| 00000 |
Version Control Commit by mike_edwards |
[email protected]
|
2009-06-01 06:51 |
| 00001 |
Continuing Test Assertion and TestCase review - section 6 |
David Booz
|
2009-06-01 12:21 |
| 00002 |
Version Control Commit by baupperle |
[email protected]
|
2009-06-01 13:22 |
| 00003 |
Re: [sca-assembly] [NEW ISSUE] Assembly specification unclear on Contribution vs Deployment - when can errors in artifacts be reported? |
Jim Marino
|
2009-06-01 18:42 |
| 00004 |
Re: [sca-assembly] [NEW ISSUE] Assembly specification unclear on Contribution vs Deployment - when can errors in artifacts be reported? |
Jim Marino
|
2009-06-01 19:02 |
| 00005 |
[ISSUE 138] Assembly specification unclear on Contribution vs Deployment -when can errors in artifacts be reported? |
Mike Edwards
|
2009-06-02 09:26 |
| 00006 |
Re: [sca-assembly] Continuing Test Assertion and TestCase review - section6 |
Mike Edwards
|
2009-06-02 10:37 |
| 00007 |
Version Control Commit by mike_edwards |
[email protected]
|
2009-06-02 11:33 |
| 00008 |
Groups - SCA Assembly Con Call modified |
[email protected]
|
2009-06-02 12:17 |
| 00009 |
Re: [sca-assembly] [NEW ISSUE] Assembly specification unclear onContribution vs Deployment - when can errors in artifacts be reported? |
Simon Nash
|
2009-06-02 12:28 |
| 00010 |
Re: [sca-assembly] [NEW ISSUE] Assembly specification unclear onContribution vs Deployment - when can errors in artifacts be reported? |
Mike Edwards
|
2009-06-02 12:36 |
| 00011 |
Continuing Test Assertion and TestCase review - section 7-10 |
David Booz
|
2009-06-02 14:08 |
| 00012 |
Draft Minutes of 2009-06-02 are attached |
Bob Freund
|
2009-06-02 16:36 |
| 00013 |
Version Control Commit by baupperle |
[email protected]
|
2009-06-02 17:42 |
| 00014 |
Continuing Test Assertion and TestCase review - section 12 |
David Booz
|
2009-06-02 18:08 |
| 00015 |
Continuing Test Assertion and TestCase review - section 13-14 |
David Booz
|
2009-06-02 20:06 |
| 00016 |
Groups - SCA Assembly Con Call modified |
[email protected]
|
2009-06-03 06:32 |
| 00017 |
Groups - SCA Assembly Con Call modified |
[email protected]
|
2009-06-03 06:33 |
| 00018 |
NEW ISSUE: What is a constrainingType file supposed to look like? |
David Booz
|
2009-06-03 12:53 |
| 00019 |
Normative language for conformance testing requirement |
Simon Nash
|
2009-06-03 13:05 |
| 00020 |
NEW ISSUE: Need TAs and testcases for property/@file and property/@many=true |
David Booz
|
2009-06-03 13:08 |
| 00021 |
NEW ISSUE: ASM50007 has a typo in it. |
David Booz
|
2009-06-03 14:08 |
| 00022 |
NEW ISSUE: Need a normative statement for @autowire inheritance |
David Booz
|
2009-06-03 14:08 |
| 00023 |
NEW ISSUE: There are no conformance statements in section 8.5 (CD03) |
David Booz
|
2009-06-03 14:39 |
| 00024 |
NEW ISSUE: ASM50030 and ASM50031 (CD03) are duplicates |
David Booz
|
2009-06-03 14:54 |
| 00025 |
NEW ISSUE: Unmarked MUST on line 1030 (CD03) |
David Booz
|
2009-06-03 15:01 |
| 00026 |
Re: [sca-assembly] Re: reviewing ASM test assertions and testcases |
David Booz
|
2009-06-03 15:01 |
| 00027 |
NEW ISSUE: ASM60008 and ASM60013 are contradictory |
David Booz
|
2009-06-03 17:54 |
| 00028 |
Re: [sca-assembly] Continuing Test Assertion and TestCase review - section6 |
David Booz
|
2009-06-03 17:54 |
| 00029 |
Re: [sca-assembly] NEW ISSUE: What is a constrainingType file supposed tolook like? |
Mike Edwards
|
2009-06-03 18:21 |
| 00030 |
Re: [sca-assembly] Normative language for conformance testing requirement |
