Re: [sca-assembly] [ISSUE 107] Editorial cleanup of normative statements -Proposal

The text for 50023 and 50024 mentions the same conformance statements.  I don't understand what that's trying to tell me. Is it saying that all of the rules in 50018-50021 can be checked at deployment time or at runtime?  Or is there something more subtle being stated?

typo in 12008 - MAY not to provide

Dave Booz

STSM, BPM and SCA Architecture

Co-Chair OASIS SCA-Policy TC and SCA-J TC

"Distributed objects first, then world hunger"

Poughkeepsie, NY (845)-435-6093  or  8-295-6093

e-mail:

Mike Edwards ---02/16/2009 07:06:18 AM---Folks, Here is my proposal to fix the problems with the normative statements

From:

Mike Edwards <>

To:

"OASIS Assembly" <>

Date:

02/16/2009 07:06 AM

Subject:

[sca-assembly] [ISSUE 107] Editorial cleanup of normative statements - Proposal

Folks, 

Here is my proposal to fix the problems with the normative statements identified in ASSEMBLY-107: 

50023 

50024 

60020 

12004 

12005 

12008 

12025 

This is done as a Rev5 of the CD02 version of the spec, which also contains a set of editorial changes 

resulting from Vamsi's thorough review of the spec (BUT NOT any normative changes from that...)/ 

http://www.oasis-open.org/apps/org/workgroup/sca-assembly/download.php/31230/sca-assembly-1.1-spec-cd02-Rev5.pdf 

Yours,  Mike.

Strategist - Emerging Technologies, SCA & SDO.

Co Chair OASIS SCA Assembly TC.

IBM Hursley Park, Mail Point 146, Winchester, SO21 2JN, Great Britain.

Phone & FAX: +44-1962-818014    Mobile: +44-7802-467431  

Email:  

Unless stated otherwise above:

IBM United Kingdom Limited - Registered in England and Wales with number 741598. 

Registered office: PO Box 41, North Harbour, Portsmouth, Hampshire PO6 3AU