RE: [security-services] Potential new issue: WSDL for SAML services

> Now that we've completed the "top-typing" process and the protocols all 
> have distinct request-response element pairs, having a WSDL for each 
> might be more handy.  Are we interested in creating WSDLs this time 
> around?  If we do, would they be informative (maybe going in the Tech 
> Overview?) or normative (possibly being provided/reference as part of 
> each profile)?  If we want these, is there anyone who's interested in 
> creating them?

I think we should work on it, but I think it's not necessary at this stage
to make them normative and add more work to do at the tail end.

-- Scott