David Booz
|
2009-06-03 19:25 |
| 00031 |
Re: [sca-assembly] Normative language for conformance testing requirement |
Fred Carter
|
2009-06-03 19:43 |
| 00032 |
Re: [sca-assembly] Continuing Test Assertion and TestCase review - section7-10 |
Mike Edwards
|
2009-06-03 21:48 |
| 00033 |
Re: [sca-assembly] NEW ISSUE: Need TAs and testcases for property/@file andproperty/@many=true |
Mike Edwards
|
2009-06-03 21:52 |
| 00034 |
Re: [sca-assembly] NEW ISSUE: ASM50007 has a typo in it. |
Mike Edwards
|
2009-06-04 06:42 |
| 00035 |
Re: [sca-assembly] NEW ISSUE: Need a normative statement for @autowireinheritance |
Mike Edwards
|
2009-06-04 06:44 |
| 00036 |
Re: [sca-assembly] NEW ISSUE: There are no conformance statements insection 8.5 (CD03) |
Mike Edwards
|
2009-06-04 06:45 |
| 00037 |
Re: [sca-assembly] NEW ISSUE: ASM50030 and ASM50031 (CD03) are duplicates |
Mike Edwards
|
2009-06-04 06:47 |
| 00038 |
Re: [sca-assembly] NEW ISSUE: Unmarked MUST on line 1030 (CD03) |
Mike Edwards
|
2009-06-04 06:48 |
| 00039 |
Re: [sca-assembly] NEW ISSUE: ASM60008 and ASM60013 are contradictory |
Mike Edwards
|
2009-06-04 06:50 |
| 00040 |
Re: [sca-assembly] Normative language for conformance testing requirement |
Mike Edwards
|
2009-06-04 10:51 |
| 00041 |
Version Control Commit by booz |
[email protected]
|
2009-06-04 12:03 |
| 00042 |
Groups - Issue 147 - Proposal (Word) (sca-assembly-1.1-spec-cd03+Issue_147.doc) uploaded |
[email protected]
|
2009-06-04 14:34 |
| 00043 |
Groups - Issue 147 - Proposal (PDF) (sca-assembly-1.1-spec-cd03+Issue_147.pdf) uploaded |
[email protected]
|
2009-06-04 14:35 |
| 00044 |
[NEW ISSUE] Assembly Specification does not define the Component Type of aComposite used as an Implementation |
Mike Edwards
|
2009-06-04 14:36 |
| 00045 |
Re: [sca-assembly] [NEW ISSUE] Assembly specification unclear on Contribution vs Deployment - when can errors in artifacts be reported? |
Jim Marino
|
2009-06-04 18:03 |
| 00046 |
Re: [sca-assembly] [NEW ISSUE] Assembly specification unclear on Contribution vs Deployment - when can errors in artifacts be reported? |
Jim Marino
|
2009-06-04 18:05 |
| 00047 |
Re: [sca-assembly] Continuing Test Assertion and TestCase review - section7-10 |
David Booz
|
2009-06-04 19:52 |
| 00048 |
Re: [sca-assembly] [NEW ISSUE] Assembly specification unclear onContribution vs Deployment - when can errors in artifacts be reported? |
Simon Nash
|
2009-06-05 11:51 |
| 00049 |
Version Control Commit by baupperle |
[email protected]
|
2009-06-05 13:12 |
| 00050 |
Version Control Commit by baupperle |
[email protected]
|
2009-06-05 13:25 |
| 00051 |
Version Control Commit by baupperle |
[email protected]
|
2009-06-05 18:25 |
| 00052 |
Version Control Commit by mike_edwards |
[email protected]
|
2009-06-08 11:05 |
| 00053 |
[NEW ISSUE] Some TestCases can only be implemented using specificimplementation Languages |
Mike Edwards
|
2009-06-08 12:24 |
| 00054 |
[NEW ISSUE] wireFormat and operationSelector element declarations don'thave @abstract="true" |
Mike Edwards
|
2009-06-08 12:32 |
| 00055 |
Fw: [sca-assembly-comment] Rebuttal: Against the use of portability andfunctions as reasons for requiring one of the existing 4 languages |
Mike Edwards
|
2009-06-09 08:45 |
| 00056 |
Version Control Commit by mike_edwards |
[email protected]
|
2009-06-09 08:53 |
| 00057 |
Version Control Commit by mike_edwards |
[email protected]
|
2009-06-09 10:28 |
| 00058 |
Groups - SCA Assembly Con Call modified |
