Re: [ubl-ndrsc] [ubl-lcsc] Auto-Generated UML Model

I changed UBL000422 to OrderResponse.Order.Identifier yielding an element
with tag name OrderID.  The Zip archive containing the modified schema and
updated diagrams is attached.

I did not repair other names associated with order response.  It seems that
we've got a pervasive problem with the Object Class for order response in
the UBL Spreadsheet, to wit, we've specified an Object Class of "Order"
rather than "OrderResponse".

Hmm... now I'm looking at the Object Class column for other properties of
Order Response... ResponseCode is a big red flag -- it's object class is
"Acknowledgement".  That cannot be.

Similar problems exist in the Order tab.  Properties of ABIE's like
OrderHeader have Object Class named "Order" (should be "OrderHeader").  Same
for OrderSummary where properties have Object Class of "Order" again (should
be "OrderSummary").

If you have a look at the Re-used Types tab you see that it i
s uniformly the
case that property rows (white background) have Object Class set to the
previous ABIE row (pink background).  This should be uniformly the rule
across all tabs.

Anyhow, the tweaked diagrams and schema are attached.

-Bill

-----Original Message-----
From: Tim McGrath [mailto:]
Sent: Sunday, September 01, 2002 3:46 AM
To: Burcham, Bill
Cc: ''; ''
Subject: Re: [ubl-ndrsc] [ubl-lcsc] Auto-Generated UML Model


for the beneift of all the problem with ResponseID is that the first i 
supposed to be OrderResponseOrderID (identifying the Order we are 
responding to) and the second is Order
ResponseID (identifying the 
response).  it is a problem with our use of object classes and names for 
these BIEs.

Perhaps Bill can regenerate with these new names.

Burcham, Bill wrote: