Re: [security-services] A "final" proposal on status codes

> Is the recursive inclusion in Substatus code type intentional?? I have
> assumed not since if it were intentional I would have expected notice to be
> drawn to it.

Yes it is.  I lost; I wanted a simple array. :)

Scott probably did not draw attention to it because it got a fair amount
of discussion on the XMLP list, and when he context-switched to here, he
retained too much context. :)
	.r$

-- 
Zolera Systems, Securing web services (XML, SOAP, Signatures,
Encryption)
http://www.zolera.com