Re: [ubl-l10n] UBL 2.0 Errata 01 IDD rev. 2

Roberto,

I agree with your procedure.

Jon

Roberto Cisternino wrote:
> Dear Yukinori Saito,
> the highlighted backgrounds have been generated automatically by a
> procedure, and the two items you have reported have been considered
> different due to additional [carriage return] + [line feed] (CR+LF)
> characters in the end of the text.
>
> After translations have been completed and revised I expect we restore the
> original background for the highlighted cells. (the original background
> can be derived by other columns on the same row)
>
> Into my final italian IDD localization I restored all original backgrounds
> for the highlighted cells I revised.
>
> I please ask Jon Bosak to confirm this practice.
>
> Best Regards,
>
> Roberto
>
>> Dear Roberto Cisternino,
>> Thank you very much for your new IDD spreadsheets (UBL 2.0 Errata 01 IDD
>> rev.2) including all fixes from the UBL 2.0 Errata 01.
>> I have confirmed new correction parts which are highlighted using a green
>> background.
>> The followings are comments regarding new IDD spreadsheets (UBL 2.0 Errata
>> 01 IDD rev.2)
>> - The yellow color (revision mark) of No.1 BIE "BillOfLading" of the
>> business document "Bill Of Lading" should be deleted. Because, this
>> definition is not changed at all.
>> - The yellow color (revision mark) of No.122 BIE "SubstitutionStatusCode"
>> of
>> the business document "qDT" should be deleted. Because, this definition is
>> not changed at all.
>>
>> Best Regards,
>> Yukinori Saito (Vice Chair of UBL JPLSC)
>>

-----------------------------------------

>> Yukinori Saito
>> ERP Research Corporation
>> e-mail: 
>>
Tel: +81-3-3432-1656

Fax: +81-3-5405-1302
>>

-----------------------------------------

>>
>>