[email protected]
|
2009-06-09 13:01 |
| 00059 |
Version Control Commit by baupperle |
[email protected]
|
2009-06-09 13:10 |
| 00060 |
Version Control Commit by baupperle |
[email protected]
|
2009-06-09 13:17 |
| 00061 |
Version Control Commit by mike_edwards |
[email protected]
|
2009-06-09 13:28 |
| 00062 |
Version Control Commit by baupperle |
[email protected]
|
2009-06-09 18:32 |
| 00063 |
Version Control Commit by baupperle |
[email protected]
|
2009-06-09 19:19 |
| 00064 |
Version Control Commit by baupperle |
[email protected]
|
2009-06-09 19:26 |
| 00065 |
Rebuttal: Against the use of portability and functions as reasonsfor requiring one of the existing 4 languages |
Jim Marino
|
2009-06-10 01:07 |
| 00066 |
Version Control Commit by mike_edwards |
[email protected]
|
2009-06-10 11:46 |
| 00067 |
Version Control Commit by mike_edwards |
[email protected]
|
2009-06-10 11:49 |
| 00068 |
Version Control Commit by mike_edwards |
[email protected]
|
2009-06-10 11:53 |
| 00069 |
Version Control Commit by mike_edwards |
[email protected]
|
2009-06-10 12:13 |
| 00070 |
Version Control Commit by mike_edwards |
[email protected]
|
2009-06-10 12:23 |
| 00071 |
Version Control Commit by mike_edwards |
[email protected]
|
2009-06-10 12:35 |
| 00072 |
Version Control Commit by booz |
[email protected]
|
2009-06-10 13:44 |
| 00073 |
Version Control Commit by mike_edwards |
[email protected]
|
2009-06-10 13:46 |
| 00074 |
Version Control Commit by mike_edwards |
[email protected]
|
2009-06-10 13:50 |
| 00075 |
Version Control Commit by mike_edwards |
[email protected]
|
2009-06-10 13:55 |
| 00076 |
Version Control Commit by mike_edwards |
[email protected]
|
2009-06-10 14:01 |
| 00077 |
Version Control Commit by mike_edwards |
[email protected]
|
2009-06-10 14:04 |
| 00078 |
Version Control Commit by mike_edwards |
[email protected]
|
2009-06-10 14:44 |
| 00079 |
Version Control Commit by mike_edwards |
[email protected]
|
2009-06-10 14:45 |
| 00080 |
Version Control Commit by mike_edwards |
[email protected]
|
2009-06-10 14:49 |
| 00081 |
Version Control Commit by mike_edwards |
[email protected]
|
2009-06-10 14:53 |
| 00082 |
Version Control Commit by mike_edwards |
[email protected]
|
2009-06-10 14:58 |
| 00083 |
Version Control Commit by mike_edwards |
[email protected]
|
2009-06-10 14:58 |
| 00084 |
Version Control Commit by mike_edwards |
[email protected]
|
2009-06-10 15:00 |
| 00085 |
Version Control Commit by mike_edwards |
[email protected]
|
2009-06-10 15:08 |
| 00086 |
Version Control Commit by mike_edwards |
[email protected]
|
2009-06-10 15:16 |
| 00087 |
Version Control Commit by mike_edwards |
[email protected]
|
2009-06-10 15:18 |
| 00088 |
Version Control Commit by mike_edwards |
[email protected]
|
2009-06-10 15:19 |
| 00089 |
Major Update of TestCase artifacts completed - Namespaces and Package namesbrought into "OASIS friendly" form |
Mike Edwards
|
2009-06-10 15:43 |
| 00090 |
Version Control Commit by baupperle |
[email protected]
|
2009-06-10 15:51 |
| 00091 |
Version Control Commit by baupperle |
[email protected]
|
2009-06-10 17:05 |
| 00092 |
Version Control Commit by baupperle |
[email protected]
|
2009-06-10 17:37 |
| 00093 |
Fw: [sca-assembly-comment] Few comments from Siemens |
Mike Edwards
|
2009-06-12 15:15 |
| 00094 |
Version Control Commit by baupperle |
[email protected]
|
2009-06-15 12:29 |
| 00095 |
Groups - SCA Assembly Con Call modified |
[email protected]
|
2009-06-16 06:05 |
| 00096 |
