sca-assembly

← back

159 messages · 51 threads

# Subject From Date
00000 RE: [sca-assembly] ISSUE 133: Broken links in the Assembly spec Eric Wells 2009-05-03 22:54
00001 [ASSEMBLY 122] Incorrect Usage of MAY Keyword - Revised Proposal, Part 1 Eric Wells 2009-05-04 01:44
00002 Version Control Commit by mike_edwards [email protected] 2009-05-04 06:44
00003 Version Control Commit by mike_edwards [email protected] 2009-05-04 06:47
00004 Version Control Commit by mike_edwards [email protected] 2009-05-04 06:48
00005 Version Control Commit by mike_edwards [email protected] 2009-05-04 06:58
00006 Version Control Commit by mike_edwards [email protected] 2009-05-04 09:21
00007 Version Control Commit by mike_edwards [email protected] 2009-05-04 15:09
00008 Groups - Assembly Test WSDL XSD sample (Service1a.xsd) uploaded [email protected] 2009-05-04 18:25
00009 Groups - RDDL doc for 200903 NS (200903-rddl.html) uploaded [email protected] 2009-05-05 00:13
00010 Groups - 200903-rddl.html uploaded [email protected] 2009-05-05 00:14
00011 [Issue 80] - Eventing Extensions Jeff Mischkinsky 2009-05-05 06:19
00012 Version Control Commit by mike_edwards [email protected] 2009-05-05 10:59
00013 Groups - SCA Assembly Con Call modified [email protected] 2009-05-05 12:37
00014 Groups - SCA Assembly Con Call modified [email protected] 2009-05-05 12:53
00015 Re: [sca-assembly] [ASSEMBLY 122] Incorrect Usage of MAY Keyword- Revised Proposal, Part 1 Simon Nash 2009-05-05 12:57
00016 Re: [sca-assembly] [ASSEMBLY 122] Incorrect Usage of MAY Keyword - RevisedProposal, Part 1 David Booz 2009-05-05 13:43
00017 Version Control Commit by mike_edwards [email protected] 2009-05-05 14:03
00018 Version Control Commit by mike_edwards [email protected] 2009-05-05 14:13
00019 Intents attached to WSDL ashok malhotra 2009-05-05 14:17
00020 Version Control Commit by mike_edwards [email protected] 2009-05-05 14:32
00021 Version Control Commit by mike_edwards [email protected] 2009-05-05 14:38
00022 Version Control Commit by mike_edwards [email protected] 2009-05-05 14:41
00023 Draft Minutes from 2009-05-05 are attached Bob Freund 2009-05-05 16:45
00024 RE: [sca-assembly] [ASSEMBLY 122] Incorrect Usage of MAY Keyword - Revised Proposal, Part 1 Eric Wells 2009-05-05 17:48
00025 Version Control Commit by mike_edwards [email protected] 2009-05-05 21:17
00026 Version Control Commit by mike_edwards [email protected] 2009-05-05 21:27
00027 Version Control Commit by mike_edwards [email protected] 2009-05-05 21:32
00028 Version Control Commit by mike_edwards [email protected] 2009-05-06 06:33
00029 Version Control Commit by mike_edwards [email protected] 2009-05-06 14:50
00030 Contribution of Eventing Extension Proposal Jeff Mischkinsky 2009-05-06 15:01
00031 IBM's Contribution of SCA-Assembly Extensions for Event Processing and Pub/Subspecification Mike Kaiser 2009-05-06 15:25
00032 SAP's Contribution of SCA Assembly Model Specification Extensions for Event Processing and Pub/Sub V1.00 specification Patil, Sanjay 2009-05-06 16:02
00033 Version Control Commit by mike_edwards [email protected] 2009-05-07 06:45
00034 Groups - SCA Assembly Con Call modified [email protected] 2009-05-07 11:18
00035 Groups - SCA Assembly Con Call modified [email protected] 2009-05-07 11:20
00036 NEW ISSUE: FW: [sca-assembly-comment] Minor nit: reference to unsupported WSDL 2.0 endpoint notion? Martin Chapman 2009-05-07 14:22
00037 Assembly TestCases Complete and ready for Review Mike Edwards 2009-05-08 11:18
00038 Version Control Commit by mike_edwards [email protected] 2009-05-08 15:37
00039 Version Control Commit by booz [email protected] 2009-05-08 18:50
00040 Version Control Commit by booz [email protected] 2009-05-08 18:53
00041 RE: [sca-assembly] [ASSEMBLY 122] Incorrect Usage of MAY Keyword - Revised Proposal, Part 1 Eric Wells 2009-05-08 20:22
00042 SCA-J requesting modifications to namespace document Mary McRae 2009-05-08 23:15
00043 Re: [sca-assembly] [ASSEMBLY 122] Incorrect Usage of MAY Keyword- Revised Proposal, Part 1 Simon Nash 2009-05-09 18:46
00044 Re: [sca-assembly] SCA-J requesting modifications to namespace document Anish Karmarkar 2009-05-11 04:42
00045 Re: [sca-assembly] SCA-J requesting modifications to namespace document Mary McRae 2009-05-11 16:28
00046 Re: [sca-assembly] SCA-J requesting modifications to namespace document Anish Karmarkar 2009-05-11 16:32
00047 NEW ISSUE: Promoting a reference with multiplicity 1..n and targetsshould default to 0..n Simon Nash 2009-05-11 21:50
00048 ISSUE 135: Minor nit: reference to unsupported WSDL 2.0 endpoint notion? Scott Vorthmann 2009-05-12 06:44
00049 ISSUE 136: Promoting a reference with multiplicity 1..n and targets should default to 0..n Scott Vorthmann 2009-05-12 06:46
00050 Apologies Simon Nash 2009-05-12 10:58
00051 Groups - SCA Assembly Con Call modified [email protected] 2009-05-12 12:43
00052 Version Control Commit by mike_edwards [email protected] 2009-05-12 14:52
00053 Version Control Commit by mike_edwards [email protected] 2009-05-12 14:59
00054 Version Control Commit by mike_edwards [email protected] 2009-05-12 15:08
00055 Version Control Commit by mike_edwards [email protected] 2009-05-12 15:15
00056 Version Control Commit by mike_edwards [email protected] 2009-05-12 15:27
00057 Version Control Commit by mike_edwards [email protected] 2009-05-12 15:37
00058 Version Control Commit by mike_edwards [email protected] 2009-05-12 15:58
00059 Version Control Commit by mike_edwards [email protected] 2009-05-12 16:02
00060 Version Control Commit by mike_edwards [email protected] 2009-05-12 16:10
00061 Version Control Commit by mike_edwards [email protected] 2009-05-12 16:13
00062 Version Control Commit by mike_edwards [email protected] 2009-05-12 16:34
00063 Version Control Commit by mike_edwards [email protected] 2009-05-12 16:37
00064 Version Control Commit by mike_edwards [email protected] 2009-05-12 16:39
00065 Version Control Commit by mike_edwards [email protected] 2009-05-12 16:39
00066 Version Control Commit by mike_edwards [email protected] 2009-05-12 16:39
00067 Version Control Commit by mike_edwards [email protected] 2009-05-12 16:40
00068 Version Control Commit by mike_edwards [email protected] 2009-05-12 16:40
00069 Version Control Commit by mike_edwards [email protected] 2009-05-12 16:40
00070 Version Control Commit by mike_edwards [email protected] 2009-05-12 16:41
00071 Version Control Commit by mike_edwards [email protected] 2009-05-12 16:41
00072 Version Control Commit by mike_edwards [email protected] 2009-05-12 16:41
00073 Version Control Commit by mike_edwards [email protected] 2009-05-12 16:42
00074 Version Control Commit by mike_edwards [email protected] 2009-05-12 16:42
00075 Version Control Commit by mike_edwards [email protected] 2009-05-12 16:43
00076 Version Control Commit by mike_edwards [email protected] 2009-05-12 16:46
00077 Version Control Commit by mike_edwards [email protected] 2009-05-12 16:58
00078 Draft Minutes of 2009-05-12 are attached Bob Freund 2009-05-13 13:28
00080 Version Control Commit by mike_edwards [email protected] 2009-05-13 13:29
