← Prev in month
← Prev in thread
Next in thread →
Next in month →
Minutes of SSTC Conference Call, 07-June-2005
=======================================================================
SSTC
call Tue 6/7/2005 9:00 AM
Attendance taken
Prior minutes
approved
Brief discussion of
tackling the agenda slightly out of order due to some members needing to
drop off the call early
SAML Adoption Enhancement
subcommittee
General discussion
Rob sent the OASIS
requirements for creation of subcommittees
Merrit will take the chair of
the new committee and has action item for the next meeting to deliver a
proposal conforming to the OASIS requirements
Latest Errata (agenda pointed
to v7 but v8 is actually the latest)
PE14:
Some general
discussion, Scott and Brian agree on a high level but there may be a few
minor nits.
Give two more
weeks for others to review
Vote next call
Overlap with PE5
is noted and agreement is reached that if PE14 is approved next call,
then PE5 goes away
PE7: Still open
PE10: Still open
PE11: Jahan moved to approve,
Scott seconds, no additional discussion, unanimous consent
PE11: Jahan moved to approve,
Scott seconds, no additional discussion, unanimous consent
PE12: Scott moved to approve, Greg
seconds, no additional discussion, unanimous consent
PE13: Jahan moved to approve, Hal
seconds, no additional discussion, unanimous consent
PE15:
Thomas discusses
the issue and the proposed resolution text
Scott confirms
that the proposal fits with his original intent
Moved to approve, second, no
additional discussion, unanimous consent
Additional PE item
regarding a particular use case within the SSO profile
Greg to seed with
an initial email and Scott will write up the use case, potential issues,
and possible PE text
CD status for xpath
attribute profile
Did not pass the
vote (12 Yes, 1 No, and 11 Abstain votes) and
will not move to CD status
Will continue
discussion on the list and continue document updates
CD status for x509
authn based attribute protocol profile
Did pass the vote (25
Yes, 0 No, and 7 Abstain votes) and will (?) move to CD
status
Significant
additional discussion – particular concern about the title implying
security that isn’t there. Also focus of the document is unclear
to some
Rick & Rob take
an action item to work on the document
Consider a
different name
Address security considerations
Status on
metadata-ext CD edits
Eve on vacation
Rob mentioned
that Eve has sent edited copies to Prateek, Scott Cantor, Greg Whitehead,
and Rob to review. Once that’s done that, Rob will upload the
documents.
Latest Tech overview doc posted
Hold discussion until next
call b/c John is absent
Contributor list for
metadata-ext
taken care of
already
Tom W: Errata for NameIDPolicy
Addressed in errata
discussion
AuthnRequest Subject vs. NameIDPolicy usage
Addressed in errata
discussion
Federated
Provisioning
No additional
discussion
Other business?
Johan – Feature matrix change from NA -> optional re ECP in
conformance? Leave as open for now
A question about ECP and conformance – is required for all
SP/IDP operational modes? YES
Adjourn
← Prev in month
← Prev in thread
Next in thread →
Next in month →