Groups - SCA Assembly Con Call modified |
[email protected]
|
2009-06-16 06:35 |
| 00097 |
Groups - CD03-Rev1 Word format (sca-assembly-1.1-spec-cd03-Rev1.doc) uploaded |
[email protected]
|
2009-06-16 12:23 |
| 00098 |
Groups - CD03-Rev1 PDF format (sca-assembly-1.1-spec-cd03-Rev1.pdf) uploaded |
[email protected]
|
2009-06-16 12:27 |
| 00099 |
SCA Assembly CD03-Rev1 |
Mike Edwards
|
2009-06-16 12:32 |
| 00100 |
ASSEMBLY-121 Conformance to OPTIONAL Normative Statements - Proposal |
Eric Wells
|
2009-06-16 12:43 |
| 00101 |
Late Draft Minutes of 2009-06-09 are attached |
Bob Freund
|
2009-06-16 12:56 |
| 00102 |
Re: [sca-assembly] SCA Assembly CD03-Rev1 |
David Booz
|
2009-06-16 13:07 |
| 00103 |
Re: [sca-assembly] SCA Assembly CD03-Rev1 |
Mike Edwards
|
2009-06-16 13:34 |
| 00104 |
Groups - SCA Assembly Con Call modified |
[email protected]
|
2009-06-16 13:45 |
| 00105 |
Groups - SCA Assembly Con Call modified |
[email protected]
|
2009-06-16 13:47 |
| 00106 |
Version Control Commit by mike_edwards |
[email protected]
|
2009-06-16 13:54 |
| 00107 |
Groups - SCA Assembly Con Call modified |
[email protected]
|
2009-06-16 14:03 |
| 00108 |
Groups - SCA Assembly Con Call modified |
[email protected]
|
2009-06-16 14:08 |
| 00109 |
Draft Minutes 2009-06-16 are attached |
Bob Freund
|
2009-06-16 18:41 |
| 00110 |
Groups - SCA Assembly Con Call modified |
[email protected]
|
2009-06-17 06:21 |
| 00111 |
Groups - SCA Assembly Con Call modified |
[email protected]
|
2009-06-17 06:22 |
| 00112 |
Submission of SCA Assembly Test Suite package for Public Review |
Mike Edwards
|
2009-06-17 08:47 |
| 00113 |
Re: Submission of SCA Assembly Test Suite package for Public Review |
Mary McRae
|
2009-06-17 15:50 |
| 00114 |
Two schema issues with SCA Assembly CD03-Rev1 |
Raymond Feng
|
2009-06-17 19:05 |
| 00115 |
Re: [sca-assembly] Two schema issues with SCA Assembly CD03-Rev1 |
Mike Edwards
|
2009-06-18 07:01 |
| 00116 |
Inconsistent and incomplete descriptions of Element attributes andSubelements in Assembly spec |
Mike Edwards
|
2009-06-18 08:13 |
| 00117 |
Re: [sca-assembly] [NEW ISSUE] Assembly specification unclear on Contribution vs Deployment - when can errors in artifacts be reported? |
Jim Marino
|
2009-06-18 13:04 |
| 00118 |
Re: [sca-assembly] Inconsistent and incomplete descriptions of Elementattributes and Subelements in Assembly spec |
David Booz
|
2009-06-18 14:23 |
| 00119 |
Re: [sca-assembly] [NEW ISSUE] Assembly specification unclear onContribution vs Deployment - when can errors in artifacts be reported? |
David Booz
|
2009-06-18 15:17 |
| 00120 |
Re: [sca-assembly] [NEW ISSUE] Assembly specification unclear onContribution vs Deployment - when can errors in artifacts be reported? |
Simon Nash
|
2009-06-18 20:53 |
| 00121 |
ASSEMBLY-149: Siemens comment on implementation type conformancerequirement |
Simon Nash
|
2009-06-19 09:43 |
| 00122 |
NEW-ISSUE: Errors in Test_Types.xsd |
Bryan Aupperle
|
2009-06-19 13:34 |
| 00123 |
NEW ISSUE: Namespace problems in C/C++ .componentType files |
Bryan Aupperle
|
2009-06-19 13:50 |
| 00124 |
[ASSEMBLY 152] Public review comment 2 from Siemens: Binding typereqiurement - Status |
Mike Edwards
|
2009-06-22 09:23 |
| 00125 |
Groups - SCA Assembly Con Call modified |
[email protected]
|
2009-06-22 09:30 |
| 00126 |
Comment on the status of work in the Assembly TC |
Mike Edwards
|
2009-06-22 09:39 |
| 00127 |
Suggested documentation standards for SCA specification documents |
Simon Holdsworth
