I was under the impression that all the comments on the core document were
to take place on the security services list.
Phillip Hallam-Baker FBCS C.Eng.
Principal Scientist
VeriSign Inc.
781 245 6996 x227
> -----Original Message-----
> From: Rich Salz [mailto:]
> Sent: Wednesday, January 09, 2002 8:39 PM
> To: Hallam-Baker, Phillip
> Cc: Scott Cantor; SAML
> Subject: Re: [security-services] A "final" proposal on status codes
>
>
> > Is the recursive inclusion in Substatus code type
> intentional?? I have
> > assumed not since if it were intentional I would have
> expected notice to be
> > drawn to it.
>
> Yes it is. I lost; I wanted a simple array. :)
>
> Scott probably did not draw attention to it because it got a
> fair amount
> of discussion on the XMLP list, and when he context-switched
> to here, he
> retained too much context. :)
> .r$
>
> --
> Zolera Systems, Securing web services (XML, SOAP, Signatures,
> Encryption)
> http://www.zolera.com
>
