| 00000 |
Re: [sca-j] Next Telecon |
Anish Karmarkar
|
2008-12-01 07:08 |
| 00001 |
Groups - SCA-J Teleconf cancelled |
[email protected]
|
2008-12-01 10:10 |
| 00002 |
Re: [sca-j] Next Telecon |
Bryan Aupperle
|
2008-12-01 13:25 |
| 00003 |
Groups - SCA-J TC weekly telecon added |
[email protected]
|
2008-12-01 19:14 |
| 00004 |
URGENT - SCA-J TC Telecon scheduled for Friday Dec 5 |
David Booz
|
2008-12-01 19:21 |
| 00005 |
Re: [sca-j] Next Telecon |
Simon Nash
|
2008-12-02 15:14 |
| 00006 |
ISSUE 30 - Process scoped components |
David Booz
|
2008-12-02 18:59 |
| 00007 |
[Fwd: RE: Request to upload SCA-J TC Java Common Annotations andAPI CD 01 spec] |
Anish Karmarkar
|
2008-12-05 15:22 |
| 00008 |
NEW ISSUE: @Constructor value attribute should not be optional |
Simon Nash
|
2008-12-05 16:26 |
| 00009 |
An appeal against TC Admin decision on Java package names |
Eduardo Gutentag
|
2008-12-05 18:55 |
| 00010 |
URGENT - SCA-J Issue backlog |
David Booz
|
2008-12-05 20:38 |
| 00011 |
ISSUE-111: @Constructor value attribute should not be optional |
David Booz
|
2008-12-05 20:43 |
| 00012 |
Groups - SCA-J Teleconf modified |
[email protected]
|
2008-12-05 21:13 |
| 00013 |
Re: [sca-j] URGENT - SCA-J Issue backlog |
C Vamsi
|
2008-12-06 11:45 |
| 00014 |
Re: [sca-j] URGENT - SCA-J Issue backlog |
Jim Marino
|
2008-12-06 21:25 |
| 00015 |
ISSUE 25: Proposal for removing per-call correlation |
Simon Nash
|
2008-12-07 22:28 |
| 00016 |
Groups - SCA-J Teleconf modified |
[email protected]
|
2008-12-08 10:15 |
| 00017 |
Re: [sca-j] URGENT - SCA-J Issue backlog |
Mike Edwards
|
2008-12-08 13:13 |
| 00018 |
Re: [sca-j] URGENT - SCA-J Issue backlog |
David Booz
|
2008-12-08 13:15 |
| 00019 |
Re: [sca-j] URGENT - SCA-J Issue backlog |
David Booz
|
2008-12-08 13:15 |
| 00020 |
Re: [sca-j] URGENT - SCA-J Issue backlog |
David Booz
|
2008-12-08 13:23 |
| 00021 |
ISSUE 95: Proposed direction for resolution |
Simon Nash
|
2008-12-08 15:03 |
| 00022 |
NEW ISSUE: Spurious cast() method definition in ComponentContextinterface |
Simon Nash
|
2008-12-08 15:10 |
| 00023 |
Groups - SCA-J Teleconf modified |
[email protected]
|
2008-12-08 15:17 |
| 00024 |
NEW ISSUE: Runtime behaviour when annotation rules are violated |
Simon Nash
|
2008-12-08 15:23 |
| 00025 |
Spring CI runtime behaviour when annotation rules are violated |
Simon Nash
|
2008-12-08 15:26 |
| 00026 |
NEW ISSUE: JEE integration behaviour when annotation rules are violated |
Simon Nash
|
2008-12-08 15:29 |
| 00027 |
Re: [sca-j] URGENT - SCA-J Issue backlog |
Bryan Aupperle
|
2008-12-08 15:29 |
| 00028 |
NEW ISSUE: Spring CI runtime behaviour when annotation rules areviolated |
Simon Nash
|
2008-12-08 16:21 |
| 00029 |
raw chat room |
Pavlov, Plamen
|
2008-12-08 16:56 |
| 00030 |
Today's raw chat log |