|
2009-06-22 12:10 |
| 00128 |
RE: [sca-assembly] Comment on the status of work in the Assembly TC |
Martin Chapman
|
2009-06-22 13:45 |
| 00129 |
[Issue 80] Proposed directional resolution |
Anish Karmarkar
|
2009-06-22 17:52 |
| 00130 |
Version Control Commit by booz |
[email protected]
|
2009-06-22 19:28 |
| 00131 |
Re: [sca-assembly] [Issue 80] Proposed directional resolution |
Simon Nash
|
2009-06-22 19:53 |
| 00132 |
RE: [sca-assembly] [Issue 80] Proposed directional resolution |
Eric Wells
|
2009-06-22 21:03 |
| 00133 |
Re: [sca-assembly] [Issue 80] Proposed directional resolution |
Mike Edwards
|
2009-06-23 09:12 |
| 00134 |
Re: [sca-assembly] [ASSEMBLY-138] Assembly specification unclear onContribution vs Deployment - when can errors in artifacts be reported? |
Mike Edwards
|
2009-06-23 13:29 |
| 00135 |
Re: [sca-assembly] [Issue 80] Proposed directional resolution |
Scott Vorthmann
|
2009-06-23 13:56 |
| 00136 |
[ISSUE 132] Rebuttal: Against the use of portability and functions asreasons for requiring one of the existing 4 languages |
Mike Edwards
|
2009-06-23 14:03 |
| 00137 |
ISSUE 154: Errors in Test_Types.xsd |
Scott Vorthmann
|
2009-06-23 14:26 |
| 00138 |
ISSUE 155: Namespace problems in C/C++ .componentType files |
Scott Vorthmann
|
2009-06-23 14:28 |
| 00139 |
Version Control Commit by booz |
[email protected]
|
2009-06-23 15:16 |
| 00140 |
Version Control Commit by booz |
[email protected]
|
2009-06-23 15:19 |
| 00141 |
Re: [sca-assembly] [ISSUE 132] Rebuttal: Against the use of portability and functions as reasons for requiring one of the existing 4 languages |
Jim Marino
|
2009-06-23 17:06 |
| 00142 |
RE: [sca-assembly] [ISSUE 132] Rebuttal: Against the use of portability and functions as reasons for requiring one of the existing 4 languages |
Ferguson, Donald F
|
2009-06-23 17:40 |
| 00143 |
Draft minutes of 2009-06-23 are attached |
Bob Freund
|
2009-06-23 18:33 |
| 00144 |
Re: [sca-assembly] [ISSUE 132] Rebuttal: Against the use of portability andfunctions as reasons for requiring one of the existing 4 languages |
Mike Edwards
|
2009-06-23 22:08 |
| 00145 |
Fw: [sca-assembly-comment] Some more comments |
Mike Edwards
|
2009-06-24 07:56 |
| 00146 |
Fw: [sca-assembly-comment] Comments on Public Review Draft 01 |
Mike Edwards
|
2009-06-24 08:13 |
| 00147 |
RE: [sca-assembly] [ISSUE 132] Rebuttal: Against the use of portability andfunctions as reasons for requiring one of the existing 4 languages |
Mike Edwards
|
2009-06-24 10:27 |
| 00148 |
Re: [sca-assembly-comment] .composite extension for composite file isoverly constraining |
Mike Edwards
|
2009-06-24 10:36 |
| 00149 |
RE: [sca-assembly] [ISSUE 132] Rebuttal: Against the use of portability and functions as reasons for requiring one of the existing 4 languages |
Ferguson, Donald F
|
2009-06-24 10:43 |
| 00150 |
RE: [sca-assembly] [ISSUE 132] Rebuttal: Against the use of portability andfunctions as reasons for requiring one of the existing 4 languages |
Mike Edwards
|
2009-06-24 12:06 |
| 00151 |
Re: [sca-assembly-comment] .composite extension for composite file is overly constraining |
Jim Marino
|
2009-06-24 12:06 |
| 00152 |
Re: [sca-assembly] Fw: [sca-assembly-comment] Comments on Public ReviewDraft 01 |
David Booz
|
2009-06-24 12:12 |
| 00153 |
Re: [sca-assembly] [ISSUE 132] Rebuttal: Against the use of portability and functions as reasons for requiring one of the existing 4 languages |
Jim Marino
|
2009-06-24 14:14 |
| 00154 |
