Re: [Issue] ClockSkew

From
christopher ferris <>
Date
2001-06-05T14:53:08+00:00
ID
Thread
Re: [Issue] ClockSkew
Agreed.

Hal Lockhart wrote:
> 
> I think it would be far superior to require (strongly recommend) that NTP be
> implemented than invent some kind of poor man's NTP.
> 
> Hal
> 
> > -----Original Message-----
> > From: Simon Y. Blackwell [mailto:]
> > Sent: Monday, June 04, 2001 9:55 PM
> > To: ''
> > Subject: RE: [Issue] ClockSkew
> >
> >
> > Although this would by no means solve all the issues with
> > skew, could it not
> > be the case that PEPs or PDPs could volunteer their
> > respective times to each
> > other so that they could at least resolve any bi-lateral skew?
> >
<snip/>