1-spec-cd02-Rev4+Issue107.doc) uploaded |
[email protected]
|
2009-02-24 11:39 |
| 00097 |
Groups - Issue 107 Proposal Rev2 - PDF (sca-assembly-1.1-spec-cd02-Rev4+Issue107.pdf) uploaded |
[email protected]
|
2009-02-24 11:41 |
| 00098 |
[ISSUE 107] Editorial cleanup of normative statements - Updated Proposal |
Mike Edwards
|
2009-02-24 11:44 |
| 00099 |
Issue 101: Complete the Conformance Section |
Martin Chapman
|
2009-02-24 13:33 |
| 00100 |
Action Item 2009-01-26-03 - Review example in Section 3.3 |
Mike Edwards
|
2009-02-24 15:12 |
| 00101 |
Draft Minutes of 2009-02-24 are attached |
Bob Freund
|
2009-02-24 19:38 |
| 00102 |
Re: [sca-assembly] Issue 101: Complete the Conformance Section |
Bryan Aupperle
|
2009-02-24 19:57 |
| 00103 |
Issue 87: My issue with saying that definitions is a single infoset |
Anish Karmarkar
|
2009-02-24 20:40 |
| 00104 |
Groups - SCA Assembly Con Call modified |
[email protected]
|
2009-02-25 09:54 |
| 00105 |
Groups - SCA Assembly Con Call modified |
[email protected]
|
2009-02-25 09:56 |
| 00106 |
Groups - CD02 Rev6 Word format (sca-assembly-1.1-spec-cd02-Rev6.doc) uploaded |
[email protected]
|
2009-02-25 11:44 |
| 00107 |
Groups - CD02 Rev6 PDF format (sca-assembly-1.1-spec-cd02-Rev6.pdf) uploaded |
[email protected]
|
2009-02-25 11:47 |
| 00108 |
CD02 Rev6 available - and Do we need an additional Assembly TC call onMonday 2nd? |
Mike Edwards
|
2009-02-25 13:07 |
| 00109 |
Re: [sca-assembly] CD02 Rev6 available - and Do we need an additionalAssembly TC call on Monday 2nd? |
David Booz
|
2009-02-25 13:30 |
| 00110 |
RE: [sca-assembly] CD02 Rev6 available - and Do we need an additional Assembly TC call on Monday 2nd? |
Martin Chapman
|
2009-02-25 20:04 |
| 00111 |
NEW ISSUE: Interface compatibility refers to input/output types whichis ambiguous when using WSDL 1.1 |
Anish Karmarkar
|
2009-02-26 07:45 |
| 00112 |
Editorial Problem with the Application of Issue 62 Resolution |
Mike Edwards
|
2009-02-26 09:57 |
| 00113 |
Groups - SCA Assembly Additional Con Call added |
[email protected]
|
2009-02-26 11:18 |
| 00114 |
RE: [sca-assembly] Issue 101: Complete the Conformance Section |
Martin Chapman
|
2009-02-26 14:33 |
| 00115 |
DST changes in the US on March 8 |
Mike Edwards
|
2009-02-27 14:50 |
| 00116 |
Re: [sca-assembly] DST changes in the US on March 8 |
D Uamsi
|
2009-02-27 17:05 |