00084 Version Control Commit by mike_edwards [email protected] 2009-05-13 13:29
00085 Version Control Commit by mike_edwards [email protected] 2009-05-13 13:29
00086 Version Control Commit by mike_edwards [email protected] 2009-05-13 13:29
00081 Version Control Commit by mike_edwards [email protected] 2009-05-13 14:38
00083 Test posting Mike Edwards 2009-05-13 15:19
00079 Version Control Commit by mike_edwards [email protected] 2009-05-13 15:28
00082 Version Control Commit by mike_edwards [email protected] 2009-05-13 15:28
00087 Version Control Commit by mike_edwards [email protected] 2009-05-13 18:48
00088 Eventing spec ashok malhotra 2009-05-14 11:35
00089 Re: [sca-assembly] Eventing spec Simon Nash 2009-05-14 11:48
00090 Re: [sca-assembly] Event Processing spec Mike Edwards 2009-05-14 13:29
00091 Slides for SCA Assembly? Duane Nickull 2009-05-14 15:46
00092 Re: [sca-assembly] Slides for SCA Assembly? Luciano Resende 2009-05-14 16:58
00093 Version Control Commit by mike_edwards [email protected] 2009-05-14 17:52
00094 Re: [sca-assembly] Slides for SCA Assembly? Anish Karmarkar 2009-05-14 18:27
00095 Re: [sca-assembly] Slides for SCA Assembly? Mike Edwards 2009-05-14 20:03
00096 Version Control Commit by mike_edwards [email protected] 2009-05-15 05:44
00097 Version Control Commit by mike_edwards [email protected] 2009-05-15 08:02
00098 Response to a Question on the Openness and Structure of the SCA Assemblytest suite Mike Edwards 2009-05-15 10:59
00099 Version Control Commit by mike_edwards [email protected] 2009-05-15 13:46
00100 Version Control Commit by mike_edwards [email protected] 2009-05-15 21:06
00101 Version Control Commit by mike_edwards [email protected] 2009-05-16 05:57
00102 Version Control Commit by mike_edwards [email protected] 2009-05-16 06:51
00103 Version Control Commit by mike_edwards [email protected] 2009-05-16 17:36
00104 Version Control Commit by mike_edwards [email protected] 2009-05-17 06:22
00105 Version Control Commit by mike_edwards [email protected] 2009-05-17 08:58
00106 Version Control Commit by mike_edwards [email protected] 2009-05-17 11:03
00107 Version Control Commit by mike_edwards [email protected] 2009-05-17 11:07
00108 Version Control Commit by mike_edwards [email protected] 2009-05-17 12:55
00109 Version Control Commit by mike_edwards [email protected] 2009-05-17 22:42
00110 Groups - SCA Assembly Con Call modified [email protected] 2009-05-18 15:00
00111 Assembly call conflict Simon Nash 2009-05-18 21:50
00112 Re: [sca-assembly] SCA-J requesting modifications to namespace document Mike Edwards 2009-05-19 09:00
00113 Version Control Commit by mike_edwards [email protected] 2009-05-19 09:08
00114 ASSEMBLY 132: Microsoft technical comment about the SCA Assembly Modelspecification #1 - Proposal Mike Edwards 2009-05-19 09:22
00115 Groups - CD03 + Issue 133 Word Format (sca-assembly-1.1-spec-cd03_Issue133.doc) uploaded [email protected] 2009-05-19 09:37
00116 ASSEMBLY 133: Broken links in the Assembly spec - Proposal Mike Edwards 2009-05-19 09:40
00117 AUTO: Asokan Ramanathan is out of the office (returning 05/21/2009) Asokan Ramanathan 2009-05-19 10:34
00118 Slides for Discussion of Assembly Testcases Mike Edwards 2009-05-19 12:31
00119 Groups - SCA Assembly Con Call modified [email protected] 2009-05-19 12:38
00120 Re: [sca-assembly] SCA-J requesting modifications to namespace document Mary McRae 2009-05-19 12:52
00121 Groups - Assembly Testcases Description slides (Assembly_Testcases_Description.pdf) uploaded [email protected] 2009-05-19 15:05
00122 Groups - SCA Assembly Con Call modified [email protected] 2009-05-20 16:33