Bryan Aupperle
|
2008-12-08 17:40 |
| 00031 |
ISSUE 112: Spurious cast() method definition in ComponentContext interface |
David Booz
|
2008-12-08 19:01 |
| 00032 |
ISSUE-113: JEE integration behaviour when annotation rules are violated |
David Booz
|
2008-12-08 19:01 |
| 00033 |
ISSUE-114: Spring CI runtime behaviour when annotation rules are violated |
David Booz
|
2008-12-08 19:03 |
| 00034 |
Groups - SCA-J TC weekly telecon added |
[email protected]
|
2008-12-08 19:19 |
| 00035 |
Groups - SCA-J TC weekly telecon cancelled |
[email protected]
|
2008-12-08 19:21 |
| 00036 |
Groups - SCA-J TC weekly telecon cancelled |
[email protected]
|
2008-12-08 19:22 |
| 00037 |
Groups - SCA-J TC weekly telecon modified |
[email protected]
|
2008-12-08 19:33 |
| 00038 |
Re: [sca-j] ISSUE 95: Proposed direction for resolution |
Bryan Aupperle
|
2008-12-08 21:32 |
| 00039 |
ISSUE-115: Runtime behaviour when annotation rules are violated |
David Booz
|
2008-12-08 22:01 |
| 00040 |
Groups - SCA-J TC weekly telecon modified |
[email protected]
|
2008-12-08 22:03 |
| 00041 |
Re: [sca-assembly-testing] Re: [sca-j] testing architecture |
Anish Karmarkar
|
2008-12-10 08:05 |
| 00042 |
Groups - SCA-J TC weekly telecon modified |
[email protected]
|
2008-12-10 15:01 |
| 00043 |
Groups - SCA Java Minutes 2008-12-08 (SCA Java Minutes 2008-12-08.doc) uploaded |
[email protected]
|
2008-12-11 10:14 |
| 00044 |
Groups - SCA Java Minutes 2008-12-05 (SCA Java Minutes 2008-12-05.doc) uploaded |
[email protected]
|
2008-12-11 11:12 |
| 00045 |
Groups - SCA-J TC weekly telecon modified |
[email protected]
|
2008-12-11 11:17 |
| 00046 |
ISSUE 96: Proposal - "Are annotations allowed on static methods?" |
C Vamsi
|
2008-12-11 12:01 |
| 00047 |
Re: [sca-j] ISSUE 96: Proposal - "Are annotations allowed on static methods?" |
Mike Edwards
|
2008-12-11 13:19 |
| 00048 |
Re: [sca-j] ISSUE 96: Proposal - "Are annotations allowed on static methods?" |
Jim Marino
|
2008-12-11 17:26 |
| 00049 |
Re: [sca-j] An appeal against TC Admin decision on Java package names |
Simon Nash
|
2008-12-11 23:17 |
| 00050 |
Re: [sca-j] An appeal against TC Admin decision on Java package names |
Anish Karmarkar
|
2008-12-11 23:52 |
| 00051 |
List of issues against Java CAA that are resolved by not applied |
Anish Karmarkar
|
2008-12-12 05:21 |
| 00052 |
Re: [sca-j] ISSUE 96: Proposal - "Are annotations allowed on static methods?" |
C Vamsi
|
2008-12-12 07:05 |
| 00053 |
Groups - sca-javacaa-1.1-spec-cd01-rev1.doc uploaded |
[email protected]
|
2008-12-12 07:44 |
| 00054 |
Groups - sca-javacaa-1.1-spec-cd01-rev1.pdf uploaded |
[email protected]
|
2008-12-12 07:45 |
| 00055 |
Re: [sca-j] List of issues against Java CAA that are resolved bynot applied |
Anish Karmarkar
|
2008-12-12 07:54 |
