RE: [Issue] ClockSkew

TRUE!

-----Original Message-----
From: christopher ferris
To: Hal Lockhart
Cc: 'Simon Y. Blackwell'; ''
Sent: 6/5/01 7:51 AM
Subject: Re: [Issue] ClockSkew

Agreed.

Hal Lockhart wrote:
> 
> I think it would be far superior to require (strongly recommend) that
NTP be
> implemented than invent some kind of poor man's NTP.
> 
> Hal
> 
> > -----Original Message-----
> > From: Simon Y. Blackwell [mailto:]
> > Sent: Monday, June 04, 2001 9:55 PM
> > To: ''
> > Subject: RE: [Issue] ClockSkew
> >
> >
> > Although this would by no means solve all the issues with
> > skew, could it not
> > be the case that PEPs or PDPs could volunteer their
> > respective times to each
> > other so that they could at least resolve any bi-lateral skew?
> >
<snip/>