On 8/19/06, Scott Cantor <> wrote:
> > In lines 190--193 and 233--236, the V2.0 attributes NameFormat and
> > Name are mapped to the V1.1 attributes AttributeNamespace and
> > AttributeName (resp.). What about the V2.0 FriendlyName attribute?
> > May it be used in SAML 1.x metadata?
>
> Sure, why not? The point is to explain what the mapping back to the old
> syntax is, and that doesn't map, so it would be ignored. I guess we could
> add a note to that effect applying to any other attributes.
That's the only one, I think.
Tom