| 00056 |
Re: [sca-j] An appeal against TC Admin decision on Java package names |
Mike Edwards
|
2008-12-12 09:08 |
| 00057 |
Re: [sca-j] An appeal against TC Admin decision on Java package names |
D Uamsi
|
2008-12-12 09:44 |
| 00058 |
[ISSUE 55] SCA Java Specifications do not Adequately Define theComponentType of a Java implementation - Updated Proposal |
Mike Edwards
|
2008-12-12 10:28 |
| 00059 |
Re: [sca-j] [ISSUE 55] SCA Java Specifications do not Adequately Define theComponentType of a Java implementation - Updated Proposal |
D Uamsi
|
2008-12-12 11:31 |
| 00060 |
Re: [sca-j] [ISSUE 55] SCA Java Specifications do not Adequately Define theComponentType of a Java implementation - Updated Proposal |
Mike Edwards
|
2008-12-12 13:00 |
| 00061 |
Re: [sca-j] [ISSUE 55] SCA Java Specifications do not Adequately Define theComponentType of a Java implementation - Updated Proposal |
D Uamsi
|
2008-12-12 13:48 |
| 00062 |
NEW ISSUE: Clarify the name implied by setter method for property andreference names |
C Vamsi
|
2008-12-12 13:52 |
| 00063 |
NEW ISSUE: Clarify the name implied by setter method for property andreference names |
C Vamsi
|
2008-12-12 14:00 |
| 00064 |
Groups - SCA-J TC weekly telecon modified |
[email protected]
|
2008-12-12 14:10 |
| 00065 |
Re: [sca-j] An appeal against TC Admin decision on Java package names |
Simon Nash
|
2008-12-12 14:56 |
| 00066 |
Re: An appeal against TC Admin decision on Java package names |
David Booz
|
2008-12-12 20:31 |
| 00067 |
ISSUE-116: Is dependency injection for HttpSessionBindingListener possible? |
Eavid Cooz
|
2008-12-12 21:23 |
| 00068 |
ISSUE-117: Clarify the name implied by setter method for property andreference names |
David Booz
|
2008-12-12 21:23 |
| 00069 |
Resolution of issue 75 |
Anish Karmarkar
|
2008-12-12 22:44 |
| 00070 |
Re: [sca-j] NEW ISSUE: Clarify the name implied by setter method for property and reference names |
Jim Marino
|
2008-12-12 22:56 |
| 00071 |
Groups - sca-javacaa-1.1-spec-cd01-rev2.doc uploaded |
[email protected]
|
2008-12-13 01:08 |
| 00072 |
Groups - sca-javacaa-1.1-spec-cd01-rev2.pdf uploaded |
[email protected]
|
2008-12-13 01:08 |
| 00073 |
All CAA issue resolutions to date applied in cd01-rev2 |
Anish Karmarkar
|
2008-12-13 01:18 |
| 00074 |
ISSUE 111: Proposed resolution |
Simon Nash
|
2008-12-15 10:22 |
| 00075 |
Issues 111 and 55 |
Simon Nash
|
2008-12-15 10:29 |
| 00076 |
Groups - SCA Java Minutes 2008-12-12 (SCA Java Minutes 2008-12-12.doc) uploaded |
[email protected]
|
2008-12-15 10:30 |
| 00077 |
Re: [sca-j] ISSUE 95: Proposed direction for resolution |
Simon Nash
|
2008-12-15 10:52 |
| 00078 |
Groups - SCA-J Teleconf modified |
[email protected]
|
2008-12-15 11:10 |
| 00079 |
RE: [sca-j] Issues 111 and 55 |
Mark Combellack
|
