← Prev in month ← Prev in thread

Re: [sca-bindings] Conformace point highlight color

From
Bryan Aupperle <>
Date
2009-07-01T12:05:39+00:00
ID
Thread
Re: [sca-bindings] Conformace point highlight color
I should not do these things late in
the day...

Here are the attachments

  

Bryan Aupperle, Ph.D.

STSM, WebSphere Enterprise Platform Software Solution Architect

Research Triangle Park,  NC 

+1 919-254-7508 (T/L 444-7508)

Internet Address: 

Simon Nash <>

07/01/2009 07:17 AM

To

Bryan Aupperle/Raleigh/IBM@IBMUS

cc

, 

Subject

Re: [sca-bindings] Conformace point
highlight color

Bryan,

Where is the sample with the two shades of grey?

   Simon

Bryan Aupperle wrote:

> 

> I have added two shades of grey (10% and 20%) to the samples.  I
agree 

> with your point about grey working well with color-challenged technology

> and people.  My only concern about that approach is that this
does not 

> provide any real visual distinction from samples.

> 

> In the C++ and C specs we use italics for text literals and courier
for 

> language constructs (keywords/identifiers), so I would not be thrilled

> with the font changes you suggested.

> 

> Bryan Aupperle, Ph.D.

> STSM, WebSphere Enterprise Platform Software Solution Architect

> 

> Research Triangle Park,  NC

> +1 919-254-7508 (T/L 444-7508)

> Internet Address: 

> 

> 

> *Anish Karmarkar <>*

> 

> 06/26/2009 06:47 PM

> 

>                  

> To

>                  Bryan
Aupperle/Raleigh/IBM@IBMUS

> cc

>                  ,
, 

> 

> Subject

>                  Re:
[sca-bindings] Conformace point highlight color

> 

> 

>                  

> 

> 

> 

> 

> 

> Bryan,

> 

> Thanks for starting the thread and providing alternatives.

> I actually prefer a shade of grey. Is there a good reason not to use

> grey? Works well with color-challenged technology and people. We could

> even use italics in addition to the grey color. I know in some SCA
specs

> we have used italics (although not consistently) for attribute/element

> names/values, but I would suggest changing that and using courier
new

> font for those.

> 

> I would also like to start a discussion on the suggestion that Eric
had

> made: to use a superscript instead of running text for the conformance

> item number. It does enhance the readability.

> 

> -Anish

> --

> 

> Bryan Aupperle wrote:

>  >

>  > There has been some discussion over the past few weeks
about the color

>  > highlighting of the conformance points in several of the
TCs.  To

>  > summarize the key points of the discussion:

>  >

>  > - Without the highlighting, it is not clear in the PDF
version of

>  > document what the extent of the conformance point text
is (it shows up

>  > with grey shading in Word but this is not carried over
to the generated

>  > PDF).  One of the TAB members remarked favorably on
the highlighting of

>  > the Assembly spec in his review of the C++ spec.

>  > - The current highlight color can make the text  hard
to read in some

>  > environments, especially when the highlighted content includes
added

>  > text that is displayed in a different color.  This
will not be as big a

>  > concern when we are done working on the documents, but
is a problem for

>  > us in the mean time.

>  > - The current color is rather intense.

>  >

>  > I have prepared a test version of the C spec, which currently
does not

>  > have the highlighting, showing 6 different highlight color
options (the

>  > original yellow, plus 5 others)  The best place to
look at the samples

>  > is Appendix F (pages 109-112).  Here you can see the
colors with and

>  > without added text in them.  I have also converted
the sample to PDF to

>  > show what that would look like (links do not work).

>  >

>  >  

>  >

>  > I offer this up to start an e-mail discussion about what
highlighting

>  > color people prefer.  My preference is the light yellow
used for C20006

>  > and C20014.  It shows well but does not seem to clash
as badly with red

>  > marking for added text.

>  >

>  > Bryan Aupperle, Ph.D.

>  > STSM, WebSphere Enterprise Platform Software Solution Architect

>  >

>  > Research Triangle Park,  NC

>  > +1 919-254-7508 (T/L 444-7508)

>  > Internet Address: 

>  >

>  >

>  > ------------------------------------------------------------------------

>  >

>  > ---------------------------------------------------------------------

>  > To unsubscribe from this mail list, you must leave the
OASIS TC that

>  > generates this mail.  Follow this link to all your
TCs in OASIS at:

>  > https://www.oasis-open.org/apps/org/workgroup/portal/my_workgroups.php

> 

sca-ccni-1.1-spec-cd03-rev2-test.doc

sca-ccni-1.1-spec-cd03-rev2-test.pdf

sca-ccni-1.1-spec-cd03-rev2-test-Final.pdf
← Prev in month ← Prev in thread