sca-assembly

← back

98 messages · 47 threads

# Subject From Date
00000 Re: [sca-bindings] Conformace point highlight color Bryan Aupperle 2009-07-01 12:05
00001 Improving conformance testing modularity Jim Marino 2009-07-01 16:45
00002 Administrative Roster Repairs Mary McRae 2009-07-01 17:07
00003 RE: [sca-assembly] Administrative Roster Repairs Martin Chapman 2009-07-01 17:33
00004 Draft minutes of 2009-06-30 are attached Martin Chapman 2009-07-01 18:29
00005 Re: [sca-bindings] Conformace point highlight color Simon Nash 2009-07-01 20:44
00006 Re: [sca-assembly] ISSUE-137: Clarify the use of a binding name ina reference target - proposal (c) Simon Nash 2009-07-01 20:52
00007 Fwd: Improving conformance testing modularity Jim Marino 2009-07-01 23:22
00008 Re: [sca-assembly] ISSUE-137: Clarify the use of a binding name in areference target - proposal (c) David Booz 2009-07-02 13:18
00009 Re: [sca-assembly] ISSUE-137: Clarify the use of a binding name ina reference target - proposal (c) Simon Nash 2009-07-02 13:54
00010 Re: [sca-assembly] ISSUE-137: Clarify the use of a binding name in areference target - proposal (d) David Booz 2009-07-02 15:03
00011 Re: [sca-assembly] ISSUE-137: Clarify the use of a binding name ina reference target - proposal (d) Simon Nash 2009-07-02 21:20
00012 NEW ISSUE: Composite property example contradicts spec definition Simon Nash 2009-07-03 08:08
00013 Groups - SCA Assembly Con Call modified [email protected] 2009-07-06 08:16
00014 Groups - SCA Assembly Con Call modified [email protected] 2009-07-06 08:17
00015 RE: [sca-assembly] Administrative Roster Repairs Martin Chapman 2009-07-07 10:43
00016 Groups - SCA Assembly Con Call modified [email protected] 2009-07-07 11:17
00017 Re: [sca-assembly] ISSUE-137: Clarify the use of a binding name in areference target - proposal (d) David Booz 2009-07-07 13:45
00018 Re: [sca-assembly] ISSUE-137: Clarify the use of a binding name ina reference target - proposal (d) Anish Karmarkar 2009-07-07 15:20
00019 Standing Rules to open new issues Martin Chapman 2009-07-07 15:49
00020 ISSUE-121: Conformance to OPTIONAL Normative Statements - comments David Booz 2009-07-07 16:19
00021 Draft minutes from 2009-07-07 are attached Bob Freund 2009-07-08 07:53
00022 Groups - SCA Assembly Con Call modified [email protected] 2009-07-08 08:24
00023 Groups - SCA Assembly Con Call modified [email protected] 2009-07-08 08:26
00024 Fw: Submission of SCA Assembly Test Suite package for Public Review Mike Edwards 2009-07-08 14:11
00025 Re: [sca-assembly] Fw: Submission of SCA Assembly Test Suite package for Public Review Mary McRae 2009-07-08 14:49
00026 Re: [sca-assembly] Fw: Submission of SCA Assembly Test Suite package forPublic Review David Booz 2009-07-08 14:55
00027 RE: [sca-assembly] Fw: Submission of SCA Assembly Test Suite package for Public Review Martin Chapman 2009-07-08 19:51
00028 Re: [sca-bindings] Suggested documentation standards for SCA specificationdocuments Anish Karmarkar 2009-07-08 22:32
00029 Re: [sca-bindings] Conformace point highlight color Anish Karmarkar 2009-07-08 23:33
00030 Re: [sca-bindings] Conformace point highlight color Anish Karmarkar 2009-07-08 23:48
00031 Fw: PDF line number changes Bryan Aupperle 2009-07-09 19:15
00032 Re: [sca-bindings] Conformace point highlight color Bryan Aupperle 2009-07-09 19:29
00033 Version Control Commit by booz [email protected] 2009-07-13 13:43
00034 Zahir Hezouat is out of the office. Zahir Hezouat 2009-07-13 15:12
00035 NEW ISSUE: Align TA Document with latest Draft Spec Eric Wells 2009-07-14 09:07
00036 [NEW ISSUE] Section 12 does not require an SCA Runtime to raise an error inall error situations Mike Edwards 2009-07-14 10:05
00037 Groups - SCA Assembly Con Call modified [email protected] 2009-07-14 10:16
00038 Version Control Commit by mike_edwards [email protected] 2009-07-14 12:08
00039 Version Control Commit by mike_edwards [email protected] 2009-07-14 12:55
00040 Version Control Commit by mike_edwards [email protected] 2009-07-14 13:10
00041 Interesting PR comment Bryan Aupperle 2009-07-15 19:08
00042 Re: [sca-bindings] Interesting PR comment David Booz 2009-07-15 19:14
00043 Version Control Commit by mike_edwards [email protected] 2009-07-16 21:08
00044 A New SCA Testing TC? Mike Edwards 2009-07-17 09:01
00045 RE: [sca-assembly] A New SCA Testing TC? Martin Chapman 2009-07-17 12:59
00046 Re: [sca-assembly] A New SCA Testing TC? ashok malhotra 2009-07-17 13:58
00047 RE: [sca-assembly] A New SCA Testing TC? Martin Chapman 2009-07-17 14:10
00048 Re: [sca-assembly] A New SCA Testing TC? Bob Freund 2009-07-17 14:14
