RE: [security-services] Groups - draft-sstc-saml1x-metadata-05-diff.pdf uploaded

> In lines 190--193 and 233--236, the V2.0 attributes NameFormat and
> Name are mapped to the V1.1 attributes AttributeNamespace and
> AttributeName (resp.).  What about the V2.0 FriendlyName attribute?
> May it be used in SAML 1.x metadata?

Sure, why not? The point is to explain what the mapping back to the old
syntax is, and that doesn't map, so it would be ignored. I guess we could
add a note to that effect applying to any other attributes.

-- Scott