Next in thread → Next in month →

RE: XML Signature

From
Krishna Sankar <>
Date
2001-09-25T22:31:36+00:00
ID
Thread
RE: XML Signature
Prateek/Hal,

	Thanks for the input. I am, as we speak, putting together a document with
some rationale for these questions. Also plan to talk with SF.

cheers

  |-----Original Message-----
  |From: Mishra, Prateek [mailto:]
  |Sent: Tuesday, September 25, 2001 3:17 PM
  |To: 'Hal Lockhart'; 'Krishna Sankar'; oasis sstc
  |Cc: 'Scott Cantor'
  |Subject: RE: XML Signature
  |
  |
  |Here is a starting point:
  |
  |(1) Do we need to support all
  |    three forms of signing? Detached, enveloping and enveloped
  |
  |(2) Do we need to support all the varied forms of the
  |<KeyInfo> element?
  |
  |(3) What is the relationship between a signed response and
  |the assertions contained within the response? Under what
  |circumstances should the "super-signature" apply to the embedded
  |assertions. Similar questions arise for requests.
  |
  |I had initiated some discussion in the general vicinity of (3)
  |in
  |http://lists.oasis-open.org/archives/security-services/200106/msg
  |00167.html
  |
  |
  |- prateek
  |>>
  |>>
  |>>On a previous concall, I suggested the first thing to do was
  |>>draw up a list
  |>>of what questions need to be answered to create a profile. I
  |>>don't believe
  |>>this is explicit in the spec. I also suggested that Stephen
  |>>Farrell might
  |>>provide useful input.
  |>>
  |>>Hal
  |>>
  |
Next in thread → Next in month →