00049 RE: [sca-assembly] A New SCA Testing TC? Bryan Aupperle 2009-07-17 14:15
00050 RE: [sca-assembly] A New SCA Testing TC? Martin Chapman 2009-07-17 15:00
00051 RE: [sca-assembly] A New SCA Testing TC? Bryan Aupperle 2009-07-17 15:35
00052 Draft minutes of 2009-07-14 are attached Bob Freund 2009-07-20 13:41
00053 Version Control Commit by mike_edwards [email protected] 2009-07-20 17:36
00054 RE: [sca-assembly] A New SCA Testing TC? Patil, Sanjay 2009-07-20 19:07
00055 Request for update to the assembly RDDL/schema from the bindingsTC Anish Karmarkar 2009-07-20 23:27
00056 Re: [sca-assembly] Request for update to the assembly RDDL/schemafrom the bindings TC Anish Karmarkar 2009-07-21 00:40
00057 Groups - SCA Assembly Con Call modified [email protected] 2009-07-21 08:14
00058 Groups - SCA Assembly Con Call modified [email protected] 2009-07-21 09:00
00059 RE: [sca-assembly] A New SCA Testing TC? Konradi, Philipp 2009-07-21 09:36
00060 Amended Draft minutes of 2009-07-07 are attached Bob Freund 2009-07-21 12:24
00061 RE: [sca-assembly] A New SCA Testing TC? Martin Chapman 2009-07-21 12:38
00062 Groups - SCA Assembly Con Call modified [email protected] 2009-07-21 12:39
00063 Groups - SCA Assembly Con Call modified [email protected] 2009-07-21 12:40
00064 [ASSEMBLY-136] Promoting a reference with multiplicity 1..n andtargetsshould default to 0..n - New thoughts Mike Edwards 2009-07-21 14:06
00065 Version Control Commit by booz [email protected] 2009-07-21 14:14
00066 Draft Minutes from 2009-07-21 are attached Bob Freund 2009-07-21 16:46
00067 Groups - SCA Assembly Con Call modified [email protected] 2009-07-22 08:42
00068 Groups - SCA Assembly Con Call modified [email protected] 2009-07-22 08:44
00069 Groups - SCA Assembly Con Call modified [email protected] 2009-07-22 08:46
00070 Groups - SCA Assembly Con Call modified [email protected] 2009-07-22 08:50
00071 Version Control Commit by mike_edwards [email protected] 2009-07-22 09:24
00072 Regrets for 28th July Martin Chapman 2009-07-23 10:46
00073 Version Control Commit by mike_edwards [email protected] 2009-07-28 08:09
00074 Version Control Commit by mike_edwards [email protected] 2009-07-28 11:07
00075 Version Control Commit by baupperle [email protected] 2009-07-28 13:56
00076 Re: [Assembly-80] Bob Freund 2009-07-28 16:08
00077 Re: [sca-assembly] Re: [Assembly-80] ashok malhotra 2009-07-28 16:19
00078 RE: [sca-assembly] Re: [Assembly-80] Martin Chapman 2009-07-28 22:18
00079 Groups - CD03-Rev2 Word format (sca-assembly-1.1-spec-cd03-Rev2.doc) uploaded [email protected] 2009-07-29 09:35
00080 Groups - CD03-Rev2 PDF format (sca-assembly-1.1-spec-cd03-Rev2.pdf) uploaded [email protected] 2009-07-29 09:36
00081 CD03 Rev2 of Assembly Spec Mike Edwards 2009-07-29 09:38
00082 Groups - Issue 136 Proposal - Word (sca-assembly-1.1-spec-cd03-Rev2+Issue136.doc) uploaded [email protected] 2009-07-29 11:37
00083 Groups - Issue 136 Proposal - PDF (sca-assembly-1.1-spec-cd03-Rev2+Issue136.pdf) uploaded [email protected] 2009-07-29 11:38
00084 ASSEMBLY-136: Promoting a reference with multiplicity 1..n andtargetsshould default to 0..n - Updated Proposal Mike Edwards 2009-07-29 11:39
00085 Draft Minutes from 2009-07-28 are attached Bob Freund 2009-07-29 12:53
00086 Groups - SCA Assembly Con Call modified [email protected] 2009-07-29 13:34
00087 Groups - SCA Assembly Con Call modified [email protected] 2009-07-29 13:40
00088 Re: [sca-assembly] ASSEMBLY-136: Promoting a reference with multiplicity 1..nand targetsshould default to 0..n - Updated Proposal David Booz 2009-07-29 18:02
00089 Groups - Issue 136 Proposal - Word (sca-assembly-1.1-spec-cd03-Rev2+Issue136v2.doc) uploaded [email protected] 2009-07-30 08:27
00090 Groups - Issue 136 Proposal - PDF (sca-assembly-1.1-spec-cd03-Rev2+Issue136v2.pdf) uploaded [email protected] 2009-07-30 08:29
00091 Re: [sca-assembly] ASSEMBLY-136: Promoting a reference with multiplicity 1..nand targetsshould default to 0..n - Updated Proposal Mike Edwards 2009-07-30 08:31
00092 Re: [sca-assembly] ASSEMBLY-136: Promoting a reference with multiplicity 1..nand targetsshould default to 0..n - Updated Proposal David Booz 2009-07-30 12:29
00093 Updates to SCA schema and RDDL file Anish Karmarkar 2009-07-30 15:19
00094 Re: Updates to SCA schema and RDDL file Mary McRae 2009-07-30 18:14
00095 [sca-assembly] SCA Assembly Test Suite - ASM_8003_TestCase issues Simon Laws 2009-07-31 11:18
00096 [sca-assembly] SCA Assembly Test Suite - ASM_8010_TestCase issue Simon Laws 2009-07-31 16:09
00097 [sca-assembly] SCA Assembly Test Suite - ASM_8004_TestCase issue Simon Laws 2009-07-31 16:10