00123 Groups - SCA Assembly Con Call modified [email protected] 2009-05-20 16:34
00124 Response to: "Microsoft technical comment about the SCA Assembly Modelspecification" Mike Edwards 2009-05-21 14:10
00125 NEW ISSUE: Clarify the use of a binding name in a reference target David Booz 2009-05-22 12:32
00126 Re: [sca-assembly] NEW ISSUE: Clarify the use of a binding name in areference target Mike Edwards 2009-05-22 13:47
00127 [ISSUE 137]: Clarify the use of a binding name in a reference target -Comment on Proposal Mike Edwards 2009-05-22 15:28
00128 Re: [sca-assembly] [ISSUE 137]: Clarify the use of a binding name in areference target - Comment on Proposal David Booz 2009-05-22 16:48
00129 Version Control Commit by mike_edwards [email protected] 2009-05-25 18:27
00130 Groups - SCA-EventingProcessing.pdf uploaded [email protected] 2009-05-26 09:35
00131 Groups - SCA Assembly Con Call modified [email protected] 2009-05-26 10:06
00132 Groups - SCA Assembly Con Call modified [email protected] 2009-05-26 10:19
00133 Groups - SCA Assembly Con Call modified [email protected] 2009-05-26 10:24
00134 Groups - SCA Assembly Con Call modified [email protected] 2009-05-26 10:25
00135 Formatted Minutes from 2009-05-19 are attached Bob Freund 2009-05-26 10:35
00136 Version Control Commit by mike_edwards [email protected] 2009-05-26 15:03
00137 Version Control Commit by mike_edwards [email protected] 2009-05-26 15:14
00138 Version Control Commit by mike_edwards [email protected] 2009-05-26 17:58
00139 Groups - SCA Assembly Con Call modified [email protected] 2009-05-27 09:06
00140 Groups - SCA Assembly Con Call modified [email protected] 2009-05-27 09:25
00141 Groups - SCA Assembly Con Call modified [email protected] 2009-05-27 09:26
00142 Test Assertions and TestCases that require Java Mike Edwards 2009-05-27 14:34
00143 [NEW ISSUE] Assembly specification unclear on Contribution vs Deployment -when can errors in artifacts be reported? Mike Edwards 2009-05-27 15:03
00144 Re: [sca-assembly] [NEW ISSUE] Assembly specification unclear onContribution vs Deployment - when can errors in artifacts be reported? Simon Nash 2009-05-27 15:58
00145 Re: [sca-assembly] [NEW ISSUE] Assembly specification unclear on Contribution vs Deployment - when can errors in artifacts be reported? Jim Marino 2009-05-27 18:40
00146 Re: [sca-j] Test Assertions and TestCases that require Java David Booz 2009-05-28 12:01
00147 Review of Test Assertions and TestCases David Booz 2009-05-28 19:17
00148 Re: [sca-assembly] [NEW ISSUE] Assembly specification unclear onContribution vs Deployment - when can errors in artifacts be reported? David Booz 2009-05-28 20:18
00149 Version Control Commit by mike_edwards [email protected] 2009-05-29 05:05
00150 Re: reviewing ASM test assertions and testcases Mike Edwards 2009-05-29 12:44
00151 Re: [sca-assembly] Re: reviewing ASM test assertions and testcases Bryan Aupperle 2009-05-29 13:16
00152 Version Control Commit by booz [email protected] 2009-05-29 13:20
00153 Version Control Commit by booz [email protected] 2009-05-29 13:21
00154 Re: [sca-assembly] [NEW ISSUE] Assembly specification unclear onContribution vs Deployment - when can errors in artifacts be reported? Simon Nash 2009-05-29 13:56
00155 Version Control Commit by mike_edwards [email protected] 2009-05-29 15:10
00156 Version Control Commit by baupperle [email protected] 2009-05-29 20:08
00157 Version Control Commit by baupperle [email protected] 2009-05-29 20:08
00158 Draft minutes of 2005-05-26 are attached Bob Freund 2009-05-31 00:35