Re: [sca-assembly] ASSEMBLY-149: Siemens comment on implementation typeconformance requirement |
Mike Edwards
|
2009-06-24 14:25 |
| 00155 |
RE: [sca-assembly] ASSEMBLY-149: Siemens comment on implementation type conformance requirement |
Martin Chapman
|
2009-06-24 16:29 |
| 00156 |
RE: [sca-assembly] [Issue 80] Proposed directional resolution |
Martin Chapman
|
2009-06-24 16:42 |
| 00157 |
Re: [sca-assembly] [Issue 80] Proposed directional resolution |
Jeff Mischkinsky
|
2009-06-25 03:04 |
| 00158 |
Re: [sca-assembly-comment] .composite extension for composite fileis overly constraining |
Simon Nash
|
2009-06-25 07:49 |
| 00159 |
Re: [sca-assembly] ASSEMBLY-149: Siemens comment on implementationtype conformance requirement |
Simon Nash
|
2009-06-25 09:40 |
| 00160 |
Re: [sca-assembly] [Issue 80] Proposed directional resolution |
Simon Nash
|
2009-06-25 10:50 |
| 00161 |
Re: [sca-assembly] [Issue 80] Proposed directional resolution |
Simon Nash
|
2009-06-25 11:08 |
| 00162 |
RE: [sca-assembly] [Issue 80] Proposed directional resolution |
Martin Chapman
|
2009-06-25 11:50 |
| 00163 |
Re: [sca-assembly] [Issue 80] Proposed directional resolution |
ashok malhotra
|
2009-06-25 12:55 |
| 00164 |
Re: [sca-assembly] [Issue 80] Proposed directional resolution |
Simon Nash
|
2009-06-25 13:37 |
| 00165 |
RE: [sca-assembly] [Issue 80] Proposed directional resolution |
Martin Chapman
|
2009-06-25 14:05 |
| 00166 |
Re: [sca-assembly] [Issue 80] Proposed directional resolution |
ashok malhotra
|
2009-06-25 14:33 |
| 00167 |
Re: [sca-assembly] [Issue 80] Proposed directional resolution |
Simon Nash
|
2009-06-25 14:47 |
| 00168 |
RE: [sca-assembly-comment] Some more comments - relating to EventProcessing |
Mike Edwards
|
2009-06-25 15:03 |
| 00169 |
Conformace point highlight color |
Bryan Aupperle
|
2009-06-26 19:23 |
| 00170 |
Re: [sca-bindings] Conformace point highlight color |
Simon Nash
|
2009-06-26 21:30 |
| 00171 |
Re: [sca-bindings] Conformace point highlight color |
Anish Karmarkar
|
2009-06-26 22:47 |
| 00172 |
NEW ISSUE: Spec is unclear if callback binding names need to be distinctfrom forward binding names |
Simon Nash
|
2009-06-27 08:36 |
| 00173 |
Re: [sca-assembly] NEW ISSUE: Spec is unclear if callback binding namesneed to be distinct from forward binding names |
Mike Edwards
|
2009-06-29 08:50 |
| 00174 |
Groups - SCA Assembly Con Call modified |
[email protected]
|
2009-06-29 09:59 |
| 00175 |
Groups - SCA Assembly Con Call modified |
[email protected]
|
2009-06-29 10:03 |
| 00176 |
Groups - SCA Assembly Con Call modified |
[email protected]
|
2009-06-29 10:17 |
| 00177 |
Test Subcommittee Call this week?? |
Mike Edwards
|
2009-06-29 11:54 |
| 00178 |
NEW ISSUE: Make support for constrainingType an optional compliance point |
David Booz
|
2009-06-29 19:18 |
| 00179 |
ISSUE-137: Clarify the use of a binding name in a reference target -proposal (c) |
David Booz
|
2009-06-29 19:58 |
| 00180 |
Re: [sca-assembly] ISSUE-137: Clarify the use of a binding name in areference target - proposal (c) |
Mike Edwards
|
2009-06-30 08:41 |
| 00181 |
Groups - SCA Assembly Con Call modified |
[email protected]
|
2009-06-30 08:44 |
| 00182 |
Groups - SCA Assembly Con Call modified |
[email protected]
|
2009-06-30 12:26 |
| 00183 |
RE: ASSEMBLY-121 Conformance to OPTIONAL Normative Statements - Revised Proposal |
Eric Wells
|
2009-06-30 14:28 |
| 00184 |
Re: [sca-bindings] Conformace point highlight color |
Bryan Aupperle
|
2009-06-30 20:11 |