2008-12-15 11:18 |
| 00080 |
Groups - SCA-J Teleconf modified |
[email protected]
|
2008-12-15 13:40 |
| 00081 |
Re: [sca-j] ISSUE 111: Proposed resolution |
Mike Edwards
|
2008-12-15 13:53 |
| 00082 |
Re: [sca-j] ISSUE 111: Proposed resolution |
Simon Nash
|
2008-12-15 14:36 |
| 00083 |
Groups - SCA-J Teleconf modified |
[email protected]
|
2008-12-15 15:04 |
| 00084 |
Re: [sca-j] ISSUE 111: Proposed resolution - take 3 |
Simon Nash
|
2008-12-15 15:31 |
| 00085 |
[ISSUE 55] Final Agreed Resolution Text |
Mike Edwards
|
2008-12-15 16:29 |
| 00086 |
Raw Chat from Dec 15 Telcon |
ashok malhotra
|
2008-12-15 17:02 |
| 00087 |
Re: An appeal against TC Admin decision on Java package names |
Eduardo Gutentag
|
2008-12-15 20:23 |
| 00088 |
Re: [sca-j] ISSUE-117: Clarify the name implied by setter methodfor property and reference names |
Simon Nash
|
2008-12-15 21:18 |
| 00089 |
Resolution of Assembly Issue 33 - potential impact on your TC |
Mike Edwards
|
2008-12-16 09:08 |
| 00090 |
Groups - SCA Java C&I WD02 (PDF) (sca-javaci-1.1-spec-wd02.pdf) uploaded |
[email protected]
|
2008-12-16 20:09 |
| 00091 |
Groups - SCA Java C&I WD02 (DOC) (sca-javaci-1.1-spec-wd02.doc) uploaded |
[email protected]
|
2008-12-16 20:10 |
| 00092 |
Groups - SCA Java CAA cd01 rev3 (pdf) (sca-javacaa-1[1].1-spec-cd01-rev3.doc) uploaded |
[email protected]
|
2008-12-16 20:11 |
| 00093 |
Groups - SCA Java CAA cd01 rev3 (doc) (sca-javacaa-1[1].1-spec-cd01-rev3.doc) uploaded |
[email protected]
|
2008-12-16 20:12 |
| 00094 |
Groups - SCA Java CAA cd01 rev3 (pdf) (sca-javacaa-1.1-spec-cd01-rev3.pdf) uploaded |
[email protected]
|
2008-12-16 20:22 |
| 00095 |
new documents to review |
David Booz
|
2008-12-16 20:30 |
| 00096 |
Re: [sca-j] ISSUE 25: Proposal for removing per-call correlation |
David Booz
|
2008-12-16 21:19 |
| 00097 |
Re: [sca-j] new documents to review |
C Vamsi
|
2008-12-17 08:11 |
| 00098 |
ISSUE 25 and ISSUE 95 |
Jim Marino
|
2008-12-18 08:12 |
| 00099 |
Groups - SCA-J TC weekly telecon cancelled |
[email protected]
|
2008-12-18 14:36 |
| 00100 |
Next Telecon - Fri Dec 19 - CANCELLED |
David Booz
|
2008-12-18 14:44 |
| 00101 |
Re: [sca-j] new documents to review |
David Booz
|
2008-12-18 16:28 |
| 00102 |
NEW ISSUE: Need description for <wireFormat/> and <operationSelection/> |
David Booz
|
2008-12-18 19:08 |
| 00103 |
ISSUE-118: Need description for <wireFormat/> and <operationSelection/> |
David Booz
|
2008-12-18 21:36 |
| 00104 |
Re: [sca-j] new documents to review |
D Uamsi
|
2008-12-19 05:58 |
| 00105 |
Re: [sca-j] ISSUE 25 and ISSUE 95 |
Simon Nash
|
2008-12-19 14:28 |
| 00106 |
Re: [sca-j] ISSUE 25 and ISSUE 95 |
Jim Marino
|
2008-12-19 17:23 |
| 00107 |
Re: Appeal of the OASIS decision on SCA-J package names |
Fduardo Hutentag
|
2009-01-01 01:15 |
