RE: New Name ! (A new suggestion)

From
Jeremy Epstein <>
Date
2001-01-26T17:09:11+00:00
ID
Thread
RE: New Name ! (A new suggestion)
Title: RE: New Name ! (A new suggestion)

Great 
suggestion!  Perhaps almost as importantly, a quick search didn't find any 
significant products that already use this acronym.  (There are several 
companies, etc., but nothing that should cause confusion.)  Perhaps most 
telling, feeding the words Active XML Credentials Exchange Specification into 
Google hit several pages related to this effort near the top of the list... so 
it must be at least related to what we're doing at a buzzword level 
:-)

 

--Jeremy

  
-----Original Message-----
From: Carlisle Adams 
  [mailto:]
Sent: Friday, January 26, 2001 
  11:53 AM
To: ; 'Eve L. 
  Maler'
Subject: RE: New Name ! (A new 
  suggestion)

  
Hi, 

  
I believe that the group 
  has (rough) consensus that "S2ML" should be changed as the overall name of 
  this OASIS TC spec because "Security Services" is too broad.  I, for one, 
  would not want to be in the shoes of the PR spokesperson (currently Eve!) 
  trying to explain to some analyst or press representative why XKMS -- which is 
  clear a security service -- is not within the scope of this TC.

  
Perhaps not surprisingly, 
  I have no objections to "A2ML", but I can understand the hesitation on the 
  part of some who either feel that "Authentication" implies too much, or that 
  "Authentication and Authorization" may be too narrow in scope.

  
Therefore, I will offer 
  another name for consideration (if only so that we have some competition for 
  SEX-ML!).  It seems to me that what this group would like to do is create 
  a specification for the exchange of credentials.  These credentials 
  (today covering both authentication credentials and authorization credentials, 
  but open in the future to other kinds of credentials that we may choose to 
  embrace) will be expressed in XML.  Furthermore, I think it is fair to 
  say that the payload to be exchanged will always include at least one "active" 
  -- that is, currently valid -- credential (name assertion, entitlement 
  assertion, whatever).

  
Thus, my suggestion 
  is:  "Active XML Credentials Exchange Specification", which has the 
  intuitive and somewhat appropriate acronym "AXCES" (pronounced 
  "access").

  
Carlisle.